• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用19号或22号针进行超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检术,用于肌层胃黏膜下病变

EUS-FNA WITH 19 OR 22 GAUGES NEEDLES FOR GASTRIC SUBEPITHELIAL LESIONS OF THE MUSCLE LAYER.

作者信息

Lopes César Vivian, Hartmann Antônio Atalíbio, Artifon Everson Luiz de Almeida

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy.

Department of Pathology, Santa Casa Hospital, Porto Alegre, RS.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018 Jun 21;31(1):e1350. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1350.

DOI:10.1590/0102-672020180001e1350
PMID:29947684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6049997/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tissue diagnosis is required for gastric subepithelial lesions for differential diagnosis of GISTs. However, there has not been consensus about the best needle for EUS-guided sampling of these lesions.

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for gastric subepithelial lesions of the proper muscle layer with large-bore 19 gauge needles.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA with 19 and 22 gauge needles for gastric subepithelial lesions of the fourth endosonographic layer in a tertiary care referral center. EUS-FNA was performed by the same endosonographer, using the fanning technique, without on-site cytopathologist. Specimens were analysed through cell blocks by the same pathologist. Procedure results were categorized into diagnostic, defined as enough material for histopathology and immunohistochemistry, or nondiagnostic.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients (mean age: 59 years, 77% women) underwent 92 EUS-FNA with 19 (75) or 22 (17) gauge needles. Mean lesion size was 22.6 mm. Overall diagnostic yield was 88%. The diagnostic yield of 19 gauge was higher than that of 22 gauge needle (92%x70.6%; p=0.0410), and similar for lesions >2 cm and <2 cm (93.7%x90.7%; p=0.9563). The best performance for 19 gauge needles was obtained performing <3 needle passes. Complication rate was 2.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA with 19 gauge needles is 92% for gastric subepithelial lesions of the proper muscle layer. It is safe and highly valuable for differentiation between GIST and leiomyoma, no matter the size of the lesion.

摘要

背景

胃上皮下病变的组织诊断对于胃肠间质瘤(GIST)的鉴别诊断是必要的。然而,对于这些病变的超声内镜引导下采样的最佳针具尚无共识。

目的

评估使用19G大口径针进行超声内镜引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(EUS-FNA)对胃固有肌层上皮下病变的诊断率。

方法

回顾性分析一个前瞻性维护的数据库,以确定在一家三级医疗转诊中心接受19G和22G针超声内镜引导下细针穿刺抽吸术的连续患者,这些患者的胃上皮下病变位于超声内镜第四层。EUS-FNA由同一位超声内镜医生进行,采用扇形技术,且无现场细胞病理学家。标本由同一位病理学家通过细胞块进行分析。将操作结果分为诊断性(定义为有足够材料进行组织病理学和免疫组织化学检查)或非诊断性。

结果

89例患者(平均年龄:59岁,77%为女性)接受了92次EUS-FNA,使用19G针75次,22G针17次。病变平均大小为22.6mm。总体诊断率为88%。19G针的诊断率高于22G针(92%对70.6%;p=0.0410),对于大于2cm和小于2cm的病变诊断率相似(93.7%对90.7%;p=0.9563)。19G针在穿刺针数<3针时表现最佳。并发症发生率为2.8%。

结论

对于胃固有肌层上皮下病变,使用19G针进行EUS-FNA的诊断率为92%。无论病变大小,对于鉴别GIST和平滑肌瘤都是安全且非常有价值的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f7/6049997/8acfac2ac250/0102-6720-abcd-31-01-e1350-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f7/6049997/8acfac2ac250/0102-6720-abcd-31-01-e1350-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f7/6049997/8acfac2ac250/0102-6720-abcd-31-01-e1350-gf1.jpg

相似文献

1
EUS-FNA WITH 19 OR 22 GAUGES NEEDLES FOR GASTRIC SUBEPITHELIAL LESIONS OF THE MUSCLE LAYER.使用19号或22号针进行超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检术,用于肌层胃黏膜下病变
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018 Jun 21;31(1):e1350. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1350.
2
Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检与细针抽吸活检用于可疑胃肠道间质瘤的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep;86(3):510-515. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
3
Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.22号穿刺针与22号活检针在内镜超声引导下上皮下肿瘤采样中的比较。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;49(3):347-54. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.867361. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
4
Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.影响内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)对上消化道黏膜下或腔外实性肿块病变诊断准确性的因素。
Dig Endosc. 2012 Sep;24(5):358-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01243.x. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
5
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.内镜超声引导下实性胰腺肿块采样:22号穿刺针抽吸与25号活检针活检的比较
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 29;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0352-9.
6
EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.EUS-引导下使用新型叉状针的细针活检采样:一项病例对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Dec;84(6):1034-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.1405. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
7
High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.新型 25 号针在超声内镜引导下对胰腺实性病变 FNA 活检中单次穿刺诊断率高。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):909-15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
8
Randomized crossover trial comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors.比较超声内镜引导下细针穿刺抽吸与超声内镜引导下细针活检用于胃上皮下肿瘤的随机交叉试验。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2018 Mar;46(3):228-233. doi: 10.1002/dc.23872. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.比较22号与25号超声内镜细针穿刺活检针在实性肿块中性能的多中心随机对照试验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;48(7):877-83. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.799222.
10
A 19-Gauge Histology Needle Versus a 19-Gauge Standard Needle in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Randomized Comparison Study (GREATER Study).19 号活检针与 19 号标准针在超声内镜引导下对实体病变进行细针穿刺抽吸的比较:一项多中心随机对照研究(GREATER 研究)。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Apr;63(4):1043-1051. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4913-y. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术用于胃肠道黏膜下病变。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2024 Apr;51(2):195-207. doi: 10.1007/s10396-023-01342-7. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
Franseen Needles May Be Promising for Improving the Sampling Adequacy of EUS-FNA for Subepithelial Lesions.弗兰森针对于提高超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检对上皮下病变的取材充分性可能很有前景。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 9;12(7):1667. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071667.
3
Inflammation-related indicators to distinguish between gastric stromal tumors and leiomyomas: A retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
LAPAROSCOPIC RESECTION OF GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS (GIST).腹腔镜下胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)切除术
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016 Mar;29(1):1-4. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201600010001.
2
Diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle sampling for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.超声内镜引导下针吸活检对上消化道上皮下病变的诊断效能:一项Meta分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2431-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4494-1. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
3
Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.
用于区分胃间质瘤和平滑肌瘤的炎症相关指标:一项回顾性研究。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jan 14;10(2):458-468. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.458.
4
Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with 19-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.19号和22号针内镜超声引导下细针穿刺对实性胰腺病变的比较
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Dec 30;14:10439-10446. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S342525. eCollection 2021.
5
Optimal number of needle punctures in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric subepithelial lesions without rapid on-site evaluation.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检胃黏膜下病变时,在无快速现场评估的情况下,最佳穿刺针数。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2021 Oct;48(4):623-629. doi: 10.1007/s10396-021-01129-8. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
6
Advancements in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.胃黏膜下肿瘤的诊断进展。
Gut Liver. 2022 May 15;16(3):321-330. doi: 10.5009/gnl210242.
7
THE ROLE OF CONVENTIONAL ECHOENDOSCOPY (EUS) IN THERAPEUTIC DECISIONS IN PATIENTS WITH NEUROENDOCRINE GASTROINTESTINAL TUMORS.传统超声内镜检查(EUS)在神经内分泌胃肠道肿瘤患者治疗决策中的作用
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2020;33(2):e1512. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1512. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
内镜超声引导下19G Trucut活检与22G细针穿刺抽吸诊断胃黏膜下肿瘤的产量和效用比较
Clin Endosc. 2015 Mar;48(2):152-7. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.2.152. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
4
Clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for gastric subepithelial lesions smaller than 2 cm.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺对小于2cm胃黏膜下病变的临床应用价值
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Dec;23(4):405-12. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.234.eug.
5
Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.22号穿刺针与22号活检针在内镜超声引导下上皮下肿瘤采样中的比较。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;49(3):347-54. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.867361. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
6
Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study.内镜超声引导下胃黏膜下肿瘤大口径活检:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Oct;24(10):1135-44. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328356eae2.
7
Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline.内镜超声(EUS)引导下取样在胃肠病学中的学习、技术和并发症:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)技术指南。
Endoscopy. 2012 Feb;44(2):190-206. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291543. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
8
Factors Associated with Inadequate Tissue Yield in EUS-FNA for Gastric SMT.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检胃黏膜下肿瘤时组织获取不足的相关因素
ISRN Gastroenterol. 2011;2011:619128. doi: 10.5402/2011/619128. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
9
Clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy results on decision making for patients with gastric subepithelial tumors ≥ 2 cm in diameter.超声内镜引导下 Trucut 活检结果对直径≥2cm 的胃黏膜下肿瘤患者决策的临床影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1010-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.027. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
10
EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using a 19-gauge needle in a selected patient population: a prospective study.EUS 引导下使用 19 号针在选定患者人群中进行细针组织采集:一项前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):504-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.014.