Suppr超能文献

使用迭代条件期望算法对类快速贝叶斯C模型进行基因组预测。

Genomic prediction using an iterative conditional expectation algorithm for a fast BayesC-like model.

作者信息

Dong Linsong, Wang Zhiyong

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea, Ministry of Agriculture; Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian, People's Republic of China.

Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266235, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Genetica. 2018 Oct;146(4-5):361-368. doi: 10.1007/s10709-018-0027-x. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

Abstract

Genomic prediction is feasible for estimating genomic breeding values because of dense genome-wide markers and credible statistical methods, such as Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) and various Bayesian methods. Compared with GBLUP, Bayesian methods propose more flexible assumptions for the distributions of SNP effects. However, most Bayesian methods are performed based on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, leading to computational efficiency challenges. Hence, some fast Bayesian approaches, such as fast BayesB (fBayesB), were proposed to speed up the calculation. This study proposed another fast Bayesian method termed fast BayesC (fBayesC). The prior distribution of fBayesC assumes that a SNP with probability γ has a non-zero effect which comes from a normal density with a common variance. The simulated data from QTLMAS XII workshop and actual data on large yellow croaker were used to compare the predictive results of fBayesB, fBayesC and (MCMC-based) BayesC. The results showed that when γ was set as a small value, such as 0.01 in the simulated data or 0.001 in the actual data, fBayesB and fBayesC yielded lower prediction accuracies (abilities) than BayesC. In the actual data, fBayesC could yield very similar predictive abilities as BayesC when γ ≥ 0.01. When γ = 0.01, fBayesB could also yield similar results as fBayesC and BayesC. However, fBayesB could not yield an explicit result when γ ≥ 0.1, but a similar situation was not observed for fBayesC. Moreover, the computational speed of fBayesC was significantly faster than that of BayesC, making fBayesC a promising method for genomic prediction.

摘要

由于存在全基因组密集标记以及可靠的统计方法,如基因组最佳线性无偏预测(GBLUP)和各种贝叶斯方法,基因组预测对于估计基因组育种值是可行的。与GBLUP相比,贝叶斯方法对单核苷酸多态性(SNP)效应的分布提出了更灵活的假设。然而,大多数贝叶斯方法是基于马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)算法执行的,这导致了计算效率方面的挑战。因此,人们提出了一些快速贝叶斯方法,如快速贝叶斯B(fBayesB),以加快计算速度。本研究提出了另一种快速贝叶斯方法,称为快速贝叶斯C(fBayesC)。fBayesC的先验分布假设,概率为γ的SNP具有非零效应,该效应来自具有共同方差的正态密度。利用QTLMAS XII研讨会的模拟数据和大黄鱼的实际数据,比较了fBayesB、fBayesC和(基于MCMC的)贝叶斯C的预测结果。结果表明,当γ设置为较小值时,如模拟数据中的0.01或实际数据中的0.001,fBayesB和fBayesC的预测准确性(能力)低于贝叶斯C。在实际数据中,当γ≥0.01时,fBayesC可以产生与贝叶斯C非常相似的预测能力。当γ = 0.01时,fBayesB也可以产生与fBayesC和贝叶斯C相似的结果。然而,当γ≥0.1时,fBayesB无法产生明确结果,但fBayesC未观察到类似情况。此外,fBayesC的计算速度明显快于贝叶斯C,这使得fBayesC成为一种有前途的基因组预测方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验