• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

炎症性肠病患者中黑色素瘤筛查的成本效益分析

Cost-Effectiveness of Melanoma Screening in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.

Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Oct;63(10):2564-2572. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5141-1. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-018-5141-1
PMID:29948569
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at increased risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers, and preventive care guidelines in IBD favor annual skin examinations. Here we estimate the cost-effectiveness of annual melanoma screening in IBD.

METHODS

Melanoma screening was defined as receiving annual total body skin examinations starting at age 40 from a dermatologist. Screening was compared to US background total body skin examination rates performed by primary care practitioners. A Markov model was used to estimate intervention costs and effectiveness. Future costs and effectiveness were discounted at 3% per year over a lifetime horizon. Strategies were compared using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

RESULTS

Annual melanoma screening cost an average of $1961 per patient, while no screening cost $81 per patient. Melanoma screening was more effective, gaining 9.2 QALYs per 1000 persons, at a cost of $203,400/QALY gained. Screening every other year was the preferred strategy, gaining 6.2 QALYs per 1000 persons and costing $143,959/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses suggested the relative risk of melanoma in IBD, melanoma progression, and screening costs were most influential with clinically plausible variation, leading to scenarios costing < $100,000/QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested screening every other year was cost-effective in 17.4% of iterations.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for melanoma in IBD patients was effective but expensive. Screening every other year was the most cost-effective strategy. Studies to identify IBD patients at the highest risk of developing melanoma may assist in targeting a prevention program in the most cost-effective manner.

摘要

背景与目的

炎症性肠病(IBD)患者罹患黑色素瘤和非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的风险增加,IBD 的预防保健指南提倡对患者进行年度皮肤检查。本研究旨在评估 IBD 患者中年度黑色素瘤筛查的成本效益。

方法

黑色素瘤筛查定义为 40 岁起每年由皮肤科医生进行全身皮肤检查。将筛查与美国初级保健医生实施的全身皮肤检查率进行比较。采用 Markov 模型估计干预成本和效果。未来成本和效果在终生时间范围内按每年 3%贴现。采用愿意支付 10 万美元/QALY(质量调整生命年)的阈值来比较策略。

结果

每年进行黑色素瘤筛查的患者平均每人花费 1961 美元,而不进行筛查的患者每人花费 81 美元。黑色素瘤筛查更有效,每 1000 人中可获得 9.2 个 QALY,成本为 203400 美元/QALY。每两年筛查一次是更优策略,每 1000 人中可获得 6.2 个 QALY,成本为 143959 美元/QALY。单因素敏感性分析表明,IBD 中黑色素瘤的相对风险、黑色素瘤进展和筛查成本对具有临床意义的变化最具影响力,导致成本效益比低于 10 万美元/QALY 的情况。概率敏感性分析表明,每两年筛查一次在 17.4%的迭代中具有成本效益。

结论

IBD 患者筛查黑色素瘤有效,但费用昂贵。每两年筛查一次是最具成本效益的策略。开展研究以确定黑色素瘤风险最高的 IBD 患者,可能有助于以最具成本效益的方式确定预防方案的目标人群。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Melanoma Screening in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病患者中黑色素瘤筛查的成本效益分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Oct;63(10):2564-2572. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5141-1. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
2
Visual screening for malignant melanoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.恶性黑色素瘤的视觉筛查:一项成本效益分析。
Arch Dermatol. 2007 Jan;143(1):21-8. doi: 10.1001/archderm.143.1.21.
3
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.筛查结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查和其他策略的比较效果和成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
4
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Skin Awareness Intervention for Early Detection of Skin Cancer Targeting Men Older Than 50 Years.针对50岁以上男性的皮肤癌早期检测皮肤意识干预措施的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.017. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
6
Colorectal cancer surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis: an economic evaluation.炎症性肠病和原发性硬化性胆管炎患者的结直肠癌监测:一项经济学评估。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014 Nov;20(11):2046-55. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000181.
7
A Modeling Study of the Cost-Effectiveness of a Risk-Stratified Surveillance Program for Melanoma in the United Kingdom.基于风险分层的英国黑色素瘤监测方案的成本效果建模研究。
Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):658-668. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.009. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
8
A risk-profiling approach for surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease-colorectal carcinoma is more cost-effective: a comparative cost-effectiveness analysis between international guidelines.一种用于炎症性肠病-结直肠癌监测的风险评估方法更具成本效益:国际指南之间的比较成本效益分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Nov;80(5):842-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.1031. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
9
Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.商业保险与医疗保险下结直肠癌筛查的效果和成本效益对比。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1836-1847. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0106-8. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
10
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Maintenance Consensus for Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.成人炎症性肠病健康维护共识
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Oct 18;27(10):1552-1563. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izab155.

本文引用的文献

1
ACG Clinical Guideline: Preventive Care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.美国胃肠病学会临床指南:炎症性肠病的预防保健
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb;112(2):241-258. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.537. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
2
Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.皮肤癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):429-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8465.
3
Effect of Teledermatology on Access to Dermatology Care Among Medicaid Enrollees.远程皮肤病学对医疗补助计划参保者获得皮肤病护理的影响。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):905-12. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0938.
4
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Specialty Medical Home: A New Model of Patient-centered Care.炎症性肠病专科医疗之家:一种以患者为中心的新型护理模式。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 Aug;22(8):1971-80. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000819.
5
Should We Leave the Skin Biopsies to the Dermatologists?我们应该把皮肤活检交给皮肤科医生吗?
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Apr;152(4):371-2. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.5051.
6
Health-Related Utility Weights in a Cohort of Real-World Crohn's Disease Patients.真实世界克罗恩病患者队列中的健康相关效用权重。
J Crohns Colitis. 2015 Dec;9(12):1138-45. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv167. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
7
Prospective evaluation of follow-up in melanoma patients in Germany - results of a multicentre and longitudinal study.德国黑色素瘤患者随访的前瞻性评估——一项多中心纵向研究的结果
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Mar;51(5):653-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
8
Predictors of health-related quality of life and adherence in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: implications for clinical management.克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎患者健康相关生活质量及依从性的预测因素:对临床管理的启示
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 May;60(5):1366-74. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3471-1. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
9
Adherence to medical treatment in inflammatory bowel disease patients.炎症性肠病患者对药物治疗的依从性。
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2014 Dec;60(4):269-74.
10
Risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in ulcerative colitis patients treated with thiopurines: a nationwide retrospective cohort.巯嘌呤类药物治疗溃疡性结肠炎患者的黑素瘤和非黑素瘤皮肤癌风险:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;109(11):1781-93. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.298. Epub 2014 Sep 23.