Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356424, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Aug;63(8):2094-2104. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5148-7.
The cost-effectiveness of screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus continues to evolve as the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma increases, biomarkers enhance the identification of individuals at highest risk for developing cancer, and endoscopic eradication of Barrett's esophagus improves. Screening to detect Barrett's esophagus may be cost-effective in selected high-risk groups based on age, race, sex and other factors such as symptoms of heartburn. Currently, endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia is a cost-effective intervention, while endoscopic therapy for non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus is not a cost-effective strategy. As diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia improves, endoscopic eradication therapy may also prove to be a cost-effective intervention.
随着食管腺癌发病率的增加,巴雷特食管的筛查和监测的成本效益也在不断发展,生物标志物提高了对最高风险患癌个体的识别能力,内镜下消除巴雷特食管的效果也在提高。基于年龄、种族、性别和烧心等其他因素,对特定高危人群进行巴雷特食管筛查可能具有成本效益。目前,内镜下消除巴雷特食管和高级别异型增生的治疗是一种具有成本效益的干预措施,而内镜下治疗非异型增生性巴雷特食管则不是一种具有成本效益的策略。随着对低级别异型增生诊断的改善,内镜下消除治疗也可能被证明是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。