Wang Pei, Zhang Peng, Ma Liangxiao, Yuan Hongwen, Liu Yuqi, Chi Lin, Xin Siyuan, Hu Nijuan, Zhao Minyi, Zhu Jiang
J Tradit Chin Med. 2016 Dec;36(6):711-7. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(17)30004-3.
To analyze the effect of needling acupoints (bilateral vs unilateral) with De Qi using data collected from 501 primary dysmenorrhea (PD) patients participating in multi-center, randomized, controlled trail.
De Qi was defined as at least one of the feelings in soreness, numbness, fullness or heaviness at the acupoints when stimulated with needles. The 501 patients were grouped in 3 groups in terms of De Qi or not De Qi in one side (unilateral) or both sides (bilateral) of the body: bilateral De Qi group, unilateral De Qi group, and non-De Qi group. The abdominal pains were measured using visual analog scale (VAS).
In 501 patients, 472 acquired De Qi at unilateral acupoints, 24 De Qi at bilateral acupoint, and 5 had no De Qi at any acupoint. The data of non-De Qi group was excluded as the sample was less than 5% of that in the bilateral De Qi group. There was significant difference in the VAS before and after treatment between unilateral and bilateral De Qi group (P < 0.01). After stratified by acupoints, for the patients needled at Sanyinjiao (SP 6) and Xuanzhong (GB 39), VAS scores in the bilateral De Qi group were larger than those in the unilateral De Qi group (P < 0.05).
Bilateral De Qi was possibly superior to unilateral De Qi in enhancing the immediate analgesic effect of needling the acupoints, but no statistical significance was observed on the patients of needling at non acupoint, which preliminarily suggested this immediate analgesic effect was perhaps along meridians.
通过对501例参与多中心随机对照试验的原发性痛经(PD)患者收集的数据进行分析,探讨针刺穴位得气(双侧与单侧)的效果。
得气定义为针刺穴位时,穴位处出现酸、麻、胀、重等感觉中的至少一种。501例患者根据身体一侧(单侧)或两侧(双侧)得气与否分为3组:双侧得气组、单侧得气组和未得气组。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量腹痛情况。
501例患者中,472例单侧穴位得气,24例双侧穴位得气,5例任何穴位均未得气。未得气组样本量小于双侧得气组的5%,故排除该组数据。单侧得气组与双侧得气组治疗前后VAS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。按穴位分层后,针刺三阴交(SP 6)和悬钟(GB 39)的患者,双侧得气组VAS评分高于单侧得气组(P<0.05)。
双侧得气在增强针刺穴位即时镇痛效果方面可能优于单侧得气,但针刺非穴位患者未观察到统计学差异,初步提示该即时镇痛效果可能沿经络产生。