• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and implementation of participant safety plans for international research with stigmatised populations.制定和实施针对受污名化人群的国际研究的参与者安全计划。
Lancet HIV. 2018 Aug;5(8):e468-e472. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30073-0. Epub 2018 Jun 24.
2
Reported Participation Benefits in International HIV Prevention Research with People Who Inject Drugs.在针对注射吸毒者的国际艾滋病毒预防研究中报告的参与益处。
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Sep;41(5):28-34. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500030.
3
'Pure' drug users, commercial sex workers and 'ordinary girls': gendered narratives of HIV risk and prevention in post-Soviet Ukraine.“纯”吸毒者、商业性工作者和“普通女孩”:后苏联时代乌克兰的 HIV 风险和预防的性别化叙事。
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Nov;20(11):1171-1184. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1421708. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
5
[Implementation of a continuum of care for people living with HIV/AIDS in Hanoi (Vietnam)].[越南河内为艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者提供连续护理的实施情况]
Sante. 2009 Jul-Sep;19(3):141-8. doi: 10.1684/san.2009.0169.
6
What has been achieved in HIV prevention, treatment and care for people who inject drugs, 2010-2012? A review of the six highest burden countries.2010 - 2012年期间,注射吸毒者在艾滋病毒预防、治疗和护理方面取得了哪些成就?对六个负担最重国家的回顾。
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Jan;25(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
7
Effectiveness of community outreach HIV prevention programs in Vietnam: a mixed methods evaluation.越南社区外展艾滋病毒预防项目的效果:一项混合方法评估。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):1130. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7418-5.
8
Cultural feasibility studies in preparation for clinical trials to reduce maternal-infant HIV transmission in Haiti.为在海地开展减少母婴艾滋病毒传播的临床试验所做的文化可行性研究。
AIDS Educ Prev. 1998 Feb;10(1):46-62.
9
Impacts of stigma on HIV risk for women who inject drugs in Java: A qualitative study.在爪哇注射毒品的妇女中的耻辱感对 HIV 风险的影响:一项定性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Dec;26(12):1244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
10
"We don't need services. We have no problems": exploring the experiences of young people who inject drugs in accessing harm reduction services.“我们不需要服务。我们没有问题”:探索注射毒品的年轻人在获取减少伤害服务方面的经历。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2015 Feb 26;18(2 Suppl 1):19442. doi: 10.7448/IAS.18.2.19442. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Impacts of Multi-City HIV Research Participation Among Sexual and Gender Expansive Individuals in Kazakhstan.哈萨克斯坦性取向和性别认同多元化个体参与多城市艾滋病病毒研究的社会影响
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2025 Feb 24. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003654.
2
Ethical research when abortion access is legally restricted.当堕胎合法受限时的伦理研究。
Science. 2023 Jun 23;380(6651):1224-1226. doi: 10.1126/science.adh3104. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
Reported Participation Benefits in International HIV Prevention Research with People Who Inject Drugs.在针对注射吸毒者的国际艾滋病毒预防研究中报告的参与益处。
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Sep;41(5):28-34. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500030.
4
Ethical challenges in global health-related stigma research.全球健康相关污名研究中的伦理挑战。
BMC Med. 2019 Apr 29;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1317-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Public health and international drug policy.公共卫生与国际药物政策。
Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1427-1480. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00619-X. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
2
Human rights violations against sex workers: burden and effect on HIV.性工作者人权受侵犯:对艾滋病毒的负担和影响。
Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):186-99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60800-X. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
3
Ethical issues in HIV prevention research with people who inject drugs.HIV 预防研究中的伦理问题:针对注射吸毒者的研究
Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):239-45. doi: 10.1177/1740774513505157. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
4
People who use drugs, HIV, and human rights.吸毒人群、艾滋病病毒和人权。
Lancet. 2010 Aug 7;376(9739):475-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60830-6.

制定和实施针对受污名化人群的国际研究的参与者安全计划。

Development and implementation of participant safety plans for international research with stigmatised populations.

机构信息

Berman Institute of Bioethics, School of Medicine, and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Ropes & Gray, Boston, MA, USA; Yale Law School, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Lancet HIV. 2018 Aug;5(8):e468-e472. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30073-0. Epub 2018 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30073-0
PMID:29950284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6889082/
Abstract

People who inject drugs with high-risk sharing practices have high rates of HIV transmission and face barriers to HIV care. Interventions to overcome these barriers are needed; however, stigmatisation of drug use and HIV infection leads to safety concerns during the planning and conduct of research on such interventions. In preparing to address concerns about safety and wellbeing of participants in an international research study, HIV Prevention Trials Network 074, we developed participant safety plans (PSPs) at each site to supplement local research ethics committee oversight, community engagement, and usual clinical trial procedures. The PSPs were informed by systematic local legal and policy assessments, and interviews with key stakeholders. After PSP refinement and implementation, we assessed social impacts at each study visit to ensure continued safety. Throughout the study, five participants reported a negative social impact, with three resulting from study participation. Future research with stigmatised populations should consider using and assessing this approach to enhance safety and welfare.

摘要

具有高危共用行为的吸毒者具有较高的 HIV 传播率,并面临 HIV 护理障碍。需要采取干预措施来克服这些障碍;然而,对吸毒和 HIV 感染的污名化导致在规划和开展此类干预措施的研究时存在安全问题。在为解决对国际研究项目(HIV 预防试验网络 074)参与者安全和福祉的担忧做准备时,我们在每个地点制定了参与者安全计划(PSP),以补充当地研究伦理委员会监督、社区参与和常规临床试验程序。PSP 的制定依据是系统的当地法律和政策评估以及与主要利益相关者的访谈。在 PSP 细化和实施后,我们在每次研究访问时评估社会影响,以确保持续安全。在整个研究过程中,有五名参与者报告了负面的社会影响,其中三人是由于参与研究造成的。未来针对污名化人群的研究应考虑使用和评估这种方法,以增强安全性和福利。