Sex and racial disparities in fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention utilization: a 5-year national experience.
作者信息
Desai Rupak, Mirza Omer, Sachdeva Rajesh, Kumar Gautam
机构信息
Division of Cardiology, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
出版信息
Ann Transl Med. 2018 May;6(10):198. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.15.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Sex and racial disparities in fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention utilization: a 5-year national experience.血流储备分数指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗应用中的性别和种族差异：一项为期5年的全国性经验。
Ann Transl Med. 2018 May;6(10):198. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.15.
2
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.多支血管病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血流储备分数与血管造影的比较：多支血管评估血流储备分数与血管造影（FAME）研究的 2 年随访。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 28.
3
The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy.性别差异对血流储备分数指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响：FAME（血流储备分数与多血管评估的血管造影）子研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(10):1037-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.016.
4
Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation).稳定性冠心病患者中血流储备分数指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床结局和成本效益：多血管评估的 FAME 2 试验（血流储备分数与血管造影比较）的 3 年随访结果。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 30;137(5):480-487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031907. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
5
The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.年龄对血流储备分数指导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响：FAME（血流储备分数与血管造影术用于多支血管评估）试验的一项子研究
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 15;177(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
6
Cost utility of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease in Brazil.巴西多支冠状动脉疾病中血流储备分数指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本效用。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30;31(9):676-681. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy240.
7
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization).血流储备分数指导下的完全血运重建改善 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并严重非罪犯病变患者的预后：DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI 子研究（ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：仅治疗罪犯病变还是完全血运重建）
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004460.
8
Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支血管评估血流储备分数与血管造影术对比研究（FAME）3试验的原理与设计：多支冠状动脉疾病患者中血流储备分数引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较
Am Heart J. 2015 Oct;170(4):619-626.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
9
Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease.多支血管病变患者中血流储备分数指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的经济学评价。
Circulation. 2010 Dec 14;122(24):2545-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.925396. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
10
The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: Insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial.左心室射血分数对血流储备分数的影响：来自FAME（血流储备分数与血管造影术用于多支血管评估）试验的见解。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;204:206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.169. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
引用本文的文献
1
Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality in Hospitalized Frail Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的住院虚弱患者的死亡率结局及预测因素
Cureus. 2019 Aug 16;11(8):e5399. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5399.
2
Temporal Trends in the Prevalence of Diabetes Decompensation (Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State) Among Adult Patients Hospitalized with Diabetes Mellitus: A Nationwide Analysis Stratified by Age, Gender, and Race.糖尿病失代偿（糖尿病酮症酸中毒和高渗高血糖状态）在成年糖尿病住院患者中的流行时间趋势：一项按年龄、性别和种族分层的全国性分析
Cureus. 2019 Apr 1;11(4):e4353. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4353.
3
Racial and sex disparities in resource utilization and outcomes of multi-vessel percutaneous coronary interventions (a 5-year nationwide evaluation in the United States).多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中资源利用及治疗结果的种族和性别差异（美国一项为期5年的全国性评估）
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019 Feb;9(1):18-29. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2018.09.02.
本文引用的文献
1
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease.临界血流储备分数指导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与稳定型冠心病的药物治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
2
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.血流储备分数与血管造影术在指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
Zotero 插件