相似文献
1
Sex and racial disparities in fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention utilization: a 5-year national experience.
Ann Transl Med. 2018 May;6(10):198. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.15.
2
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 28.
3
The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(10):1037-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.016.
4
Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation).
Circulation. 2018 Jan 30;137(5):480-487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031907. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
5
The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 15;177(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
6
Cost utility of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease in Brazil.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30;31(9):676-681. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy240.
7
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004460.
8
Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Am Heart J. 2015 Oct;170(4):619-626.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
9
Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease.
Circulation. 2010 Dec 14;122(24):2545-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.925396. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
10
The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: Insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;204:206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.169. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
引用本文的文献
1
Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality in Hospitalized Frail Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Cureus. 2019 Aug 16;11(8):e5399. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5399.
2
3
Racial and sex disparities in resource utilization and outcomes of multi-vessel percutaneous coronary interventions (a 5-year nationwide evaluation in the United States).
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019 Feb;9(1):18-29. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2018.09.02.
本文引用的文献
1
Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
2
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
Zotero 插件