Suppr超能文献

正中剖腹术后切口疝的发生

Development of incisional herniation after midline laparotomy.

作者信息

Harlaar J J, Deerenberg E B, Dwarkasing R S, Kamperman A M, Kleinrensink G J, Jeekel J, Lange J F

机构信息

Department of Surgery Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2017 May 10;1(1):18-23. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.3. eCollection 2017 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional herniation is a common complication after abdominal surgery associated with considerable morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine whether incisional hernia is an early complication, in order to understand better the aetiology of incisional hernia formation.

METHODS

This study involved the secondary analysis of a subset of patients included in a large RCT comparing small and large tissue bites (5 mm every 5 mm, or 1 cm every 1 cm) in patients scheduled to undergo elective abdominal surgery by midline laparotomy. The distance between the rectus abdominis muscles (RAM distance) was measured by standardized ultrasound imaging 1 month and 1 year after surgery. The relationship between the 1-year incidence of incisional hernia and the RAM distance at 1 month was investigated.

RESULTS

Some 219 patients were investigated, 113 in the small-bites and 106 in the large-bites group. At 1 month after surgery the RAM distance was smaller for small bites than for large bites (mean(s.d.) 1·90(1·18) versus 2·39(1·34) cm respectively; P = 0·005). At 1 year, patients with incisional hernia had a longer RAM distance at 1 month than those with no incisional hernia (mean(s.d.) 2·43(1·48) versus 2·03(1·19) cm respectively; relative risk 1·14, 95 per cent c.i. 1·03 to 1·26, P = 0·015).

CONCLUSION

A RAM distance greater than 2 cm at 1 month after midline laparotomy is associated with incisional hernia. Closure with small bites results in a smaller distance between the muscles.

摘要

背景

切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症,会导致相当高的发病率。本研究的目的是确定切口疝是否为早期并发症,以便更好地理解切口疝形成的病因。

方法

本研究对一项大型随机对照试验中的部分患者进行了二次分析,该试验比较了计划接受中线剖腹术的择期腹部手术患者采用小组织咬合法(每5毫米咬5毫米,即每1厘米咬1厘米)和大组织咬合法的效果。术后1个月和1年通过标准化超声成像测量腹直肌间距(RAM间距)。研究了1年切口疝发病率与1个月时RAM间距之间的关系。

结果

共调查了219例患者,小组织咬合法组113例,大组织咬合法组106例。术后1个月,小组织咬合法组的RAM间距小于大组织咬合法组(分别为平均(标准差)1.90(1.18)厘米和2.39(1.34)厘米;P = 0.005)。1年时,有切口疝的患者1个月时的RAM间距比无切口疝的患者长(分别为平均(标准差)2.43(1.48)厘米和2.03(1.19)厘米;相对风险1.14,95%置信区间1.03至1.26,P = 0.015)。

结论

中线剖腹术后1个月时RAM间距大于2厘米与切口疝相关。采用小组织咬合法缝合会使肌肉间距离更小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d0a/5989969/8df83093f3ce/BJS5-1-18-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验