Suppr超能文献

一项评估小缝线对中线切口切口疝发生率影响的多中心随机对照试验。

A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions.

作者信息

Harlaar Joris J, Deerenberg Eva B, van Ramshorst Gabrielle H, Lont Harold E, van der Borst Ed C M H, Schouten Willem R, Heisterkamp Joos, van Doorn Helena C, Cense Huib A, Berends Frits, Stockmann Hein B A C, Vrijland Wietske W, Consten Esther C J, Ottow Reyer T, Go Peter M N Y H, Hermans John J, Steyerberg Ewout W, Lange Johan F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2011 Aug 26;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The median laparotomy is frequently used by abdominal surgeons to gain rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to nerves, vascular structures and muscles of the abdominal wall. However, incisional hernia remains the most common complication after median laparotomy, with reported incidences varying between 2-20%. Recent clinical and experimental data showed a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only, is possibly more effective in the prevention of incisional hernia when compared to the common used large bite technique or mass closure.

METHODS/DESIGN: The STITCH trial is a double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to compare a standardized large bite technique with a standardized small bites technique. The main objective is to compare both suture techniques for incidence of incisional hernia after one year. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative complications, direct costs, indirect costs and quality of life. A total of 576 patients will be randomized between a standardized small bites or large bites technique. At least 10 departments of general surgery and two departments of oncological gynaecology will participate in this trial. Both techniques have a standardized amount of stitches per cm wound length and suture length wound length ratio's are calculated in each patient. Follow up will be at 1 month for wound infection and 1 year for incisional hernia. Ultrasound examinations will be performed at both time points to measure the distance between the rectus muscles (at 3 points) and to objectify presence or absence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded during follow up, although the surgeon can not be blinded during the surgical procedure.

CONCLUSION

The STITCH trial will provide level 1b evidence to support the preference for either a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only or for the commonly used large bites technique.

摘要

背景

腹部外科医生经常采用正中剖腹术,以便在对腹壁神经、血管结构和肌肉造成最小损伤的情况下,迅速、广泛地进入腹腔。然而,切口疝仍是正中剖腹术后最常见的并发症,报道的发生率在2%至20%之间。最近的临床和实验数据表明,与常用的大咬合法或整块缝合相比,仅在腱膜上采用许多小组织咬合的连续缝合技术在预防切口疝方面可能更有效。

方法/设计:STITCH试验是一项双盲多中心随机对照试验,旨在比较标准化大咬合法与标准化小咬合法。主要目的是比较两种缝合技术在一年后切口疝的发生率。次要结果将包括术后并发症、直接成本、间接成本和生活质量。共有576名患者将被随机分为标准化小咬合法或大咬合法。至少10个普通外科科室和2个肿瘤妇科科室将参与这项试验。两种技术每厘米伤口长度的缝线数量均标准化,并计算每位患者的缝线长度与伤口长度之比。随访时间为术后1个月检查伤口感染情况,1年检查切口疝情况。两个时间点均进行超声检查,测量腹直肌之间的距离(在3个点),并确定是否存在切口疝。随访期间患者、研究者和放射科医生将保持盲态,尽管外科医生在手术过程中不能保持盲态。

结论

STITCH试验将提供1b级证据,以支持仅在腱膜上采用许多小组织咬合的连续缝合技术或常用的大咬合法中的哪一种更具优势。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Are eviscerations preventable?脏器脱出能否预防?
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2025 Feb 21;52:e20253814. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20253814-en. eCollection 2025.
10
Development of incisional herniation after midline laparotomy.正中剖腹术后切口疝的发生
BJS Open. 2017 May 10;1(1):18-23. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.3. eCollection 2017 Feb.

本文引用的文献

2
Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias.原发性及切口性腹壁疝的分类
Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x. Epub 2009 Jun 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验