Sport, Health and Exercise Science, School of Life Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
School of Sport, York St John University, York, United Kingdom; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Mar;34(3):728-737. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002715.
Orange, ST, Metcalfe, JW, Marshall, P, Vince, RV, Madden, LA, and Liefeith, A. Test-retest reliability of a commercial linear position transducer (GymAware PowerTool) to measure velocity and power in the back squat and bench press. J Strength Cond Res 34(3): 728-737, 2020-This study examined the test-retest reliability of the GymAware PowerTool (GYM) to measure velocity and power in the free-weight back squat and bench press. Twenty-nine academy rugby league players (age: 17.6 ± 1.0 years; body mass: 87.3 ± 20.8 kg) completed 2 test-retest sessions for the back squat followed by 2 test-retest sessions for the bench press. GYM measured mean velocity (MV), peak velocity (PV), mean power (MP), and peak power at 20, 40, 60, 80, and 90% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). GYM showed good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] and standard error of measurement percentage, respectively) for the measurement of MV at loads of 40 (0.77, 3.9%), 60 (0.83, 4.8%), 80 (0.83, 5.8%), and 90% (0.79, 7.9%) of 1RM in the back squat. In the bench press, good reliability was evident for PV at 40 (0.82, 3.9%), 60 (0.81, 5.1%), and 80% (0.77, 8.4%) of 1RM, and for MV at 80 (0.78, 7.9%) and 90% (0.87, 9.9%) of 1RM. The measurement of MP showed good to excellent levels of reliability across all relative loads (ICC ≥0.75). In conclusion, GYM provides practitioners with reliable kinematic information in the back squat and bench press, at least with loads of 40-90% of 1RM. This suggests that strength and conditioning coaches can use the velocity data to regulate training load according to daily readiness and target specific components of the force-velocity curve. However, caution should be taken when measuring movement velocity at loads <40% of 1RM.
橙色,ST,梅特卡夫,JW,马歇尔,P,文斯,RV,马登,LA 和利费斯,A. 商业线性位置传感器(GymAware PowerTool)测量深蹲和卧推速度和功率的重测信度。J 力量与调理研究 34(3):728-737,2020 年-本研究考察了 GymAware PowerTool(GYM)测量自由重量深蹲和卧推时速度和功率的重测信度。29 名学院橄榄球联盟球员(年龄:17.6 ± 1.0 岁;体重:87.3 ± 20.8 千克)完成了 2 次深蹲的重测测试,随后完成了 2 次卧推的重测测试。GYM 测量了平均速度(MV)、峰值速度(PV)、平均功率(MP)和在 1 重复最大(1RM)的 20%、40%、60%、80%和 90%时的峰值功率。GYM 显示出在深蹲时测量 40%(0.77,3.9%)、60%(0.83,4.8%)、80%(0.83,5.8%)和 90%(0.79,7.9%)的 1RM 时 MV 的良好可靠性(组内相关系数 [ICC]和测量误差百分比)。在卧推中,在 40%(0.82,3.9%)、60%(0.81,5.1%)和 80%(0.77,8.4%)的 1RM 时,PV 和在 80%(0.78,7.9%)和 90%(0.87,9.9%)的 1RM 时 MV 的测量均具有良好到优秀的可靠性。MP 的测量在所有相对负荷下均显示出良好到优秀的可靠性(ICC≥0.75)。总之,GYM 为深蹲和卧推提供了可靠的运动学信息,至少在 40-90%的 1RM 范围内。这表明力量和调理教练可以使用速度数据根据日常准备情况调节训练负荷,并针对力-速度曲线的特定组件进行目标训练。然而,在测量负荷<40%的 1RM 时的运动速度时应谨慎。