Li Tao, Li Wei, Du Yong, Gao Meng, Liu Xiaoyang, Wang Guodong, Cui Haomin, Jiang Zhensong, Cui Xingang, Sun Jianmin
Department of Spine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University Department of Orthopedics, Qingyun County People's Hospital, Jinan City, PR China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11195. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011195.
Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for distinguishing between pyogenic spondylitis and brucellar spondylitis.Although pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) and brucellar spondylitis (BS) are common causes of spinal infections, the variety of their clinical manifestations complicates differential diagnosis. MRI may be helpful in differential diagnosis and treatment.MRI images of 64 patients who underwent MRI of the spine and with confirmed spondylitis were retrospectively reviewed. After referring to the related medical literature, we compared 32 patients with pyogenic spondylitis and 32 patients with brucellar spondylitis regarding MRI findings. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi-square test. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.The significant differences between PS and BS on MRI findings are listed as follows (P < .05): diffuse, partial and fan-shaped hyperintense signals on middle sagittal fat-suppressed weighted images (PS: 51, 11, 3/65 vs BS:35, 18, 19/72); focal endplate destruction (PS: 9/43 vs BS:27/35); extensive end plate destruction (PS: 29/43 vs BS:8/35); ballooning change of the intravertebral space (PS: 7/32 vs BS:0/32); an inflammatory reaction line from the end plate (PS: 30/65 vs BS: 1/72); a disc invasion sign (PS: 1/28 vs BS:12/33); an inflammatory reaction line in the disc (PS: 5/28 vs BS:25/33); and 8) severe intravertebral space destruction (PS: 17/28 vs BS:12/33);MRI imaging provides useful information for the differentiation between pyogenic spondylitis and brucellar spondylitis.
回顾性横断面研究。本研究旨在探讨磁共振成像(MRI)在鉴别化脓性脊柱炎和布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎方面的准确性。虽然化脓性脊椎间盘炎(PS)和布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎(BS)是脊柱感染的常见病因,但其临床表现多样,使鉴别诊断变得复杂。MRI可能有助于鉴别诊断和治疗。对64例接受脊柱MRI检查且确诊为脊柱炎的患者的MRI图像进行回顾性分析。参考相关医学文献后,我们比较了32例化脓性脊柱炎患者和32例布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎患者的MRI表现。采用卡方检验进行统计分析。统计学显著性定义为P<0.05。PS和BS在MRI表现上的显著差异如下(P<0.05):在矢状位脂肪抑制加权像上弥漫性、局灶性和扇形高信号(PS:51、11、3/65 vs BS:35、18、19/72);局灶性终板破坏(PS:9/43 vs BS:27/35);广泛终板破坏(PS:29/43 vs BS:8/35);椎间隙气球样改变(PS:7/32 vs BS:0/32);来自终板的炎性反应线(PS:30/65 vs BS:1/72);椎间盘侵犯征(PS:1/28 vs BS:12/33);椎间盘内炎性反应线(PS:5/28 vs BS:25/33);以及严重椎间隙破坏(PS:17/28 vs BS:12/33);MRI成像为鉴别化脓性脊柱炎和布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎提供了有用信息。