Zeng Xianling, Zhang Yafei, Yang Lei, Xu Huiqiu, Zhang Taohong, An Ruifang, Zhu Kexiu
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011251.
Available data concerning the association between RAD51 135G/C (rs1801320) polymorphism and the risk of 3 common gynecological cancers still could not reach a consensus. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the relationship.
Several electronic databases and bibliographies of relevant articles were screened to identify the studies up to July 2017. Then a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the connection between 3 common gynecological tumors' susceptibility and RAD51 135G/C polymorphism in different inheritance models. Simultaneously, we did subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis if necessary.
A total of 11 articles including 14 studies involving 4097 cases and 5890 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, RAD51 135G/C polymorphism increased the risk of 3 common gynecological tumors. The subgroup analysis stratified by cancer types- endometrial carcinoma (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC)-showed that RAD51 135G/C polymorphism increased the risk of EC: allele model (C vs G: odds ratio [OR] = 4.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.63-7.10, P < .00001), dominant model (CC + GC vs GG: OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.44-3.60, P = .004), recessive model (CC vs GC + GG: OR = 10.27, 95% CI = 14.71-22.38, P < .00001), and homozygous model (CC vs GG: OR = 7.26, 95% CI = 3.59-14.68, P < .00001), but there was no significant association between RAD51 135G/C polymorphism and OC. In the subgroup analysis stratified by source of controls, a significantly increased risk was observed in hospital-based studies. Nevertheless, the data showed RAD51 135G/C polymorphism had no link in population-based studies.
This meta-analysis suggested that RAD51 135G/C polymorphism was a risk factor for the three common gynecological tumors, especially for EC among hospital-based populations.
关于RAD51 135G/C(rs1801320)多态性与3种常见妇科癌症风险之间关联的现有数据仍未达成共识。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析以探究二者关系。
检索了多个电子数据库及相关文章的参考文献,以确定截至2017年7月的研究。然后进行荟萃分析,评估不同遗传模型下3种常见妇科肿瘤易感性与RAD51 135G/C多态性之间的联系。必要时,我们还进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析。
本荟萃分析共纳入11篇文章,包含14项研究,涉及4097例病例和5890例对照。总体而言,RAD51 135G/C多态性增加了3种常见妇科肿瘤的风险。按癌症类型(子宫内膜癌(EC)和卵巢癌(OC))分层的亚组分析显示,RAD51 135G/C多态性增加了EC的风险:等位基因模型(C与G:比值比[OR]=4.32,95%置信区间[CI]=2.63 - 7.10,P<0.00001)、显性模型(CC + GC与GG:OR=2.28,95% CI=1.44 - 3.60,P=0.004)、隐性模型(CC与GC + GG:OR=10.27,95% CI=14.71 - 22.38,P<0.00001)以及纯合子模型(CC与GG:OR=7.26,95% CI=3.59 - 14.68,P<0.00001),但RAD51 135G/C多态性与OC之间无显著关联。在按对照来源分层的亚组分析中,基于医院的研究中观察到风险显著增加。然而,数据显示基于人群的研究中RAD51 135G/C多态性无关联。
本荟萃分析表明,RAD51 135G/C多态性是3种常见妇科肿瘤的危险因素,尤其是在基于医院的人群中对EC而言。