• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预光照测试前的日光暴露对皮肤类型 III、IV 和 V 中的最小红斑剂量和最小黑素生成剂量的影响。

The effect of pre-phototest sun exposure on minimal erythema dose and minimal melanogenic dose among skin phototypes III, IV and V.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018 Nov;34(6):400-404. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12410. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1111/phpp.12410
PMID:29953669
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ethnicity, skin phototype and colour influenced minimal erythema dose (MED). Sun exposure has been postulated to increase MED. We determined immediate pigment darkening dose to UVA (IPDDA), MED and minimal melanogenic dose (MMD) for UVB and UVA, and investigated factors affecting these doses.

METHODS

Skin phototype was determined using Fitzpatrick phototype quiz, DSMII ColorMeter measured skin colours, sun exposure quantified using an index (SEI) and phototest performed with MEDlight-Multitester.

RESULTS

A total of 167 healthy volunteers participated. There were 110 (66%) females and 56 (34%) males; 124 (74.7%) were Malay, 27 (16.3%) Chinese and 14 (8.4%) Indians. One hundred and nine (65.7%) skin phototype IV, 30 (18.1%) phototype III and 27 (16.3%) phototype V. IPDDA ranges from 6 ± 1.5-5.7 ± 1.4 J/cm . MED-UVB were 96.9 ± 17.6, 124 ± 29.3 and 118.6 ± 27.4 mJ/cm for phototype III, IV and V, respectively. All MED-UVA were outside the tested dose range of 3.6-11 J/cm . MMD-UVB were 106 ± 18.2, 134 ± 25.6 and 136 ± 31.1 mJ/cm while MMD-UVA were 4.1 ± 4.1, 4.9 ± 3.8 and 5.7 ± 3.7 J/cm respectively for phototypes III, IV and V. MED-UVB, MMD-UVB and MMD-UVA did not depend on skin phototype. Facultative skin whiteness (L*), erythema (E) and melanin content (M) correlated significantly with MED-UVB while constitutive skin colours were significant for L*, yellowness (b*), E and M. Sun exposure did not significantly correlate with MED-UVB and MMDs, however, an inverse relationship with MED-UVB was demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Minimal erythema doses in our cohort were slightly different from other regional countries. Constitutive and facultative skin whiteness, erythema and melanin content correlated with MED. There was no association between skin phototype and sun exposure with MED or MMD.

摘要

背景

种族、肤色和肤色类型会影响最小红斑剂量(MED)。据推测,日光照射会增加 MED。本研究旨在确定中波紫外线(UVB)和长波紫外线(UVA)的即刻色素沉着增强剂量(IPDDA)、MED 和最小色素生成剂量(MMD),并探讨影响这些剂量的因素。

方法

采用 Fitzpatrick 皮肤光型问卷确定皮肤光型,DSMII 比色计测量皮肤颜色,日光暴露指数(SEI)量化日光暴露,使用 MEDlight-Multitester 进行光测试。

结果

共有 167 名健康志愿者参与了本研究。其中,女性 110 名(66%),男性 56 名(34%);124 名(74.7%)为马来人,27 名(16.3%)为华人,14 名(8.4%)为印度人。109 名志愿者的皮肤光型为 IV 型(65.7%),30 名志愿者为 III 型(18.1%),27 名志愿者为 V 型(16.3%)。IPDDA 范围为 6±1.5-5.7±1.4 J/cm。MED-UVB 分别为 96.9±17.6、124±29.3 和 118.6±27.4 mJ/cm,用于 III、IV 和 V 型皮肤光型。所有 MED-UVA 均超出 3.6-11 J/cm 的测试剂量范围。MMD-UVB 分别为 106±18.2、134±25.6 和 136±31.1 mJ/cm,而 MMD-UVA 分别为 4.1±4.1、4.9±3.8 和 5.7±3.7 J/cm,用于 III、IV 和 V 型皮肤光型。MED-UVB、MMD-UVB 和 MMD-UVA 与皮肤光型无关。中波紫外线 MED 与皮肤的 facultative 白皙度(L*)、红斑(E)和黑色素含量(M)显著相关,而固有肤色与 L*、黄度(b*)、E 和 M 显著相关。日光暴露与 MED-UVB 和 MMDs 无显著相关性,但与 MED-UVB 呈负相关。

结论

本研究队列中的最小红斑剂量与其他地区国家略有不同。固有和 facultative 皮肤白皙度、红斑和黑色素含量与 MED 相关。皮肤光型和日光暴露与 MED 或 MMD 之间无关联。

相似文献

1
The effect of pre-phototest sun exposure on minimal erythema dose and minimal melanogenic dose among skin phototypes III, IV and V.预光照测试前的日光暴露对皮肤类型 III、IV 和 V 中的最小红斑剂量和最小黑素生成剂量的影响。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018 Nov;34(6):400-404. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12410. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
2
Objective determination of Fitzpatrick skin type.客观确定菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型。
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Aug;57(8):B4153.
3
The minimal erythema dose of broadband ultraviolet B in Taiwanese.台湾地区人群中宽带紫外线B的最小红斑量。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2007 Nov;106(11):975-8. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60071-6.
4
The minimal melanogenesis dose/minimal erythema dose ratio declines with increasing skin pigmentation using solar simulator and narrowband ultraviolet B exposure.采用太阳模拟器和窄谱中波紫外线照射,最小黑色素生成剂量/最小红斑剂量比值随皮肤色素沉着增加而降低。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2010 Jun;26(3):133-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2010.00508.x.
5
The relationship of skin color, UVB-induced erythema, and melanogenesis.皮肤颜色、紫外线B诱导的红斑与黑素生成之间的关系。
J Invest Dermatol. 1985 Apr;84(4):265-7. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12265342.
6
Evaluation of the minimal erythema dose for UVB and UVA in context of skin phototype and nature of photodermatosis.评估 UVB 和 UVA 的最小红斑剂量与皮肤光型和光皮病性质的关系。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2020 May;36(3):200-207. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12537. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Pigment protection factor as a predictor of skin photosensitivity--a Polish study.色素保护因子作为皮肤光敏感性的预测指标——一项波兰的研究。
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2015;23(1):23-7.
8
Could colorimetric method replace the individual minimal erythemal dose (MED) measurements in determining the initial dose of narrow-band UVB treatment for psoriasis patients with skin phototype III-V?比色法能否替代个体最小红斑量(MED)测量来确定皮肤光型 III-V 的银屑病患者接受窄谱中波紫外线治疗的初始剂量?
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Apr;27(4):494-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04471.x. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
9
Chinese women with melasma exhibit a low minimal erythema dose to both UVA and UVB.患有黄褐斑的中国女性对UVA和UVB的最小红斑剂量都较低。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2022 Jan;38(1):38-43. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12713. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
10
Assessment of skin types, skin colours and cutaneous responses to ultraviolet radiation in an Asian population.亚洲人群皮肤类型、肤色及对紫外线辐射的皮肤反应评估。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1997 Oct-Dec;13(5-6):169-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.1997.tb00223.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Unravelling the determinants of human health in French Polynesia: the MATAEA project.探究法属波利尼西亚人类健康的决定因素:MATAEA项目。
Front Epidemiol. 2023 Nov 27;3:1201038. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1201038. eCollection 2023.
2
Ultraviolet diagnostic and treatment modalities in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行中的紫外线诊断和治疗方式。
Clin Dermatol. 2021 May-Jun;39(3):446-450. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Feb 1.