Suppr超能文献

新型经口胆道镜下胆管病变分类系统的诊断准确性和可靠性。

Reliability and accuracy of a novel classification system using peroral cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of bile duct lesions.

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Division, Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas (IECED), Guayaquil, Ecuador.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2018 Nov;50(11):1059-1070. doi: 10.1055/a-0607-2534. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to propose a novel, comprehensive, macroscopic classification for bile duct lesions.

METHODS

A two-stage protocol was designed. In Stage I, a retrospective study (September 2013 to September 2015) of patients with bile duct lesions detected by peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) was performed. A total of 315 images with at least 6 months of follow-up were recorded, analyzed, and correlated to histology, and were classified as non-neoplastic (one of three types, 1 - 3) or neoplastic (one of four types, 1 - 4) based on morphological and vascular patterns. In Stage II, a prospective, nonrandomized, double-blind study was performed from December 2015 to December 2016 to validate the proposed classification. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + and LR - , respectively) were calculated (gold standard: 6-month follow-up). Inter- and intraobserver agreement (kappa value, κ) among experts and non-experts were calculated.

RESULTS

171 patients were included (65 retrospective; 106 prospective). In Stage I, 28/65 cases were neoplastic and 37 /65 were non-neoplastic, according to the final diagnosis. In Stage II, 56/106 were neoplastic with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR + , and LR - for neoplastic diagnosis of 96.3 %, 92.3 %, 92.9 %, 96 %, 12.52, and 0.04, respectively. The proposed classification presented high reproducibility among observers, for both neoplastic and subtypes categories. However, it was better for experts (κ > 80 %) than non-experts (κ 64.7 % - 81.9 %).

CONCLUSION

The novel classification system could help physicians to distinguish non-neoplastic from neoplastic bile duct lesions.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在提出一种新颖的、全面的、宏观的胆管病变分类方法。

方法

采用两阶段方案。在第一阶段,对经口胆管镜检查(POCS)发现的胆管病变患者进行回顾性研究(2013 年 9 月至 2015 年 9 月)。共记录了 315 张至少有 6 个月随访的图像,并对其进行分析,与组织学相关联,并根据形态学和血管模式将其分为非肿瘤性(三种类型之一,1-3)或肿瘤性(四种类型之一,1-4)。在第二阶段,于 2015 年 12 月至 2016 年 12 月进行了前瞻性、非随机、双盲研究,以验证所提出的分类。计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性和阴性似然比(LR+和 LR-)(金标准:6 个月随访)。计算了专家和非专家之间的观察者间和观察者内一致性(kappa 值,κ)。

结果

共纳入 171 例患者(65 例回顾性;106 例前瞻性)。在第一阶段,根据最终诊断,65 例病例中有 28 例为肿瘤性,37 例为非肿瘤性。在第二阶段,106 例中有 56 例为肿瘤性,对肿瘤性诊断的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV、LR+和 LR-分别为 96.3%、92.3%、92.9%、96%、12.52 和 0.04。该分类方法在观察者中具有很高的可重复性,对于肿瘤性和亚型分类均如此。然而,它对专家(κ>80%)的效果优于非专家(κ为 64.7%-81.9%)。

结论

新的分类系统有助于医生区分非肿瘤性和肿瘤性胆管病变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验