Suppr超能文献

前臂方位对肱二头肌肌腱力学及屈肘肌力量稳定性的影响。

Influence of forearm orientation on biceps brachii tendon mechanics and elbow flexor force steadiness.

作者信息

Smart Rowan R, Kohn Sienna, Richardson Cydney M, Jakobi Jennifer M

机构信息

Healthy Exercise and Aging Lab, School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.

Healthy Exercise and Aging Lab, School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2018 Jul 25;76:129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.039. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

Abstract

Achilles tendon mechanics influence plantar flexion force steadiness (FS) and balance. In the upper limb, elbow flexor FS is greater in supinated and neutral forearm orientations compared to pronated, with contributions of tendon mechanics remaining unknown in position-dependent FS. This study investigated whether distal biceps brachii (BB) tendon mechanics across supinated, neutral and pronated forearm orientations influence position-dependent FS of the elbow flexors. Eleven males (23 ± 3 years) performed submaximal isometric elbow flexion tasks at low (5, 10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)) and high (25, 50, 75% MVC) force levels in supinated, neutral and pronated forearm orientations. Distal BB tendon elongation and CSA were recorded on ultrasound to calculate mechanics of tendon stress, strain and stiffness. Relationships between FS, calculated as coefficient of variation (CV) of force, and tendon mechanics were evaluated with multiple regressions. Supinated and neutral were ∼50% stronger and ∼60% steadier than pronated (p < 0.05). Tendon stress was ∼52% greater in supinated and neutral compared to pronated, tendon strain was ∼36% greater in neutral than pronated (p < 0.05), while tendon stiffness (267.4 ± 78.9 N/mm) did not differ across orientations (p > 0.05). At low forces, CV of force was predicted by MVC (r: 0.52) in supinated, and MVC and stress in neutral and pronated (r: 0.65-0.81). At high force levels, CV of force was predicted by MVC and stress in supinated (r: 0.49), and MVC in neutral (r: 0.53). Absolute strength and tendon mechanics influence the ability of the BB tendon to distribute forces, and thus are key factors in position-dependent FS.

摘要

跟腱力学影响跖屈力稳定性(FS)和平衡。在上肢,与旋前位相比,旋后位和中立位时肘屈肌的FS更大,而肌腱力学在位置依赖性FS中的作用尚不清楚。本研究调查了肱二头肌远端(BB)肌腱在旋后、中立和旋前前臂位的力学是否影响肘屈肌的位置依赖性FS。11名男性(23±3岁)在旋后、中立和旋前前臂位以低(5%、10%最大自主收缩(MVC))和高(25%、50%、75% MVC)力水平进行次最大等长肘屈任务。通过超声记录BB肌腱远端的伸长和横截面积,以计算肌腱应力、应变和刚度的力学参数。以力的变异系数(CV)计算的FS与肌腱力学之间的关系通过多元回归进行评估。旋后位和中立位比旋前位力量强约50%,稳定性高约60%(p<0.05)。与旋前位相比,旋后位和中立位的肌腱应力约高52%,中立位的肌腱应变比旋前位约大36%(p<0.05),而肌腱刚度(267.4±78.9 N/mm)在不同体位间无差异(p>0.05)。在低力量时,旋后位力的CV由MVC预测(r:0.52),中立位和旋前位由MVC和应力预测(r:0.65 - 0.81)。在高力量水平时,旋后位力的CV由MVC和应力预测(r:0.49),中立位由MVC预测(r:0.53)。绝对力量和肌腱力学影响BB肌腱分配力量的能力,因此是位置依赖性FS的关键因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验