Smart Rowan R, O'Connor Brian, Jakobi Jennifer M
Healthy Exercise and Aging Laboratory, School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Front Physiol. 2021 Sep 27;12:654231. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.654231. eCollection 2021.
Force produced by the muscle during contraction is applied to the tendon and distributed through the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the tendon. This ratio of force to the tendon CSA is quantified as the tendon mechanical property of stress. Stress is traditionally calculated using the resting tendon CSA; however, this does not take into account the reductions in the CSA resulting from tendon elongation during the contraction. It is unknown if calculating the tendon stress using instantaneous CSA during a contraction significantly increases the values of distal biceps brachii (BB) tendon stress in humans compared to stress calculated with the resting CSA. Nine young (22 ± 1 years) and nine old (76 ± 4 years) males, and eight young females (21 ± 1 years) performed submaximal isometric elbow flexion tracking tasks at force levels ranging from 2.5 to 80% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). The distal BB tendon CSA was recorded on ultrasound at rest and during the submaximal tracking tasks (instantaneous). Tendon stress was calculated as the ratio of tendon force during contraction to CSA using the resting and instantaneous measures of CSA, and statistically evaluated with multi-level modeling (MLM) and Johnson-Neyman regions of significance tests to determine the specific force levels above which the differences between calculation methods and groups became statistically significant. The tendon CSA was greatest at rest and decreased as the force level increased ( < 0.001), and was largest in young males (23.0 ± 2.90 mm) followed by old males (20.87 ± 2.0 mm) and young females (17.08 ± 1.54 mm) ( < 0.001) at rest and across the submaximal force levels. Tendon stress was greater in the instantaneous compared with the resting CSA condition, and young males had the greatest difference in the values of tendon stress between the two conditions (20 ± 4%), followed by old males (19 ± 5%), and young females (17 ± 5%). The specific force at which the difference between the instantaneous and resting CSA stress values became statistically significant was 2.6, 6.6, and 10% MVC for old males, young females, and young males, respectively. The influence of using the instantaneous compared to resting CSA for tendon stress is sex-specific in young adults, and age-specific in the context of males. The instantaneous CSA should be used to provide a more accurate measure of tendon stress in humans.
肌肉收缩时产生的力作用于肌腱,并通过肌腱的横截面积(CSA)进行分布。力与肌腱CSA的这一比值被量化为肌腱的应力力学特性。传统上,应力是使用静息肌腱CSA来计算的;然而,这并未考虑到收缩过程中由于肌腱伸长导致的CSA减小。与使用静息CSA计算的应力相比,在收缩过程中使用瞬时CSA计算肌腱应力是否会显著提高人类肱二头肌远端(BB)肌腱应力的值尚不清楚。九名年轻男性(22±1岁)、九名老年男性(76±4岁)和八名年轻女性(21±1岁)进行了次最大等长屈肘跟踪任务,力水平范围为最大自主收缩(MVC)的2.5%至80%。在静息状态和次最大跟踪任务期间(瞬时),通过超声记录远端BB肌腱CSA。肌腱应力通过收缩期间的肌腱力与CSA的比值来计算,分别使用CSA的静息和瞬时测量值,并通过多级建模(MLM)和约翰逊-内曼显著性区域检验进行统计学评估,以确定计算方法和组间差异在统计学上变得显著的具体力水平。肌腱CSA在静息时最大,随着力水平的增加而减小(<0.001),在静息状态和次最大力水平下,年轻男性的肌腱CSA最大(23.0±2.90平方毫米),其次是老年男性(20.87±2.0平方毫米)和年轻女性(17.08±1.54平方毫米)(<0.001)。与静息CSA条件相比,瞬时条件下的肌腱应力更大,年轻男性在两种条件下的肌腱应力值差异最大(20±4%),其次是老年男性(19±5%)和年轻女性(17±5%)。对于老年男性、年轻女性和年轻男性,瞬时和静息CSA应力值之间的差异在统计学上变得显著的具体力分别为2.6%、6.6%和10%MVC。在年轻人中,与使用静息CSA相比,使用瞬时CSA计算肌腱应力的影响具有性别特异性,在男性中具有年龄特异性。应使用瞬时CSA来更准确地测量人类的肌腱应力。