Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 28;7(13):e009174. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009174.
We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of young patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) versus obstructive disease (myocardial infarction due to coronary artery disease [MI-CAD]) and among patients with MINOCA by sex and subtype.
Between 2008 and 2012, VIRGO (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients) prospectively enrolled acute myocardial infarction patients aged 18 to 55 years in 103 hospitals at a 2:1 ratio of women to men. Using an angiographically driven taxonomy, we defined patients as having MI-CAD if there was revascularization or plaque ≥50% and as having MINOCA if there was <50% obstruction or a nonplaque mechanism. Patients who did not have an angiogram or who received thrombolytics before an angiogram were excluded. Outcomes included 1- and 12-month mortality and functional (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]) and psychosocial status. Of 2690 patients undergoing angiography, 2374 (88.4%) had MI-CAD, 299 (11.1%) had MINOCA, and 17 (0.6%) remained unclassified. Women had 5 times higher odds of having MINOCA than men (14.9% versus 3.5%; odds ratio: 4.84; 95% confidence interval, 3.29-7.13). MINOCA patients were more likely to be without traditional cardiac risk factors (8.7% versus 1.3%; <0.001) but more predisposed to hypercoaguable states than MI-CAD patients (3.0% versus 1.3%; =0.036). Women with MI-CAD were more likely than those with MINOCA to be menopausal (55.2% versus 41.2%; <0.001) or to have a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (16.8% versus 11.0%; =0.028). The MINOCA mechanisms varied: a nonplaque mechanism was identified for 75 patients (25.1%), and their clinical profiles and management also varied. One- and 12-month mortality with MINOCA and MI-CAD was similar (1-month: 1.1% and 1.7% [=0.43]; 12-month: 0.6% and 2.3% [=0.68], respectively), as was adjusted 12-month SAQ quality of life (76.5 versus 73.5, respectively; =0.06).
Young patients with MINOCA were more likely women, had a heterogeneous mechanistic profile, and had clinical outcomes that were comparable to those of MI-CAD patients.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00597922.
我们比较了伴有非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(MINOCA)的年轻心肌梗死患者与阻塞性疾病(由冠状动脉疾病引起的心肌梗死[MI-CAD])的临床特征和结局,以及 MINOCA 患者按性别和亚型的分组情况。
2008 年至 2012 年,VIRGO(年轻急性心肌梗死患者中性别对预后的影响:与血管重建相关的研究)前瞻性纳入了 103 家医院的年龄在 18 至 55 岁的急性心肌梗死患者,男女比例为 2:1。根据血管造影驱动的分类,我们将有血管重建或斑块≥50%的患者定义为 MI-CAD,将无<50%阻塞或非斑块机制的患者定义为 MINOCA。未进行血管造影或在血管造影前接受溶栓治疗的患者被排除在外。研究终点包括 1 个月和 12 个月死亡率以及功能(西雅图心绞痛问卷[SAQ])和心理社会状态。在接受血管造影的 2690 例患者中,2374 例(88.4%)为 MI-CAD,299 例(11.1%)为 MINOCA,17 例(0.6%)无法分类。女性发生 MINOCA 的可能性是男性的 5 倍(14.9%对 3.5%;比值比:4.84;95%置信区间:3.29-7.13)。MINOCA 患者更可能没有传统的心脏危险因素(8.7%对 1.3%;<0.001),但与 MI-CAD 患者相比,更易发生高凝状态(3.0%对 1.3%;=0.036)。MI-CAD 女性患者更可能处于绝经后状态(55.2%对 41.2%;<0.001)或有妊娠糖尿病史(16.8%对 11.0%;=0.028)。MINOCA 的发病机制各不相同:75 例(25.1%)为非斑块机制,其临床特征和治疗方法也各不相同。MINOCA 和 MI-CAD 的 1 个月和 12 个月死亡率相似(1 个月:1.1%和 1.7%[=0.43];12 个月:0.6%和 2.3%[=0.68]),调整后的 12 个月 SAQ 生活质量也相似(分别为 76.5 和 73.5;=0.06)。
伴有 MINOCA 的年轻患者更可能为女性,其发病机制具有异质性,且临床结局与 MI-CAD 患者相当。