Suppr超能文献

非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死的患病率、临床因素及预后。

Prevalence, Clinical Factors, and Outcomes Associated With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery.

机构信息

From the University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus, Duluth, MN.

Essentia Health Heart and Vascular Center, Duluth, MN.

出版信息

Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;20(2):108-113. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000249.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is an underrecognized clinical problem in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Various clinical disorders lead to MINOCA thus making treatment and diagnosis a challenge. We aimed to compare the clinical factors and outcomes of patients with MINOCA versus obstructive disease [myocardial infarction due to coronary artery disease (MI-CAD)] in a largely rural health system.

METHODS

Between May 1, 2009 and June 24, 2019, all consecutive ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients at Essentia Health were prospectively examined. We categorized patients into MI-CAD (obstructive plaque ≥ 50% with revascularization) or MINOCA (obstructive plaque < 50% with exclusion of other alternative cause). Outcomes included 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality, 30-day all-cause readmission and 30-day cardiac readmission.

RESULTS

There were 2170 patients included in the study; 2097 (96.6 %) had MI-CAD and 73 (3.4%) met the definition of MINOCA. Within the MINOCA group, the 3 most common presentations were supply-demand mismatch (28.8%), spontaneous coronary artery dissection (9.6%), and other etiology (60.3%). Only 10 (13 %) MINOCA patients had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies obtained within 6 months. MINOCA patients were younger 61.6 versus 63.4 years with higher left ventricular function 51.6% versus 50.4% with less likelihood of prior myocardial infarction 4.1% versus 15.5% or congestive heart failure 2.7% versus 6.3% (P < 0.05). Compared with MI-CAD patients, MINOCA patients had similar 30-day mortality (7.1% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.70), 1-year mortality (10.4% vs. 8.2 %; P = 0.55), and 30-day cardiac readmission (8.7% vs. 9.6%; P = 0.29). MINOCA patients were less likely to be discharged on aspirin, betablockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers, or statins (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Though there was no difference in readmission and mortality between MINOCA and MI-CAD; use of secondary prevention medications and cardiac rehabilitation referral was low in MINOCA patients. Prospective studies will be relevant to assess effective medical therapy to improve outcomes in MINOCA patients.

摘要

背景

非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死(MINOCA)是急性冠脉综合征患者中一种未被充分认识的临床问题。各种临床疾病导致 MINOCA,从而使治疗和诊断成为挑战。我们旨在比较在一个以农村为主的医疗系统中,MINOCA 患者(因冠状动脉疾病导致的心肌梗死[MI-CAD])与阻塞性疾病患者的临床因素和结局。

方法

2009 年 5 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 24 日,埃森提亚健康中心对所有连续的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行前瞻性检查。我们将患者分为 MI-CAD(阻塞性斑块≥50%且进行了血运重建)或 MINOCA(阻塞性斑块<50%且排除其他替代病因)。结局包括 30 天和 1 年全因死亡率、30 天全因再入院率和 30 天心脏再入院率。

结果

研究共纳入 2170 例患者;2097 例(96.6%)为 MI-CAD,73 例(3.4%)符合 MINOCA 定义。在 MINOCA 组中,最常见的三种表现为供需不匹配(28.8%)、自发性冠状动脉夹层(9.6%)和其他病因(60.3%)。只有 10 例(13%)MINOCA 患者在 6 个月内进行了心脏磁共振成像检查。MINOCA 患者年龄较小(61.6 岁 vs. 63.4 岁),左心室功能较好(51.6% vs. 50.4%),既往心肌梗死发生率较低(4.1% vs. 15.5%)或充血性心力衰竭发生率较低(2.7% vs. 6.3%)(P<0.05)。与 MI-CAD 患者相比,MINOCA 患者的 30 天死亡率(7.1% vs. 8.2%;P=0.70)、1 年死亡率(10.4% vs. 8.2%;P=0.55)和 30 天心脏再入院率(8.7% vs. 9.6%;P=0.29)相似。MINOCA 患者出院时更可能未使用阿司匹林、β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂或他汀类药物(P<0.05)。

结论

尽管 MINOCA 和 MI-CAD 之间在再入院率和死亡率方面没有差异,但 MINOCA 患者的二级预防药物和心脏康复转介的使用较低。前瞻性研究将有助于评估有效的药物治疗,以改善 MINOCA 患者的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验