Suppr超能文献

高水平足球运动员下肢损伤后缺乏标准化的结局评估方法:一项系统评价。

The lack of standardized outcome measures following lower extremity injury in elite soccer: a systematic review.

机构信息

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St, Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):3109-3117. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5032-1. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Sport-specific, performance-based outcomes are increasingly used to improve evaluation of treatment efficacy in elite athletes; however, its usage in elite soccer may be limited. The purpose of this investigation is to (1) assess current outcome reporting in elite soccer; (2) identify any variability in reporting of outcomes; and (3) determine how sport-specific performance-based outcomes are utilized to assess treatment efficacy in elite soccer.

METHODS

A systematic review of the Pubmed, MEDLINE, and Embase, Scopus, SportDiscus, CINAHL and HealthSource: Nursing databases was performed without limitation on publication year. Inclusion criteria were (1) reporting of outcomes after a (2) lower extremity injury in (3) elite soccer players. The study's population, type of injury, return to play, as well as functional, objective, and sport-specific performance-based outcomes were extracted from each article. The methodological index for nonrandomized studies was used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were selected after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Objective outcomes were reported by 6 (29%) studies, and 6 (29%) employed patient-reported outcomes. The visual analog scale, Lysholm, and Tegner scores were the most common patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Return to play was reported by 18 (86%) studies, and only 2 (10%) utilized sport-specific performance-based outcomes. Despite the majority of studies reporting return to play, variation was seen in the definitions, and 15 (71%) studies reported the activity level of the players at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of treatment efficacy is limited in elite athletes, and PROs lack the sensitivity to identify residual performance deficits after an injury. Although performance-based measures are available at the elite level, these outcomes were seldom used for evaluation of treatment efficacy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When treating elite soccer players, patient-reported outcome measures lack the sensitivity to detect changes in patient function, thus performance-based metrics may be more efficacious in assessing return from injury in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

目的

运动专项、基于表现的结果越来越多地用于提高精英运动员治疗效果的评估;然而,在精英足球中其应用可能受到限制。本研究的目的是:(1)评估精英足球中当前的结果报告;(2)确定结果报告的任何差异;(3)确定如何利用运动专项、基于表现的结果来评估精英足球中的治疗效果。

方法

对 Pubmed、MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、SportDiscus、CINAHL 和 HealthSource:Nursing 数据库进行了系统的综述,没有对出版年份进行限制。纳入标准为:(1)报告下肢损伤后的结果;(2)在精英足球运动员中。从每篇文章中提取研究人群、损伤类型、重返赛场以及功能、客观和运动专项、基于表现的结果。非随机研究的方法学指数用于质量评估。

结果

应用纳入和排除标准后,选择了 21 项研究。有 6 项(29%)研究报告了客观结果,6 项(29%)采用了患者报告的结果。视觉模拟评分、Lysholm 和 Tegner 评分是最常见的患者报告结局(PROs)。18 项(86%)研究报告了重返赛场,只有 2 项(10%)使用了运动专项、基于表现的结果。尽管大多数研究报告了重返赛场,但在定义上存在差异,15 项(71%)研究报告了最终随访时运动员的活动水平。

结论

在精英运动员中,治疗效果的评估受到限制,PROs 缺乏在受伤后识别残留运动缺陷的敏感性。尽管在精英水平上有基于表现的测量方法,但这些结果很少用于评估治疗效果。

临床相关性

在治疗精英足球运动员时,患者报告的结局测量缺乏检测患者功能变化的敏感性,因此基于表现的指标可能更有效地评估这些患者的受伤后恢复情况。

证据水平

IV。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验