Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital UZBrussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Nov;39(11):4462-4470. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24285. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a potential treatment strategy for mood and anxiety disorders, but how this application may influence emotional processes, and whether this is related to individual characteristics, is not well understood. It has been proposed that perceived criticism (PC) may represent a vulnerability factor for the development of such mental illnesses. To decipher whether neural mechanisms of action of tDCS potentially differ depending on PC status (low vs. high), we evaluated mood and brain perfusion before and after applying MRI-compatible tDCS, and after participants were exposed to verbal criticism in the scanner. Experimental design 30 healthy nondepressed females were included in a sham-controlled crossover MRI-compatible tDCS study. Brain perfusion was measured by means of arterial spin labeling (ASL) before and after tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and after hearing criticism. Before the experiment, all participants provided a rating of PC in their closest environment. Principal observations at the behavioral level, criticism made participants angrier. This was unrelated to the active or sham stimulation. After being criticized, females scoring high on PC had significantly decreased brain perfusion in the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pgACC) and medioprefrontal cortex (mPFC), after active tDCS but not sham. The decrease in pgACC/mPFC perfusion points to a significant impact of tDCS in brain areas related to stress responses and self-referential processes, especially in females scoring high on PC, which has been shown to be related to vulnerability for mood and anxiety disorders.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种治疗情绪和焦虑障碍的潜在策略,但这种应用如何影响情绪过程,以及这是否与个体特征有关,目前还不太清楚。有人提出,感知到的批评(PC)可能代表了发展这些精神疾病的脆弱因素。为了解释 tDCS 的神经作用机制是否可能因 PC 状态(低 vs. 高)而不同,我们在应用 MRI 兼容 tDCS 前后以及参与者在扫描仪中受到言语批评后评估了情绪和大脑灌注。实验设计 30 名健康、无抑郁的女性被纳入 sham 对照交叉 MRI 兼容 tDCS 研究。在 tDCS 应用于左侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)前后,以及在听到批评后,通过动脉自旋标记(ASL)测量大脑灌注。在实验之前,所有参与者都对他们最亲近的环境中的 PC 进行了评分。行为水平上的主要观察结果是,批评使参与者更加愤怒。这与主动或 sham 刺激无关。在受到批评后,PC 评分较高的女性在接受主动 tDCS 后,前扣带回皮质(pgACC)和中前额皮质(mPFC)的大脑灌注明显减少,但 sham 组则没有。pgACC/mPFC 灌注的减少表明 tDCS 对与应激反应和自我参照过程相关的大脑区域产生了重大影响,尤其是在 PC 评分较高的女性中,这与情绪和焦虑障碍的易感性有关。