• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线自评测试加入结直肠癌筛查中可以提高家族性癌症风险评估的效果,而不会增加苦恼。

An online self-test added to colorectal cancer screening can increase the effectiveness of familial cancer risk assessment without increasing distress.

机构信息

Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;20(10):897-904. doi: 10.1111/codi.14319. Epub 2018 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1111/codi.14319
PMID:29956442
Abstract

AIM

Most people who are at increased familial colorectal cancer (FCRC) risk are not identified, despite the need for enhanced surveillance colonoscopy for effective CRC prevention. An online self-test may enhance this identification. We assessed whether taking an online self-test to identify increased FCRC risk increases anxiety, distress or CRC risk perception in population-based CRC screening.

METHOD

After the precolonoscopy consultation, patients who had a positive immunohistochemical occult faecal blood test (iFOBT+) in population-based CRC screening were invited by email to take an online self-test at home which returned details of family history. Anxiety (STAI-DY), distress (HADS) and CRC risk perception were assessed immediately before and after taking the online self-test and 2 weeks later.

RESULTS

Of 250 participants invited, 177 (71%) completed the online self-test and psychological questionnaires and 153 (61%) completed questionnaires 2 weeks later. The median age was 65 years (range 61-75). The FCRC risk was increased in 17 participants (9.6%). Of these, 12 (6.8%) had a highly increased FCRC risk and may benefit from germline genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. In 7 of 17 participants (40%) the self-test obtained novel information on family history. Anxiety and distress levels were, and remained, below a clinically relevant level. Perception of CRC risk remained unchanged. Most participants (83%) would recommend the online self-test to others.

CONCLUSION

Of those with a iFOBT+, 9.6% had a previously unidentified increasedFCRC risk and require an enhanced surveillance colonoscopy instead of iFOBT. As screening for this risk did not increase anxiety or distress, and was highly acceptable, we recommend adding the online self-test to population-based CRC screening.

摘要

目的

尽管需要进行增强型结肠镜检查以有效预防结直肠癌(CRC),但仍有许多具有结直肠家族性癌症(FCRC)高危风险的人未被识别。在线自测可能有助于识别这些风险。我们评估了在基于人群的 CRC 筛查中,进行在线自测以识别增加的 FCRC 风险是否会增加焦虑、困扰或对 CRC 风险的感知。

方法

在结肠镜检查前的咨询后,通过电子邮件邀请在基于人群的 CRC 筛查中免疫组化法粪便隐血试验(iFOBT+)阳性的患者在家中进行在线自测,该自测将详细了解家族史。在进行在线自测前后以及 2 周后,立即评估焦虑(STAI-DY)、困扰(HADS)和 CRC 风险感知。

结果

在 250 名受邀参与者中,177 名(71%)完成了在线自测和心理问卷,153 名(61%)在 2 周后完成了问卷。中位年龄为 65 岁(范围为 61-75 岁)。17 名参与者(9.6%)的 FCRC 风险增加。其中 12 名(6.8%)具有高度增加的 FCRC 风险,可能受益于林奇综合征的种系基因检测。在 17 名参与者中的 7 名(40%)中,自测获得了家族史的新信息。焦虑和困扰水平仍然处于临床相关水平以下。对 CRC 风险的感知保持不变。大多数参与者(83%)会向他人推荐在线自测。

结论

在 iFOBT+的人群中,9.6%的人具有先前未识别的增加的 FCRC 风险,需要进行增强型结肠镜检查,而不是 iFOBT。由于筛查这种风险并未增加焦虑或困扰,并且非常被接受,因此我们建议在基于人群的 CRC 筛查中增加在线自测。

相似文献

1
An online self-test added to colorectal cancer screening can increase the effectiveness of familial cancer risk assessment without increasing distress.在线自评测试加入结直肠癌筛查中可以提高家族性癌症风险评估的效果,而不会增加苦恼。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;20(10):897-904. doi: 10.1111/codi.14319. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
2
Online self-test identifies women at high familial breast cancer risk in population-based breast cancer screening without inducing anxiety or distress.在线自我检测可在基于人群的乳腺癌筛查中识别出具有高家族性乳腺癌风险的女性,且不会引发焦虑或困扰。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jun;78:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
3
Adding familial risk assessment to faecal occult blood test can increase the effectiveness of population-based colorectal cancer screening.将家族风险评估添加到粪便潜血试验中可以提高基于人群的结直肠癌筛查的效果。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jul;47(10):1571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.01.022. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
4
Evaluation of an online family history tool for identifying hereditary and familial colorectal cancer.用于识别遗传性和家族性结直肠癌的在线家族史工具评估
Fam Cancer. 2018 Jul;17(3):371-380. doi: 10.1007/s10689-017-0041-7.
5
Colorectal screening using the immunochemical faecal occult blood test kit among the Malaysian cohort participants.采用免疫化学粪便潜血试验试剂盒对马来西亚队列参与者进行结直肠癌筛查。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;65:101656. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.101656. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Evaluating the effects of a risk-adapted screening program for familial colorectal cancer in individuals between 25 and 50 years of age: study protocol for the prospective population-based intervention study FARKOR.评估 25 至 50 岁人群中家族性结直肠癌风险适应筛查方案的效果:前瞻性基于人群的干预研究 FARKOR 的研究方案。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 May 5;20(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01247-6.
7
Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.接受结直肠癌症筛查假阳性结果的心理社会后果:一项定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):145-154. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608040. Epub 2019 May 11.
8
Validation of an online questionnaire for identifying people at risk of familial and hereditary colorectal cancer.用于识别家族性和遗传性结直肠癌高危人群的在线调查问卷的验证
Fam Cancer. 2015 Sep;14(3):401-10. doi: 10.1007/s10689-015-9792-1.
9
Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants individuals not invited.结直肠癌筛查的心理影响:未被邀请的参与者个体
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 21;22(43):9631-9641. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9631.
10
Revised Australian national guidelines for colorectal cancer screening: family history.澳大利亚结直肠癌筛查国家指南修订版:家族史。
Med J Aust. 2018 Nov 19;209(10):455-460. doi: 10.5694/mja18.00142. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions.风险分层肠道筛查的范围综述:当前证据,未来方向。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 May;33(5):653-685. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9. Epub 2022 Mar 20.