• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌筛查的心理影响:未被邀请的参与者个体

Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants individuals not invited.

作者信息

Kirkøen Benedicte, Berstad Paula, Botteri Edoardo, Bernklev Linn, El-Safadi Badboni, Hoff Geir, de Lange Thomas, Bernklev Tomm

机构信息

Benedicte Kirkøen, Paula Berstad, Edoardo Botteri, Geir Hoff, Thomas de Lange, Department of bowel cancer screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Majorstuen, 0304 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 21;22(43):9631-9641. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9631.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9631
PMID:27920484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5116607/
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the possible long-term psychological harm of participating in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Norway.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized trial, 14294 participants (aged 50-74 years) were invited to either flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening, or a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) (1:1). In total, 4422 screening participants (32%) completed the questionnaire, which consisted of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the SF-12, a generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurement, when invited to screening and one year after the invitation. A control group of 7650 individuals was invited to complete the questionnaire only, at baseline and one year after, and 1911 (25%) completed the questionnaires.

RESULTS

Receiving a positive or negative screening result and participating in the two different screening modalities did not cause clinically relevant mean changes in anxiety, depression or HRQOL after one year. FS screening, but not FIT, was associated with an increased probability of being an anxiety case (score ≥ 8) at the one-year follow-up (5.6% of FS participants transitioned from being not anxious to anxious, while 3.0% experienced the reverse). This increase was moderately significantly different from the changes in the control group (in which the corresponding numbers were 4.8% and 4.5%, respectively), = 0.06.

CONCLUSION

Most individuals do not experience psychological effects of CRC screening participation after one year, while FS participation is associated with increased anxiety for a smaller group.

摘要

目的

调查在挪威参与结直肠癌(CRC)筛查可能产生的长期心理伤害。

方法

在一项前瞻性随机试验中,14294名参与者(年龄在50 - 74岁之间)被邀请接受乙状结肠镜检查(FS)筛查或粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)(比例为1:1)。共有4422名筛查参与者(32%)在被邀请参加筛查时以及邀请后一年完成了问卷,问卷包括医院焦虑抑郁量表和SF - 12,这是一种通用的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)测量工具。一个由7650人组成的对照组被邀请仅在基线时和一年后完成问卷,1911人(25%)完成了问卷。

结果

在一年后,收到阳性或阴性筛查结果以及参与两种不同的筛查方式并未导致焦虑、抑郁或HRQOL出现具有临床意义的平均变化。在一年随访时,FS筛查(而非FIT)与成为焦虑症患者(得分≥8)的概率增加相关(5.6%的FS参与者从不焦虑转变为焦虑,而3.0%经历相反情况)。这一增加与对照组的变化(相应数字分别为4.8%和4.5%)有中度显著差异,P = 0.06。

结论

大多数人在参与CRC筛查一年后未出现心理影响,而对于较小一部分群体,参与FS筛查与焦虑增加有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc38/5116607/a97b2d1375f5/WJG-22-9631-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc38/5116607/ef37c89b1822/WJG-22-9631-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc38/5116607/1a765bdc3804/WJG-22-9631-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc38/5116607/a97b2d1375f5/WJG-22-9631-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc38/5116607/ef37c89b1822/WJG-22-9631-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc38/5116607/1a765bdc3804/WJG-22-9631-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc38/5116607/a97b2d1375f5/WJG-22-9631-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants individuals not invited.结直肠癌筛查的心理影响:未被邀请的参与者个体
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 21;22(43):9631-9641. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9631.
2
Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.勿施伤害:结直肠癌筛查无心理伤害。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;114(5):497-504. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.14. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
3
What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?影响人们决定参与粪便潜血试验和乙状结肠镜检查进行结直肠癌筛查的因素有哪些?
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(10):2321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
4
Changes in health behavior 1 year after testing negative at a colorectal cancer screening: a randomized-controlled study.结直肠癌筛查结果呈阴性1年后的健康行为变化:一项随机对照研究。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jul;27(4):316-322. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000328.
5
Screening for colorectal cancer: comparison of perceived test burden of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test and flexible sigmoidoscopy.结直肠癌筛查:愈创木脂粪便潜血试验、粪便免疫化学试验和乙状结肠镜检查的检测负担感知比较。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Jul;46(11):2059-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.022. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
6
Acceptability of two colorectal cancer screening tests: pain as a key determinant in sigmoidoscopy.两种结直肠癌筛查检测的可接受性:疼痛是乙状结肠镜检查的关键决定因素。
Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1075-1086. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-117400. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
Invitation strategies for colorectal cancer screening programmes: The impact of an advance notification letter.结直肠癌筛查项目的邀请策略:提前通知信的影响
Prev Med. 2015 Apr;73:106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
8
Quality of life in participants of a CRC screening program.结直肠癌筛查项目参与者的生活质量。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Oct 9;107(8):1295-301. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.386. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
9
Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的心理困扰和生活质量。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):1084-1091. doi: 10.1002/pon.5381. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
10
Offering people a choice for colorectal cancer screening.为结直肠癌筛查提供选择。
Gut. 2013 May;62(5):735-40. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301013. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Health utility assessments in individuals undergoing diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopy: improved discrimination with a cancer-specific scale.在接受诊断性和监测性结肠镜检查的个体中进行健康效用评估:使用癌症特异性量表可提高区分度。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Feb;35(2):347-357. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01789-6. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
Methodological Quality of PROMs in Psychosocial Consequences of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.结直肠癌筛查心理社会后果中患者报告结局测量指标的方法学质量:一项系统评价
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2023 Mar 14;14:31-47. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S394247. eCollection 2023.
3
The psychological impact of esophageal cancer screening on anxiety and depression in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.勿施伤害:结直肠癌筛查无心理伤害。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;114(5):497-504. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.14. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
Psychological stress in patients with anal fistula.肛瘘患者的心理压力
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Aug;30(8):1123-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2245-3. Epub 2015 May 15.
3
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
食管癌筛查对中国焦虑和抑郁的心理影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 20;13:933678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.933678. eCollection 2022.
4
Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review.与癌症筛查相关的患者报告结局:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09261-5.
5
Waiting for diagnostic colonoscopy: a qualitative exploration of screening participants' experiences in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.等待诊断性结肠镜检查:对基于粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查项目中筛查参与者经历的质性探索
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 May 17;12:845-852. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S154959. eCollection 2018.
6
Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Role of Psychological, Social and Background Factors in Decision-making Process.结直肠癌筛查:心理、社会及背景因素在决策过程中的作用
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2018 Mar 21;14:63-69. doi: 10.2174/1745017901814010063. eCollection 2018.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
4
The structure and demographic correlates of cancer fear.癌症恐惧的结构及其人口统计学相关因素。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 16;14:597. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-597.
5
Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial.结肠镜筛查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Aug 13;312(6):606-15. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.8266.
6
The psychological impact of participating in colorectal cancer screening by faecal immuno-chemical testing--the Australian experience.粪便免疫化学检测筛查结直肠癌对参与者心理的影响——澳大利亚的经验。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug 26;111(5):970-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.371. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
7
Psychological distress after a positive fecal occult blood test result among members of an integrated healthcare delivery system.综合医疗服务系统成员中阳性粪便潜血检测结果后的心理困扰。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jan;23(1):154-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0722. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
8
Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals.无症状个体中,柔性乙状结肠镜检查与粪便潜血检测用于结直肠癌筛查的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 1;2013(9):CD009259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009259.pub2.
9
FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy.在结直肠癌筛查中,粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)假阳性会导致患者在结肠镜检查后长达 6 周经历心理困扰。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Oct;21(10):2809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1867-7. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
10
Quality of life in participants of a CRC screening program.结直肠癌筛查项目参与者的生活质量。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Oct 9;107(8):1295-301. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.386. Epub 2012 Sep 6.