• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“Jay-Dar”现象:个体仅凭照片就能辨别大麻使用者和非使用者。

The "Jay-Dar" Phenomenon: Individuals Discriminate Cannabis Users from Nonusers Based Upon a Photograph.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Palo Alto University , Palo Alto , California , USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Dec 6;53(14):2359-2367. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1474228. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1080/10826084.2018.1474228
PMID:29958041
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With increasing legalization of medicinal and recreational cannabis, use is on the rise. Research suggests individuals may be able to guess cannabis user status based upon appearance; however, these findings utilized a small sample of photographs that was not balanced on user status or gender. Further, no studies examined whether raters with cannabis experience are better at judging others' cannabis use, or what physical features they use to make these judgments. This study explored these factors using a larger, balanced photograph database.

METHOD

An American sample (n = 249, 48.6% female, mean age = 35.19 years) rated 36 photographs (18 cannabis users, 18 nonusers) balanced on gender and age on the likelihood that the photographed individuals use cannabis, producing 8964 ratings. Respondents also reported physical features considered in their ratings, as well as their own cannabis use history.

RESULTS

As hypothesized, photographs of users received higher ratings on the Marijuana Use Likelihood Index relative to nonusers. Further, results revealed a gender by rater user status interaction, indicating that raters with no previous cannabis experience rated males higher than females, while raters with cannabis experience did not demonstrate this rating discrepancy. Cannabis use explained over 9% of the variance in ratings across all photographs.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest individuals do rate cannabis users as more likely to be users, relative to nonusers, based upon appearance alone. These findings have important implications, not only for research on chronic cannabis use effects, but also for social and achievement factors such as potential stigma.

摘要

目的

随着医用和娱乐用大麻合法化程度的提高,其使用量也在上升。研究表明,人们可能能够根据外表来猜测大麻使用者的身份;然而,这些发现使用的照片样本较小,且在使用者身份和性别方面不平衡。此外,没有研究检验是否有大麻使用经验的评估者更善于判断他人的大麻使用情况,或者他们使用哪些身体特征来做出这些判断。本研究使用更大、平衡的照片数据库来探讨这些因素。

方法

一项美国样本(n=249,48.6%为女性,平均年龄=35.19 岁)对 36 张照片(18 名大麻使用者,18 名非使用者)进行了评估,这些照片在性别和年龄上平衡,评估了照片中个体使用大麻的可能性,共产生了 8964 个评分。受访者还报告了他们在评分中考虑的身体特征,以及他们自己的大麻使用史。

结果

正如假设的那样,使用者的照片在大麻使用可能性指数上的评分高于非使用者。此外,结果显示了评估者使用者身份的性别与评估者之间的交互作用,表明没有以前大麻使用经验的评估者对男性的评分高于女性,而有大麻使用经验的评估者则没有表现出这种评分差异。大麻使用情况解释了所有照片评分中超过 9%的差异。

结论

结果表明,个体仅凭外表就会将大麻使用者评定为更有可能使用大麻,而不是非使用者。这些发现不仅对慢性大麻使用影响的研究具有重要意义,而且对社会和成就因素(如潜在的污名)也具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
The "Jay-Dar" Phenomenon: Individuals Discriminate Cannabis Users from Nonusers Based Upon a Photograph.“Jay-Dar”现象:个体仅凭照片就能辨别大麻使用者和非使用者。
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Dec 6;53(14):2359-2367. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1474228. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
2
Determining Cannabis Use Status From a Photograph: An Assessment of the "Jay-dar" in Neuropsychologists.从照片判断大麻使用状况:对神经心理学家的“识麻雷达”评估
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Feb 23;52(3):401-410. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1233564. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
3
Don't Judge a Book by its Cover: Examiner Expectancy Effects Predict Neuropsychological Performance for Individuals Judged as Chronic Cannabis Users.勿以貌取人:被判断为慢性大麻使用者的个体的神经心理学表现可由检查者预期效应预测。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Nov 1;33(7):821-831. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx114.
4
In the weeds: a baseline view of cannabis use among legalizing states and their neighbours.乱象丛生:合法化州及其周边地区大麻使用情况的基线观察
Addiction. 2016 Jun;111(6):973-80. doi: 10.1111/add.13282. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
5
A Survey of Cannabis Acute Effects and Withdrawal Symptoms: Differential Responses Across User Types and Age.大麻急性效应与戒断症状调查:不同用户类型和年龄的差异反应
J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Mar;25(3):326-335. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0319. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
6
Recreational Cannabis Use Before and After Legalization in Women With Pelvic Pain.有盆腔疼痛女性在娱乐性大麻合法化前后的使用情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan 1;137(1):91-99. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004207.
7
Are "traditional" sex differences less conspicuous in young cannabis users than in other young people?“传统”的性别差异在年轻大麻使用者中是否比在其他年轻人中不那么明显?
J Psychoactive Drugs. 1994 Jul-Sep;26(3):257-63. doi: 10.1080/02791072.1994.10472439.
8
Perceived support for medical cannabis use among approved medical cannabis users in Canada.加拿大已批准的医用大麻使用者对医用大麻使用的感知支持度。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jul;37(5):627-636. doi: 10.1111/dar.12823. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
Stroke in young cannabis users (18-49 years): National trends in hospitalizations and outcomes.18至49岁年轻大麻使用者的中风:住院治疗情况及预后的全国趋势
Int J Stroke. 2020 Jul;15(5):535-539. doi: 10.1177/1747493019895651. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
10
Secondhand Harms From Cannabis Use: Findings From Washington State, United States.二手大麻使用的危害:来自美国华盛顿州的发现。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Nov;85(6):777-787. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00342. Epub 2024 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting and understanding potential stigma among medical cannabis users in Germany.在德国检测并了解医用大麻使用者中潜在的污名化现象。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):874. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22084-w.
2
A qualitative review of cannabis stigmas at the twilight of prohibition.对大麻污名在禁令末期的定性综述。
J Cannabis Res. 2020 Dec 7;2(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s42238-020-00056-8.