• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸科医学中的团队沟通与问题解决

Team talk and problem solving in thoracic medicine.

作者信息

Måseide Per

机构信息

Nord University.

出版信息

Commun Med. 2016;13(1):9-22. doi: 10.1558/cam.18430.

DOI:10.1558/cam.18430
PMID:29958348
Abstract

The topic of this article is collaborative problem solving conducted as talk and social interaction in a particular team in the thoracic ward of a Norwegian hospital. The problems to be solved were complex and required a team consisting of participants from diverse medical specialties that met regularly to discuss examination procedures, formulate diagnoses, and decide forms of treatment. Data for the article come from field notes and audio recordings made while the author observed this meeting regularly over more than one year. The aim of the paper is to investigate how team discourse was regulated in ways that served the reproduction of institutional medical standards for problem solving, and also how the meeting had to deal with deviations from institutional standards and attempted to reproduce a certain form of normative orderliness and interaction order.

摘要

本文的主题是在挪威一家医院胸外科病房的一个特定团队中,作为谈话和社会互动进行的协作式问题解决。要解决的问题很复杂,需要一个由来自不同医学专业的参与者组成的团队,他们定期会面讨论检查程序、制定诊断方案并决定治疗形式。本文的数据来自作者在一年多时间里定期观察该会议时所做的实地记录和录音。本文的目的是研究团队话语是如何以有助于再现机构医疗问题解决标准的方式进行规范的,以及会议如何处理与机构标准的偏差,并试图再现某种形式的规范有序性和互动秩序。

相似文献

1
Team talk and problem solving in thoracic medicine.胸科医学中的团队沟通与问题解决
Commun Med. 2016;13(1):9-22. doi: 10.1558/cam.18430.
2
The deep play of medicine: discursive and collaborative processing of evidence in medical problem solving.医学的深度运作:医学问题解决中证据的话语及协作处理
Commun Med. 2006;3(1):43-54. doi: 10.1515/CAM.2006.005.
3
'Whereof one cannot speak thereof one must be silent': medical discourse and medical practice.
Commun Med. 2011;8(2):181-91. doi: 10.1558/cam.v8i2.181.
4
Team talk and team activity in simulated medical emergencies: a discourse analytical approach.模拟医疗紧急情况中的团队讨论与团队活动:一种话语分析方法。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Nov 14;24(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0325-1.
5
Discourse types and (re)distribution of responsibility in simulated emergency team encounters.
Commun Med. 2016;13(1):51-70. doi: 10.1558/cam.32148.
6
Analysis on the linguistic features of conflict discourse in mathematical cooperation problem solving in China.中国数学合作问题解决中冲突话语的语言特征分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 20;13:945909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945909. eCollection 2022.
7
Talk and task mastery: the importance of socially shared talk during computer-based problem solving.谈话与任务掌握:基于计算机的问题解决过程中社会共享谈话的重要性。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2006 Sep-Oct;20(7-8):591-8. doi: 10.1080/02699200500266554.
8
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
9
Health center-supplier team approach to solving i.v. equipment problems.健康中心-供应商团队解决静脉输液设备问题的方法。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1993 Feb;50(2):275-9.
10
Issues in the Development of School and Interpersonal Discourse for Children Who Have Hearing Loss.听力受损儿童的学校及人际话语发展问题
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1997 Oct 1;28(4):374-383. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461.2804.374.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing collaborative clinical reasoning among multidisciplinary healthcare teams in a neurosurgery ICU: insights from video-reflexive ethnography.加强神经外科重症监护病房多学科医疗团队之间的协作临床推理:来自视频反思民族志的见解
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06782-y.
2
Collaborative clinical reasoning: a scoping review.协作式临床推理:一项范围综述
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 6;12:e17042. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17042. eCollection 2024.