• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国数学合作问题解决中冲突话语的语言特征分析

Analysis on the linguistic features of conflict discourse in mathematical cooperation problem solving in China.

作者信息

Zhao Jingbo, Song Tingting, Song Xiaoying, Bai Yuanmeng

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Data Science and Smart Education, Ministry of Education, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 20;13:945909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945909. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945909
PMID:36204754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9531027/
Abstract

Classroom teaching is a kind of social activity system. Thus, as a form of classroom learning, collaborative problem solving has a strong social attribute. It is extremely common to choose the conflict discourse in the context of cooperation. The verbal characteristics of the conflicting discourse level in cooperative mathematics problem solving directly affects the cooperative learning between students and the classroom teaching of teachers. This article focuses on the overall linguistic characteristics of conflict discourse in solving cooperative problems and the discourse style and language characteristics of the three stages of conflict discourse. The main research conclusions are as follows: (1) The classification of language features of conflict discourse includes extreme summaries, negation, discourse markers, and so on. Among them, the frequency of Indexical 2nd-person pronouns is the highest. (2) The language expressions at the "initial stage of conflict" include Explanatory statement Negative response, instruct refuse and Seditious inquiry Confrontational answer. The language shows the characteristics of using emphatic words or phrases, negative words, imperative sentences and so on. Meanwhile, rebuttal questions, direct responses, explanations, and negative avoidance are the main forms language expressions at the "conflict stage." It also exhibits the verbal characteristics of rhetorical questions, negative comments, and direct negation. Lastly, topic-shifting, compromise, third-party intervention, and one-sided wins are the linguistic expressions at the "end of conflict." The language features are the appearance of tone relaxation and language easing, and the conflict ending utterances reflect cooperation.

摘要

课堂教学是一种社会活动系统。因此,作为课堂学习的一种形式,协作式解决问题具有很强的社会属性。在合作情境中选择冲突性话语极为常见。合作性数学问题解决中冲突性话语层面的言语特征直接影响学生之间的合作学习以及教师的课堂教学。本文聚焦于解决合作性问题时冲突性话语的整体语言特征以及冲突性话语三个阶段的话语风格和语言特点。主要研究结论如下:(1)冲突性话语的语言特征分类包括极端概括、否定、话语标记等。其中,指示性第二人称代词的出现频率最高。(2)“冲突初始阶段”的语言表达包括解释性陈述、否定回应、指令拒绝以及煽动性询问、对抗性回答。语言呈现出使用强调性词语或短语、否定词、祈使句等特征。同时,反驳性问题、直接回应、解释以及消极回避是“冲突阶段”语言表达的主要形式。它还展现出反问句、负面评价和直接否定的言语特征。最后,话题转移、妥协、第三方介入和单方面获胜是“冲突结束阶段”的语言表达。语言特征表现为语气缓和、语言放松,且冲突结束话语体现出合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2a/9531027/f3fb609edb55/fpsyg-13-945909-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2a/9531027/f3fb609edb55/fpsyg-13-945909-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2a/9531027/f3fb609edb55/fpsyg-13-945909-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis on the linguistic features of conflict discourse in mathematical cooperation problem solving in China.中国数学合作问题解决中冲突话语的语言特征分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 20;13:945909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945909. eCollection 2022.
2
Issues in the Development of School and Interpersonal Discourse for Children Who Have Hearing Loss.听力受损儿童的学校及人际话语发展问题
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1997 Oct 1;28(4):374-383. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461.2804.374.
3
Discourse bootstrapping: preschoolers use linguistic discourse to learn new words.话语引导:学龄前儿童利用语言话语来学习新单词。
Dev Sci. 2016 Jan;19(1):63-75. doi: 10.1111/desc.12289. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
4
Conflict management strategies in coping with students' disruptive behaviors in the classroom: Systematized review.应对课堂上学生破坏性行为的冲突管理策略:系统综述
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018 Jul;6(3):102-114.
5
Discourse analysis: a new methodology for understanding the ideologies of health and illness.话语分析:一种理解健康与疾病意识形态的新方法。
Aust J Public Health. 1992 Jun;16(2):145-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1992.tb00043.x.
6
Visual analysis of commognitive conflict in collaborative problem solving in classrooms.课堂协作问题解决中认知冲突的视觉分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 20;14:1216652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216652. eCollection 2023.
7
The real value of words: how target language linguistic modelling of foreign language teaching content shapes students' professional identity.词汇的真正价值:外语教学内容的目标语言语言建模如何塑造学生的职业身份。
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 30;7(3):e06581. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06581. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
The construction of power in family medicine bedside teaching: a video observation study.家庭医学床边教学中的权力构建:一项视频观察研究。
Med Educ. 2013 Feb;47(2):154-65. doi: 10.1111/medu.12055.
9
Constructing Complexity in a Young Sign Language.在一种新兴手语中构建复杂性
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 13;9:2202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02202. eCollection 2018.
10
Rhetorical strategies in Chinese and English talk show humor: a comparative analysis.中文和英文脱口秀幽默中的修辞策略:对比分析
Front Psychol. 2024 May 9;15:1380702. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1380702. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual analysis of commognitive conflict in collaborative problem solving in classrooms.课堂协作问题解决中认知冲突的视觉分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 20;14:1216652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216652. eCollection 2023.