• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

报告的牙医经皮损伤的流行率:一项荟萃分析。

Prevalence of reported percutaneous injuries on dentists: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Municipal Health Office of Florianópolis, Brazil.

Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.

出版信息

J Dent. 2018 Sep;76:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.019
PMID:29959061
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To answer the focused question, "What are the prevalence of percutaneous injuries (PIs) on dentists, the location with the highest prevalence, and the dental instrument most responsible for these injuries?" As secondary outcomes, the prevalence by geographic location, type of PI, sex distribution, and dentist's specialty were also considered.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Observational descriptive studies investigating the prevalence of percutaneous injuries on dentists were included.

SOURCES

Five electronic databases and three partial grey literature searches were performed.

RISK OF BIAS

The MAStARI tool assessed the potential risk of bias (RoB) among the studies, while the GRADE approach determined the level of evidence.

INCLUDED STUDIES

Among 2284 identified studies, 55 were included. Three studies were classified as low RoB, 17 as moderate RoB, and 35 as high RoB. The sample size ranged from 9 to 4107 dentists.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

The PI prevalence in dentists ranged from 7.72% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-37.59) to 66.74% (95%CI: 29.83-94.51). North America was the most affected region, while South America was the least affected. Differences between sexes were not significant. The dental bur was the most commonly reported dental instrument causing PIs.

LIMITATIONS

Owing to the very low GRADE level of evidence, caution should be applied when considering these findings and further research is required.

CONCLUSIONS

A high PI prevalence among dentists was noticed, and most were caused by dental burs. These findings imply that PIs should be considered by every dentist and proper measures instituted to reduce their prevalence.

摘要

目的

回答聚焦问题,“牙医发生经皮损伤(PIs)的流行率是多少,发病率最高的部位,以及导致这些损伤的最主要的牙科器械是什么?”作为次要结果,还考虑了地理位置、PI 类型、性别分布和牙医专业的流行率。

纳入标准

纳入了调查牙医经皮损伤流行率的观察性描述性研究。

资料来源

进行了五项电子数据库和三项部分灰色文献检索。

偏倚风险

MAStARI 工具评估了研究中潜在的偏倚风险(RoB),而 GRADE 方法则确定了证据水平。

纳入的研究

在 2284 项确定的研究中,有 55 项被纳入。三项研究被归类为低 RoB,17 项为中度 RoB,35 项为高 RoB。样本量从 9 名牙医到 4107 名牙医不等。

结果综合

牙医经皮损伤的流行率范围为 7.72%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.93-37.59)至 66.74%(95%CI:29.83-94.51)。北美是受影响最严重的地区,而南美洲则受影响最小。性别之间的差异无统计学意义。牙科钻头是最常报告导致 PIs 的牙科器械。

局限性

由于 GRADE 证据水平非常低,在考虑这些发现时应谨慎,并需要进一步研究。

结论

牙医经皮损伤的流行率较高,且大多数由牙科钻头引起。这些发现表明,每个牙医都应考虑 PIs,并采取适当措施降低其流行率。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of reported percutaneous injuries on dentists: A meta-analysis.报告的牙医经皮损伤的流行率:一项荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2018 Sep;76:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
2
Prevalence of percutaneous exposure incidents amongst dentists in Queensland.昆士兰州牙医经皮暴露事件的发生率。
Aust Dent J. 2006 Jun;51(2):158-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00420.x.
3
The epidemiology of needlestick and sharp instrument accidents in a Nigerian hospital.尼日利亚一家医院针刺伤和锐器伤事故的流行病学情况。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;15(1):27-31. doi: 10.1086/646814.
4
The prevalence of occupational health-related problems in dentistry: A review of the literature.牙科相关职业健康问题的流行情况:文献回顾。
J Occup Health. 2018 Mar 27;60(2):111-125. doi: 10.1539/joh.17-0188-RA. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
5
Prevalence of adenoid hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腺样体肥大的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sleep Med Rev. 2018 Apr;38:101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Injury and infection in dental clinics: Risk factors and prevention.牙科诊所中的损伤与感染:风险因素及预防
Toxicol Ind Health. 2018 Sep;34(9):609-619. doi: 10.1177/0748233718769553. Epub 2018 May 22.
7
Self-reported occupational health problems among Libyan dentists.利比亚牙医自我报告的职业健康问题。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Jan 1;16(1):31-5. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1631.
8
Prevalence of radiographic findings on jaws exposed to antiresorptive therapy: a meta-analysis.抗吸收治疗后颌骨的放射影像学表现的流行率:一项荟萃分析。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Mar;48(3):20180112. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180112. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
9
Association between obstructive sleep apnea and alcohol, caffeine and tobacco: A meta-analysis.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与酒精、咖啡因和烟草之间的关联:一项荟萃分析。
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Nov;45(11):890-902. doi: 10.1111/joor.12686. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
10
UK dentists' experience of iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injuries in relation to routine dental procedures: why, when and how often?英国牙医在常规牙科手术中发生医源性三叉神经损伤的经历:原因、时间和频率如何?
Br Dent J. 2013 Jun;214(12):633-42. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.583.

引用本文的文献

1
Needlestick and Sharp Injury Among Dental Instrument Reprocessing Personnel: Incidence and Reporting Practices in China.牙科器械再处理人员的针刺伤和锐器伤:中国的发生率及报告情况
Int Dent J. 2025 Aug 5;75(5):100944. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100944.
2
Prevalence of needlestick injuries in dental assistants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.牙科助手针刺伤的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Glob Health. 2025 Feb 14;15:04030. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04030.
3
Bloodborne Infections Relevant to Dental Practice.与口腔诊疗相关的血源感染
Int Dent J. 2024 Nov;74 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S429-S436. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.09.010.
4
A descriptive study of percutaneous injuries in National Healthcare Group POLYCLINICS dental clinics in Singapore from 2014 to 2020.2014年至2020年新加坡国立健保集团综合诊疗所牙科诊所经皮损伤的描述性研究。
BDJ Open. 2023 Oct 16;9(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41405-023-00171-7.
5
Prevalence and characteristics of needlestick injuries among dental interns during their first-year clinical training: an observational study.口腔实习医师在第一年临床培训中发生针刺伤的流行率和特征:一项观察性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 2;23(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02892-5.
6
Needlestick and sharps' injury in healthcare students: Prevalence, knowledge, attitude and practice.医护专业学生的针刺伤和锐器伤:发生率、知识、态度与实践
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Oct;11(10):6327-6333. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_155_22. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
7
A 19-Year Study of Dental Needlestick and Sharps Injuries in Japan.日本一项长达 19 年的牙科用针和锐器伤害研究。
Int Dent J. 2023 Feb;73(1):114-120. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
8
Occupational Infections among Dental Health Workers in Germany-14-Year Time Trends.德国牙科医护人员职业感染-14 年时间趋势。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 27;18(19):10128. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910128.
9
Identifying Trends of Percutaneous Injuries at an Australian Dental School.鉴定澳大利亚牙科学院的经皮损伤趋势。
Int Dent J. 2022 Jun;72(3):308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
10
A study on PEI among private dentists in Mashhad, Iran.伊朗马什哈德私立牙医中聚乙烯亚胺的一项研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1403-1406. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_900_19. eCollection 2020 Mar.