• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追踪认知控制的试验内、试验间和发展动态:来自 Simon 任务的证据。

Tracking the Within-Trial, Cross-Trial, and Developmental Dynamics of Cognitive Control: Evidence From the Simon Task.

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2019 Nov;90(6):e831-e848. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13111. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.13111
PMID:29959776
Abstract

Six- to 8-year-olds, 10- to 12-year-olds, and adults (N = 108) performed the Simon task by reaching to targets on a digital display. The spatial and temporal characteristics of their movements were used to assess how two key processes underlying cognitive control-a threshold adjustment process and a controlled selection process-unfold over the course of a response (within-trial dynamics), are modulated by recent experience (cross-trial dynamics), and contribute to age-related gains in control (developmental dynamics). The results indicate that the controlled selection process undergoes a more protracted development than the threshold adjustment process. The results also shed light on a prominent debate concerning the cross-trial dynamics of control by supporting the feature integration account over the conflict adaptation account.

摘要

6 至 8 岁、10 至 12 岁和成年人(N=108)通过在数字显示屏上伸手触及目标来完成西蒙任务。他们的运动的空间和时间特征用于评估认知控制的两个关键过程——阈值调整过程和受控选择过程——如何在响应过程中展开(在试内动态),以及如何受到近期经验的调节(在试间动态),并有助于控制的年龄相关收益(发展动态)。结果表明,受控选择过程的发展比阈值调整过程更为漫长。结果还通过支持特征整合理论而非冲突适应理论,为控制的在试间动态方面的一个重要争论提供了线索。

相似文献

1
Tracking the Within-Trial, Cross-Trial, and Developmental Dynamics of Cognitive Control: Evidence From the Simon Task.追踪认知控制的试验内、试验间和发展动态:来自 Simon 任务的证据。
Child Dev. 2019 Nov;90(6):e831-e848. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13111. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
2
Cognitive control in action: Tracking the dynamics of rule switching in 5- to 8-year-olds and adults.行动中的认知控制:追踪5至8岁儿童和成年人规则转换的动态过程。
Cognition. 2017 Jul;164:163-173. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.023. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
3
Practice-induced and sequential modulations in the Simon task: evidence from pupil dilation.西蒙任务中练习诱发的和序列性的调节:来自瞳孔扩张的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Dec;110:187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
4
Conflict and error adaptation in the Simon task.西蒙任务中的冲突与错误适应
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Feb;136(2):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
5
Metacognitive Monitoring of Executive Control Engagement During Childhood.儿童期执行控制参与的元认知监测
Child Dev. 2016 Jul;87(4):1264-76. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12537. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
6
Contextual within-trial adaptation of cognitive control: Evidence from the combination of conflict tasks.认知控制的试验内情境适应:来自冲突任务组合的证据
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Oct;42(10):1505-32. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000229. Epub 2016 May 5.
7
Reach tracking reveals dissociable processes underlying inhibitory control in 5- to 10-year-olds and adults.追踪研究揭示了 5 至 10 岁儿童和成人抑制控制的不同潜在过程。
Dev Sci. 2018 Mar;21(2). doi: 10.1111/desc.12523. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
Eye movements reveal dynamics of task control.眼动揭示任务控制的动态。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):489-509. doi: 10.1037/a0029353. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
9
Inventing a new measurement for inhibitory control in preschoolers.发明一种针对学龄前儿童抑制控制能力的新测量方法。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Mar;37(1):1-13. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12242. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
10
Taking a Third-Person Perspective Requires Inhibitory Control: Evidence From a Developmental Negative Priming Study.采用第三人称视角需要抑制控制:来自一项发展性负启动研究的证据。
Child Dev. 2016 Nov;87(6):1825-1840. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12558. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving beyond button presses to enhance the reliability of congruency tasks.超越按键操作以提高一致性任务的可靠性。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 2;57(8):215. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02740-0.
2
Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context.注意调整在启动任务中:控制策略取决于语境。
Cogn Process. 2023 Feb;24(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01117-x. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
3
Effects of conflict in cognitive control: Evidence from mouse tracking.认知控制中的冲突效应:来自鼠标追踪的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jan;76(1):54-69. doi: 10.1177/17470218221078265. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
4
Tracking continuities in the flanker task: From continuous flow to movement trajectories.追踪 Flanker 任务中的连续性:从连续流到运动轨迹。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Feb;83(2):731-747. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02154-4. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Different temporal dynamics after conflicts and errors in children and adults.儿童和成人在冲突和错误后表现出不同的时间动态。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 31;15(8):e0238221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238221. eCollection 2020.
6
Associative priming and conflict differentially affect two processes underlying cognitive control: Evidence from reaching behavior.联想启动和冲突对认知控制的两个基础过程有不同影响:来自伸手行为的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Aug;26(4):1400-1410. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01576-y.
7
Layers of latent effects in cognitive control: An EEG investigation.认知控制中潜在效应的层次:一项脑电图研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Apr;195:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 1.