Center for Transformative Research on Health Behavior, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, United States; Graduate Program of Translational Biology, Medicine & Health, Virginia Tech, United States.
Center for Transformative Research on Health Behavior, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, United States.
Appetite. 2018 Oct 1;129:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.032. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity.
负向收入冲击,即财务稳定性的迅速降低,先前已被证明会增加对金钱的冲动选择和对快餐的需求。这些导致肥胖的因素相互作用被称为强化物病理。本研究使用跨商品延迟折扣任务以及对快餐和替代商品的购买,考察了负向收入冲击对金钱和快餐折扣的影响。从亚马逊土耳其机器人招募了一个肥胖样本(n=120),并将其分为两组:负向收入冲击组(n=60)和对照组(n=60)。然后,参与者完成了金钱和食物的跨商品折扣任务以及对快餐和瓶装水的购买任务。负向收入冲击组在折扣任务中表现出更大的冲动选择,以及对快餐的更高需求强度,但对非热量控制商品(瓶装水)没有这种需求。这些结果表明,负向收入冲击增加了对即时强化的偏好,而不论商品类型(金钱或快餐)如何,但对特定商品(快餐而不是替代商品)的需求有特定的影响。在强化物病理框架中,负向收入冲击增加了对未来的折扣,同时特别增加了对快餐的需求,这代表肥胖人群中负面健康行为的高风险状态。