Texas A&M University, United States.
University of Oklahoma, United States.
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Aug;79:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
Single Case Experimental Design is a discipline grounded in applied behavior analysis where the needs of individual clients and the application of scientific inquiry are fundamental tenets. These two principles remain tantamount in the conduct of research using this methodology and the expansion of the method into evidence-based practice determinations. Although recommendations for quality indicators are widespread, implementation is not. Concurrent to the rise of quality indicators is an increasing interest in analysis methodology. Visual analysis has a history of application and validity, newer forms of analysis less so. While some argue for concordance between the two, it may be the differences that are worth exploration in understanding characteristics of trend and variability in much of the published literature. Design choice and visual analysis decisions are rarely fully articulated. Statistical analyses are likewise inadequately justified or described. Recommendations for the explicit language of reporting as derived from prior meta-analysis and a current review of two leading journals provides a scaffold consistent with existing guidelines but additive in detail, exemplars, and justification. This is intended to improve reporting of results for individual studies and their potential use in future meta-analytic work.
单病例实验设计是一门扎根于应用行为分析的学科,其中个体客户的需求和科学探究的应用是基本原则。这两个原则在使用这种方法进行研究和将该方法扩展到基于证据的实践决策时仍然至关重要。尽管质量指标的建议很广泛,但实施情况并非如此。与质量指标的兴起同时出现的是对分析方法的日益关注。视觉分析具有应用和有效性的历史,而较新的分析形式则不然。虽然有人认为两者应该一致,但在理解发表文献中趋势和可变性的特征方面,差异可能更值得探索。设计选择和视觉分析决策很少得到充分说明。统计分析同样也没有得到充分的证明或描述。从先前的荟萃分析和对两个主要期刊的当前审查中得出的报告明确语言的建议提供了一个与现有指南一致但在细节、范例和证明方面更具附加性的框架。这旨在改善个体研究结果的报告,并提高其在未来荟萃分析工作中的潜在用途。