University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
Vanderbilt University, United States.
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Aug;79:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 26.
An increasing movement in single case research is to employ statistical analyses as one form of data analysis. Researchers have proposed different statistical approaches. The purpose of this paper is to examine the utility and discriminant validity of two novel types of between-case standardized effect size analyses with two existing systematic reviews. The between-case analyses found greater effect sizes for the studies in the object play review and smaller effect sizes for studies of sensory intervention, which were consistent with the overall conclusions reached in the original systematic reviews. These findings provide evidence of discriminant validity, although concerns remain around the methods' utility across different single case research designs. Future directions for research and development also are provided.
越来越多的个案研究采用统计分析作为数据分析的一种形式。研究人员提出了不同的统计方法。本文旨在通过两项已有系统综述,检验两种新的个案间标准化效应量分析的效用和判别效度。个案间分析发现,客体游戏综述中的研究具有更大的效应量,而感觉干预研究的效应量则较小,这与原始系统综述得出的总体结论一致。这些发现提供了判别效度的证据,尽管人们仍然对这些方法在不同的个案研究设计中的效用存在担忧。还提供了未来研究和发展的方向。