• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新一代药物洗脱支架置入后血管造影残余狭窄对临床结局的影响:RESET 和 NEXT 试验的 pooled 分析结果。

Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 30;7(13):e008718. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008718.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.008718
PMID:29960987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6064905/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous intravascular ultrasound studies suggested the association of stent underexpansion with increased risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis. However, no previous study has addressed the association of the suboptimal angiographic result with target-lesion revascularization (TLR) in patients receiving new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).

METHODS AND RESULTS

RESET (Randomized evaluation of sirolimus-eluting versus everolimus-eluting stent trial) and NEXT (NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent trial) are prospective, multicenter, randomized "DES versus DES" trials; 3196 patients and 3235 patients were enrolled in the RESET and NEXT, respectively. Using the pooled individual patient-level data, the current study population consisted of 3679 patients who received single-lesion treatment using new-generation DES such as everolimus-eluting stent and biolimus-eluting stent. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to the residual in-stent % diameter stenosis (%DS) after stent implantation by offline quantitative coronary angiography assessed in a core angiographic laboratory (optimal group: %DS <10%, intermediate group: %DS=10% to 20%, suboptimal group: %DS ≧20%). The cumulative 3-year incidence of TLR was significantly higher in the suboptimal group than in the intermediate and optimal groups (9.8% versus 5.8% versus 5.7%, log-rank =0.004). Even after adjusting for the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, the excess TLR risk of the suboptimal group relative to the optimal group remained significant (hazard ratio: 1.65, 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.41, =0.009). The excess TLR risk of the suboptimal group relative to the optimal group was consistently seen across all the subgroups including heavy calcification.

CONCLUSIONS

The residual angiographic in-stent %DS ≥20% was associated with increased risk for TLR in patients treated with the new-generation DES.

摘要

背景

先前的血管内超声研究表明支架扩张不足与支架血栓形成和再狭窄的风险增加有关。然而,以前没有研究探讨接受新一代药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗的患者中,造影结果不理想与靶病变血运重建(TLR)的关系。

方法和结果

RESET(西罗莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的随机评估试验)和 NEXT(NOBORI 生物可降解涂层依维莫司洗脱支架与 XIENCE/PROMUS 依维莫司洗脱支架试验)是前瞻性、多中心、随机的“DES 与 DES”试验;RESET 和 NEXT 分别纳入了 3196 例和 3235 例患者。利用汇总的个体患者水平数据,当前的研究人群包括 3679 例接受新一代 DES(如依维莫司洗脱支架和生物可降解涂层依维莫司洗脱支架)单病灶治疗的患者。根据核心血管造影实验室离线定量冠状动脉造影评估的支架内残余狭窄百分比(%DS),将研究人群分为 3 组(最佳组:%DS<10%,中间组:%DS=10%至 20%,不理想组:%DS≥20%)。不理想组的 3 年累积 TLR 发生率明显高于中间组和最佳组(9.8%比 5.8%比 5.7%,log-rank=0.004)。即使调整了临床、血管造影和手术特征,不理想组相对于最佳组的 TLR 风险仍然显著增加(风险比:1.65,95%置信区间,1.14-2.41,=0.009)。在包括重度钙化在内的所有亚组中,不理想组相对于最佳组的 TLR 风险均较高。

结论

接受新一代 DES 治疗的患者,支架内残余造影狭窄百分比≥20%与 TLR 风险增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6796/6064905/d43a914b2dda/JAH3-7-e008718-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6796/6064905/de50e61b6964/JAH3-7-e008718-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6796/6064905/d43a914b2dda/JAH3-7-e008718-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6796/6064905/de50e61b6964/JAH3-7-e008718-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6796/6064905/d43a914b2dda/JAH3-7-e008718-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Angiographic Residual Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes After New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation: Insights From a Pooled Analysis of the RESET and NEXT Trials.新一代药物洗脱支架置入后血管造影残余狭窄对临床结局的影响:RESET 和 NEXT 试验的 pooled 分析结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 30;7(13):e008718. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008718.
2
Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后病变长度和血管大小对临床结局的影响:来自 SPIRIT(依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统 XIENCE V 的临床评估)和 COMPARE(真实世界中第二代依维莫司洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱支架)随机试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.016.
3
A 10-month angiographic and 4-year clinical outcome of everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in patients with diabetes mellitus (the DiabeDES IV randomized angiography trial).糖尿病患者中依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架与西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的10个月血管造影和4年临床结果(DiabeDES IV随机血管造影试验)
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 1;86(7):1161-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25875. Epub 2015 May 6.
4
Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis: Results From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the RIBS IV and V Trials.依维莫司洗脱支架用于裸金属和药物洗脱支架内再狭窄患者:RIBS IV和V试验患者水平汇总分析结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003479.
5
A clinical and angiographic study of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: the EXECUTIVE trial (EXecutive RCT: evaluating XIENCE V in a multi vessel disease).XIENCE V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗多支冠状动脉疾病患者的临床和血管造影研究:EXECUTIVE 试验(EXecutive RCT:评估 XIENCE V 在多支血管疾病中的应用)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1012-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
6
Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).在冠状动脉疾病中,依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的荟萃分析:SPIRIT 临床试验计划的最终 3 年结果(在治疗新发病变的患者中,使用依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗的西里斯 V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):914-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.005.
7
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
8
First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries).首例人体生物可吸收聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架的评估:DESOLVE I 试验(载有依维莫司和生物可吸收聚合物的 DES 治疗原发性冠状动脉病变患者)的影像学和临床结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1026-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
9
Impact of Coronary Calcification on Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.新型药物洗脱支架植入术后冠状动脉钙化对临床结局的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun 15;10(12):e019815. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019815. Epub 2021 May 29.
10
Comparison of newer-generation drug-eluting with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of the EXAMINATION (clinical Evaluation of the Xience-V stent in Acute Myocardial INfArcTION) and COMFORTABLE-AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trials.比较新一代药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:EXAMINATION(急性心肌梗死中评价 Xience-V 支架的临床研究)和 COMFORTABLE-AMI(急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中生物可降解涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较研究)试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Angiographic Findings and Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve.血管造影表现与经皮冠状动脉介入术后的血流储备分数。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418072. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18072.
2
[Indications and techniques for endovascular revascularization of visceral arteries in mesenteric ischemia].[肠系膜缺血中内脏动脉血管内血运重建的适应症和技术]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 May;95(5):353-358. doi: 10.1007/s00104-023-02013-6. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
Prognostic Impacts of CHADS, CHADS-VASc, and CHADS-VASc-HS Scores on Clinical Outcomes After Elective Drug-Eluting Stent Placement for De Novo Coronary Stenosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusion. The central role of an optimized immediate post-procedural angiographic result.冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的再狭窄。优化术后即刻血管造影结果的核心作用。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 1;224:343-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.028. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
2
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: The IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内超声指导与血管造影指导依维莫司洗脱支架置入的效果:IVUS-XPL 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Nov 24;314(20):2155-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15454.
3
CHADS、CHADS-VASc和CHADS-VASc-HS评分对择期药物洗脱支架置入治疗初发冠状动脉狭窄后临床结局的预后影响
Circ Rep. 2023 Mar 15;5(4):123-132. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0120. eCollection 2023 Apr 10.
4
Reduced-dose prasugrel monotherapy without aspirin after PCI with the SYNERGY stent in East Asian patients presenting with chronic coronary syndromes or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: rationale and design of the ASET Japan pilot study.东亚慢性冠状动脉综合征或非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者在使用SYNERGY支架进行PCI术后,不联合阿司匹林的低剂量普拉格雷单药治疗:ASET日本试点研究的原理与设计
AsiaIntervention. 2023 Mar 15;9(1):39-48. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-22-00033. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Comparison of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting coronary stents: final 5-year report of the RESOLUTE all-comers trial.
佐他莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架与依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的比较:RESOLUTE 全人群试验的5年最终报告。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(6):e002230. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002230.
4
Meta-analysis of long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents.依维莫司洗脱支架长期临床结局的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 15;116(2):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.059. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
5
Risk of stent thrombosis among bare-metal stents, first-generation drug-eluting stents, and second-generation drug-eluting stents: results from a registry of 18,334 patients.裸金属支架、第一代药物洗脱支架和第二代药物洗脱支架的支架血栓形成风险:来自 18334 名患者的注册研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.015.
6
Comparison of outcomes using the sirolimus-eluting stent in calcified versus non-calcified native coronary lesions in patients on- versus not on-chronic hemodialysis (from the j-Cypher registry).比较慢性血液透析患者与非透析患者的钙化与非钙化原发性冠状动脉病变中应用依维莫司洗脱支架的疗效(来自 j-Cypher 注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;112(5):647-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.043. Epub 2013 May 21.
7
Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.可生物降解聚合物载比伐卢定洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架比较:一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 16;62(3):181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.045. Epub 2013 May 15.
8
Angiographic findings of everolimus-eluting as compared to sirolimus-eluting stents: angiographic sub-study from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial (RESET).与西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,依维莫司洗脱支架的血管造影结果:来自西罗莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架随机评估试验(RESET)的血管造影子研究。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013 Oct;28(4):344-51. doi: 10.1007/s12928-013-0179-7. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
9
Comparison of clinical interpretation with visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice: the Assessing Angiography (A2) project.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的临床解读与视觉评估和定量冠状动脉造影:评估造影(A2)项目。
Circulation. 2013 Apr 30;127(17):1793-800. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001952. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
10
A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial.血管内超声指导与血管造影指导复杂冠状动脉病变支架置入术的前瞻性、随机试验:AVIO 试验。
Am Heart J. 2013 Jan;165(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.09.017. Epub 2012 Nov 20.