Federal University of Minas Gerais, Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e021091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021091.
Respiratory muscle dysfunction has been associated with failure to wean from mechanical ventilation. It has therefore been hypothesised that these patients might benefit from inspiratory muscle training (IMT). Evidence, however, is thus far limited to data from small, single-centre studies with heterogeneity in inclusion criteria, training modalities and outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a novel IMT method on weaning outcomes in selected patients with weaning difficulties.
This study is designed as a double-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled superiority trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients with weaning difficulties will be randomly allocated into either an IMT group (intervention) or a sham-IMT group (control). Ninetypatients (45 in each group) will be needed to detect a 28% difference in the proportion of weaning success between groups (estimated difference in primary outcome based on previous studies) with a risk for type I error (α) of 5% and statistical power (1-β) of 80%. Patients will perform four sets of 6-10 breaths daily against an external load using a tapered flow resistive loading device (POWERbreathe KH2, HaB International, UK). Training intensity in the intervention group will be adjusted to the highest tolerable load. The control group will train against a low resistance that will not be modified during the training period. Training will becontinued until patients are successfully weaned or for a maximum duration of 28 days. Pulmonary and respiratory muscle function, weaning duration, duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days and length of stay in the intensive care unit will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. Χ2 tests and analysis of covariance with adjustments for baseline values of respective outcomesas covariates will be used to compare results after the intervention period between groups.
Ethics approval was obtained from the local ethical committee (Ethische Commissie Onderzoek UZ/KU Leuven protocol ID: S60516). Results from this randomised controlled trial will be presented at scientific meetings as abstracts for poster or oral presentations and published in peerreviewed journals.
Enrolment into the study have started in August 2017. Data collection and data analysis are expected to be completed in September 2021.
NCT03240263.
呼吸肌功能障碍与机械通气脱机失败有关。因此,有人假设这些患者可能受益于吸气肌训练(IMT)。然而,迄今为止,证据仅限于来自小型单中心研究的数据,这些研究在纳入标准、训练方式和结果方面存在异质性。本研究旨在评估一种新的 IMT 方法对有脱机困难的选定患者脱机结局的影响。
本研究设计为双盲、平行组、随机对照优效性试验,分配比例为 1:1。将有脱机困难的患者随机分配到 IMT 组(干预组)或假 IMT 组(对照组)。需要 90 名患者(每组 45 名)来检测两组间脱机成功率的 28%差异(基于先前研究估计的主要结局差异),I 型错误风险(α)为 5%,统计效力(1-β)为 80%。患者将使用锥形流量阻力加载装置(POWERbreathe KH2,HaB International,英国)每天进行 4 组 6-10 次呼吸,对抗外部负荷。干预组的训练强度将调整至最高耐受负荷。对照组将在训练期间不进行调整的低阻力下进行训练。训练将持续到患者成功脱机或最长 28 天。将评估肺和呼吸肌功能、脱机时间、机械通气时间、无呼吸机天数和重症监护病房住院时间作为次要结局。将使用 Χ2 检验和协方差分析,将各自结局的基线值作为协变量进行调整,以比较干预后两组间的结果。
已从当地伦理委员会(UZ/KU Leuven 伦理委员会协议 ID:S60516)获得伦理批准。将以海报或口头报告摘要的形式在科学会议上介绍本随机对照试验的结果,并发表在同行评议期刊上。
该研究的入组于 2017 年 8 月开始。预计数据收集和数据分析将于 2021 年 9 月完成。
NCT03240263。