a Faculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education, Graduate School of Exercise Science , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada.
b Ontario Institute of Secondary Education, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2019 Mar;19(2):141-146. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1491628. Epub 2018 Jul 1.
The aim of this study was to examine the impact of contextual factors on relative locomotor and metabolic power distances during professional female soccer matches. Twenty-eight players (forwards, n = 4; midfielders, n = 12; defenders, n = 12) that competed in a 90-min home and away match (regular season only). The generalised estimating equations (GEE) was used to evaluate relative locomotor and metabolic power distances for three contextual factors: location (home vs. away), type of turf (natural vs. artificial), and match outcome (win, loss and draw). No differences were observed for home vs. away matches. Moderate-intensity running (20.0 ± 1.0 m min and 16.4 ± 0.9 m min), high-intensity running (8.6 ± 0.4 m min and 7.3 ± 0.4 m min) and high-metabolic power (16.3 ± 0.5 m min and 14.4 ± 0.5 m min) distances were elevated on artificial turf compared to natural grass, respectively. Relative sprint distance was greater during losses compared with draws (4.3 ± 0.4 m min and 3.4 ± 0.3 m min). Overall physical demands of professional women's soccer were not impacted by match location. However, the elevation of moderate and high-intensity demands while playing on artificial turf may have implications on match preparations as well as recovery strategies.
本研究旨在探讨在职业女子足球比赛中,情境因素对相对跑动和代谢功率距离的影响。28 名运动员(前锋,n=4;中场球员,n=12;后卫,n=12)参加了 90 分钟的主场和客场比赛(仅常规赛)。使用广义估计方程(GEE)评估了三个情境因素的相对跑动和代谢功率距离:位置(主场对客场)、草皮类型(天然草皮对人工草皮)和比赛结果(胜、负和平局)。主场和客场比赛之间没有差异。中高强度跑动(20.0±1.0 m min 和 16.4±0.9 m min)、高强度跑动(8.6±0.4 m min 和 7.3±0.4 m min)和高代谢功率(16.3±0.5 m min 和 14.4±0.5 m min)距离在人工草皮上分别高于天然草皮。与平局相比,输球时的相对冲刺距离更大(4.3±0.4 m min 和 3.4±0.3 m min)。职业女子足球比赛的整体身体需求不受比赛地点的影响。然而,在人工草皮上比赛时中高强度需求的增加可能对比赛准备和恢复策略有影响。