Suppr超能文献

不同义齿基托材料与软性义齿衬垫之间的拉伸粘结强度

Tensile Bond Strength between Different Denture Base Materials and Soft Denture Liners.

作者信息

Vuksic Josip, Pilipovic Ana, Poklepovic Pericic Tina, Kranjcic Josip

机构信息

Department of Removable Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gunduliceva 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Dubrava, Av. Gojka Šuška 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;16(13):4615. doi: 10.3390/ma16134615.

Abstract

(1) Background: Various materials are available for CAD-CAM denture base fabrication, for both additive and subtractive manufacturing. However, little has been reported on bond strength to soft denture liners. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate tensile bond strength, comparing between different denture base materials and soft denture liners. (2) Methods: Seven different materials were used for denture base fabrication: one heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate, three materials for subtractive manufacturing, two materials for additive manufacturing and one polyamide. Two materials were used for soft denture lining: one silicone-based and one acrylate-based. The study was conducted according to the specification ISO No. 10139-2:2016, and the type of failure was determined. The Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post hoc test was used to analyse the values of tensile bond strength, and Fisher's exact test was used to analyse the type of failure. Values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. (3) Results: The tensile bond strength values were not statistically significantly different combining all the materials used for denture base fabrication with the acrylate-based soft denture liner ( > 0.05), and the average values ranged between 0.19 and 0.25 Mpa. The tensile bond strength values of the different denture base materials and silicone-based denture liner were statistically significantly different ( < 0.05), and the average values ranged between 1.49 and 3.07 Mpa. The type of failure was predominantly adhesive between polyamide and both additive-manufactured denture base materials in combination with the acrylate-based soft liner ( < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: The use of digital technologies in denture base fabrication can have an influence on different tensile bond strength values for soft denture liners, with different types of failure when compared with heat-cured PMMA. Similar tensile bond strength values were found between the acrylate-based soft denture liner and denture base materials. Significant differences in tensile bond strength values were found between the silicone-based soft denture liner and denture base materials, where the additive-manufactured and polyamide denture base materials showed lower values than heat-cured PMMA and subtractive-manufactured denture base materials.

摘要

(1) 背景:有多种材料可用于CAD-CAM义齿基托制作,包括增材制造和减材制造。然而,关于与软质义齿衬垫的粘结强度的报道较少。因此,本研究的目的是比较不同义齿基托材料和软质义齿衬垫之间的拉伸粘结强度。(2) 方法:使用七种不同材料制作义齿基托:一种热聚合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯、三种用于减材制造的材料、两种用于增材制造的材料和一种聚酰胺。使用两种材料制作软质义齿衬里:一种硅酮基材料和一种丙烯酸酯基材料。本研究按照ISO No. 10139-2:2016规范进行,并确定失效类型。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn事后检验分析拉伸粘结强度值,采用Fisher精确检验分析失效类型。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。(3) 结果:将所有用于义齿基托制作的材料与丙烯酸酯基软质义齿衬垫结合时,拉伸粘结强度值无统计学显著差异(P>0.05),平均值在0.19至0.25MPa之间。不同义齿基托材料与硅酮基义齿衬垫的拉伸粘结强度值有统计学显著差异(P<0.05),平均值在1.49至3.07MPa之间。聚酰胺与两种增材制造的义齿基托材料与丙烯酸酯基软质衬垫结合时,失效类型主要为粘结性(P<0.05)。(4) 结论:义齿基托制作中使用数字技术会对软质义齿衬垫的不同拉伸粘结强度值产生影响,与热固化PMMA相比,失效类型也不同。丙烯酸酯基软质义齿衬垫与义齿基托材料之间的拉伸粘结强度值相似。硅酮基软质义齿衬垫与义齿基托材料之间的拉伸粘结强度值存在显著差异,其中增材制造和聚酰胺义齿基托材料的值低于热固化PMMA和减材制造的义齿基托材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/badf/10343004/11e41e3d2e45/materials-16-04615-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验