Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Kyunghee University, Seoul 05278, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):777-782. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.777. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
To evaluate the inter-vendor and inter-session reliability of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and relevant parameters.
This prospective study included 10 healthy subjects (5 women and 5 men; age range, 25-33 years). Each subject was scanned twice using 3T magnetic resonance scanners from three different vendors at two different sites. A voxel-wise statistical analysis of diffusion data was performed using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and radial diffusivity (RD) values were calculated for each brain voxel using FMRIB's Diffusion Toolbox.
A repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that there were no significant differences in FA values across the vendors or between sessions; however, there were significant differences in MD values between the vendors ( = 0.020). Although there were no significant differences in inter-session MD and inter-session/inter-vendor RD values, a significant group × factor interaction revealed differences in MD and RD values between the 1st and 2nd sessions conducted by the vendors ( = 0.004 and 0.006, respectively).
Although FA values exhibited good inter-vendor and inter-session reliability, MD and RD values did not show consistent results. Researchers using DTI should be aware of these limitations, especially when implementing DTI in multicenter studies.
评估扩散张量成像(DTI)及其相关参数的供应商间和会话间可靠性。
本前瞻性研究纳入了 10 名健康受试者(5 名女性,5 名男性;年龄范围 25-33 岁)。每位受试者在两个不同地点的 3 台不同供应商的 3T 磁共振扫描仪上进行了两次扫描。使用基于束的空间统计学对扩散数据进行了体素统计分析。使用 FMRIB 的扩散工具箱计算了每个脑体素的分数各向异性(FA)、平均扩散系数(MD)和径向扩散系数(RD)值。
重复测量方差分析显示,FA 值在供应商之间或会话之间没有显著差异;然而,MD 值在供应商之间存在显著差异( = 0.020)。尽管 MD 值和 MD 值的会话间差异以及供应商间/会话间 RD 值没有显著差异,但组×因素相互作用显示出 MD 和 RD 值在供应商进行的第 1 次和第 2 次会话之间存在差异(分别为 = 0.004 和 0.006)。
尽管 FA 值表现出良好的供应商间和会话间可靠性,但 MD 和 RD 值并未显示出一致的结果。使用 DTI 的研究人员应该意识到这些限制,特别是在进行多中心研究时。