• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨供应商和跨会话弥散张量成像的可靠性:对多中心临床成像研究的影响。

Inter-Vendor and Inter-Session Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Implications for Multicenter Clinical Imaging Studies.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Korea.

Department of Radiology, Kyunghee University, Seoul 05278, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):777-782. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.777. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

DOI:10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.777
PMID:29962884
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6005957/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the inter-vendor and inter-session reliability of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and relevant parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 10 healthy subjects (5 women and 5 men; age range, 25-33 years). Each subject was scanned twice using 3T magnetic resonance scanners from three different vendors at two different sites. A voxel-wise statistical analysis of diffusion data was performed using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and radial diffusivity (RD) values were calculated for each brain voxel using FMRIB's Diffusion Toolbox.

RESULTS

A repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that there were no significant differences in FA values across the vendors or between sessions; however, there were significant differences in MD values between the vendors ( = 0.020). Although there were no significant differences in inter-session MD and inter-session/inter-vendor RD values, a significant group × factor interaction revealed differences in MD and RD values between the 1st and 2nd sessions conducted by the vendors ( = 0.004 and 0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although FA values exhibited good inter-vendor and inter-session reliability, MD and RD values did not show consistent results. Researchers using DTI should be aware of these limitations, especially when implementing DTI in multicenter studies.

摘要

目的

评估扩散张量成像(DTI)及其相关参数的供应商间和会话间可靠性。

材料和方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了 10 名健康受试者(5 名女性,5 名男性;年龄范围 25-33 岁)。每位受试者在两个不同地点的 3 台不同供应商的 3T 磁共振扫描仪上进行了两次扫描。使用基于束的空间统计学对扩散数据进行了体素统计分析。使用 FMRIB 的扩散工具箱计算了每个脑体素的分数各向异性(FA)、平均扩散系数(MD)和径向扩散系数(RD)值。

结果

重复测量方差分析显示,FA 值在供应商之间或会话之间没有显著差异;然而,MD 值在供应商之间存在显著差异( = 0.020)。尽管 MD 值和 MD 值的会话间差异以及供应商间/会话间 RD 值没有显著差异,但组×因素相互作用显示出 MD 和 RD 值在供应商进行的第 1 次和第 2 次会话之间存在差异(分别为 = 0.004 和 0.006)。

结论

尽管 FA 值表现出良好的供应商间和会话间可靠性,但 MD 和 RD 值并未显示出一致的结果。使用 DTI 的研究人员应该意识到这些限制,特别是在进行多中心研究时。

相似文献

1
Inter-Vendor and Inter-Session Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Implications for Multicenter Clinical Imaging Studies.跨供应商和跨会话弥散张量成像的可靠性:对多中心临床成像研究的影响。
Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):777-782. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.777. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
2
Multisite longitudinal reliability of tract-based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging of healthy elderly subjects.基于体素的各向异性扩散张量成像中健康老年人的多点纵向可靠性研究。
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:390-403. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.075. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
3
Differences in Gaussian diffusion tensor imaging and non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging model-based estimates of diffusion tensor invariants in the human brain.基于高斯扩散张量成像和非高斯扩散峰度成像模型的人脑扩散张量不变量估计差异。
Med Phys. 2016 May;43(5):2464. doi: 10.1118/1.4946819.
4
Scan-rescan repeatability and cross-scanner comparability of DTI metrics in healthy subjects in the SPRINT-MS multicenter trial.SPRINT-MS多中心试验中健康受试者DTI指标的扫描-重扫重复性及跨扫描仪可比性
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Nov;53:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
Diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of cancellous bone quality in femoral neck of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects at 3T: Preliminary experience.3T 下健康、骨质疏松和骨质疏松症受试者股骨颈松质骨质量的弥散张量成像和磁共振波谱评估:初步经验。
Bone. 2013 Jul;55(1):7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
6
Adverse effects of metallic artifacts on voxel-wise analysis and tract-based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging.金属伪影对扩散张量成像中基于体素的分析和基于纤维束的空间统计的不良影响。
Acta Radiol. 2017 Feb;58(2):211-217. doi: 10.1177/0284185116641348. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
Inter-vendor and inter-observer reliability of diffusion tensor imaging in the musculoskeletal system: a multiscanner MR study.肌肉骨骼系统中扩散张量成像的供应商间和观察者间可靠性:一项多扫描仪磁共振研究
Insights Imaging. 2023 Feb 9;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01374-0.
8
Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve at 3.0 T using different MR scanners: agreement of FA and ADC measurements.使用不同磁共振扫描仪对正中神经进行 3.0T 弥散张量成像:FA 和 ADC 测量值的一致性。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Oct;82(10):e590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
9
Scan-rescan and inter-vendor reproducibility of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging metrics.神经丝取向弥散和密度成像指标的扫描-再扫描和跨供应商可重复性。
Neuroradiology. 2020 Apr;62(4):483-494. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02350-6. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
10
Accuracy of Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Diagnosing Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy in Patients Showing Spinal Cord Compression.扩散张量成像对显示脊髓受压的颈椎病性脊髓病患者的诊断准确性
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;16(6):1303-12. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1303. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of apparent diffusion coefficient of extraocular muscles from diffusion tensor imaging scanning in the assessment of disease activity of thyroid eye disease.扩散张量成像扫描测量的眼外肌表观扩散系数在甲状腺眼病疾病活动度评估中的应用
BMC Endocr Disord. 2024 Dec 24;24(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01818-8.
2
Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data for cervical and thoracic spinal cord at 1.5 T and 3 T using longitudinal ComBat.使用纵向 ComBat 对 1.5T 和 3T 下颈椎和胸段脊髓的多部位弥散张量成像数据进行调和。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 13;13(1):19809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46465-6.
3
Diffusion tensor imaging discriminates focal cortical dysplasia from normal brain parenchyma and differentiates between focal cortical dysplasia types.

本文引用的文献

1
Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain.脑临床序列扩散磁共振成像参数的多中心可重复性
NMR Biomed. 2015 Apr;28(4):468-85. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3269.
2
Intersite Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging on Two 3T Scanners.两台3T扫描仪上扩散张量成像的不同部位间可靠性
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2015;14(3):227-33. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2014-0077. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
3
Imago Mundi, Imago AD, Imago ADNI.世界意象、AD意象、ADNI意象。
扩散张量成像可区分局灶性皮质发育异常与正常脑实质,并区分不同类型的局灶性皮质发育异常。
Insights Imaging. 2023 Feb 24;14(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01368-y.
4
Inter-vendor and inter-observer reliability of diffusion tensor imaging in the musculoskeletal system: a multiscanner MR study.肌肉骨骼系统中扩散张量成像的供应商间和观察者间可靠性:一项多扫描仪磁共振研究
Insights Imaging. 2023 Feb 9;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01374-0.
5
Fiber tractography bundle segmentation depends on scanner effects, vendor effects, acquisition resolution, diffusion sampling scheme, diffusion sensitization, and bundle segmentation workflow.束追踪纤维分割依赖于扫描仪的影响、供应商的影响、采集分辨率、扩散采样方案、扩散敏感和束分割工作流程。
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 15;242:118451. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118451. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Voxel-based correlation of F-THK5351 accumulation with gray matter structural networks in cognitively normal older adults.认知功能正常的老年人中基于体素的F-THK5351蓄积与灰质结构网络的相关性
eNeurologicalSci. 2021 Apr 28;23:100343. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2021.100343. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy: Evaluating Microstructural Changes of Extraocular Muscles and Optic Nerves Using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging-Based Diffusion Tensor Imaging.甲状腺相关眼病:应用基于读出分段回波平面成像的扩散张量成像技术评估眼外肌和视神经的微观结构变化。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Mar;21(3):332-340. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0053.
8
A Glimpse on Trends and Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the .对近期发表在……上的文章的趋势和特点的一瞥
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1555-1561. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0928.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Aug 29;6(5):62. doi: 10.1186/s13195-014-0062-5. eCollection 2014.
4
Multisite longitudinal reliability of tract-based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging of healthy elderly subjects.基于体素的各向异性扩散张量成像中健康老年人的多点纵向可靠性研究。
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:390-403. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.075. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
5
Multicenter reliability of diffusion tensor imaging.弥散张量成像的多中心可靠性。
Brain Connect. 2012;2(6):345-55. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0112.
6
Multicentre imaging measurements for oncology and in the brain.多中心成像测量在肿瘤学和大脑中的应用。
Br J Radiol. 2011 Dec;84 Spec No 2(Spec Iss 2):S213-26. doi: 10.1259/bjr/74316620.
7
A validation study of multicenter diffusion tensor imaging: reliability of fractional anisotropy and diffusivity values.多中心弥散张量成像的验证研究:各向异性分数和弥散值的可靠性。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):695-700. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2844. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
8
Multicenter stability of diffusion tensor imaging measures: a European clinical and physical phantom study.多中心弥散张量成像测量的稳定性:一项欧洲临床和物理体模研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Dec 30;194(3):363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
9
Intercenter differences in diffusion tensor MRI acquisition.脑弥散张量 MRI 采集的中心间差异。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jun;31(6):1458-68. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22186.
10
Identical, but not the same: intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scanners.相同但不相同:两台 3.0T 扫描仪上分数各向异性测量的同部位和不同部位可重复性。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 15;51(4):1384-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.046. Epub 2010 Mar 23.