Chianca Vito, Albano Domenico, Rizzo Stefania, Maas Mario, Sconfienza Luca Maria, Del Grande Filippo
Clinica di Radiologia EOC IIMSI, Lugano, Switzerland.
Ospedale Evangelico Betania, Via Argine 604, 80147, Naples, Italy.
Insights Imaging. 2023 Feb 9;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01374-0.
To evaluate the inter-observer and inter-vendor reliability of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in the musculoskeletal system.
This prospective study included six healthy volunteers three men (mean age: 42; range: 31-52 years) and three women (mean age: 36; range: 30-44 years). Each subject was scanned using different 3 Tesla magnetic resonance scanners from three different vendors at three different sites bilaterally. First, the intra-class correlation coefficient was used to determine between-observers agreement for overall measurements and clinical sites. Next, between-group comparisons were made through the nonparametric Friedman's test. Finally, the Bland-Altman method was used to determine agreement among the three scanner measurements, comparing them two by two.
A total of 792 measurement were calculated. ICC reported high levels of agreement between the two observers. ICC related to MD, FA, and RD measurements ranged from 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.90) to 0.95 (95% CI 0.94-0.96), from 0.85 (95% CI 0.81-0.88) to 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.96), and from 0.89 (0.85-0.90) to 0.92 (0.90-0.94). No statistically significant inter-vendor differences were observed. The Bland-Altmann method confirmed a high correlation between parameter values.
An excellent inter-observer and inter-vendor reliability was found in our study.
评估肌肉骨骼系统中扩散张量成像参数的观察者间和设备间可靠性。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了6名健康志愿者,3名男性(平均年龄:42岁;范围:31 - 52岁)和3名女性(平均年龄:36岁;范围:30 - 44岁)。每位受试者在三个不同地点双侧使用来自三个不同供应商的不同3特斯拉磁共振扫描仪进行扫描。首先,使用组内相关系数来确定观察者间在总体测量和临床部位方面的一致性。接下来,通过非参数Friedman检验进行组间比较。最后,使用Bland - Altman方法来确定三台扫描仪测量值之间的一致性,将它们两两进行比较。
共计算了792次测量值。组内相关系数显示两位观察者之间具有高度一致性。与平均扩散率(MD)、各向异性分数(FA)和径向扩散率(RD)测量相关的组内相关系数范围分别为0.88(95%置信区间0.85 - 0.90)至0.95(95%置信区间0.94 - 0.96)、0.85(95%置信区间0.81 - 0.88)至0.95(95%置信区间0.93 - 0.96)以及0.89(0.85 - 0.90)至0.92(0.90 - 0.94)。未观察到设备间存在统计学显著差异。Bland - Altman方法证实参数值之间具有高度相关性。
在我们的研究中发现了良好的观察者间和设备间可靠性。