• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥散张量成像的多中心可靠性。

Multicenter reliability of diffusion tensor imaging.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, 500 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242-1000, USA.

出版信息

Brain Connect. 2012;2(6):345-55. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0112.

DOI:10.1089/brain.2012.0112
PMID:23075313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3623569/
Abstract

A number of studies are now collecting diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data across sites. While the reliability of anatomical images has been established by a number of groups, the reliability of DTI data has not been studied as extensively. In this study, five healthy controls were recruited and imaged at eight imaging centers. Repeated measures were obtained across two imaging protocols allowing intra-subject and inter-site variability to be assessed. Regional measures within white matter were obtained for standard rotationally invariant measures: fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, radial diffusivity, and axial diffusivity. Intra-subject coefficient of variation (CV) was typically <1% for all scalars and regions. Inter-site CV increased to ~1%-3%. Inter-vendor variation was similar to inter-site variability. This variability includes differences in the actual implementation of the sequence.

摘要

目前,许多研究正在各个站点收集扩散张量成像(DTI)数据。尽管许多小组已经证实了解剖图像的可靠性,但 DTI 数据的可靠性尚未得到广泛研究。在这项研究中,招募了五名健康对照者,并在八个成像中心进行了成像。获得了两种成像方案的重复测量,以评估个体内和站点间的可变性。获得了标准旋转不变量的白质内区域测量值:各向异性分数、平均扩散率、径向扩散率和轴向扩散率。所有标量和区域的个体内变异系数(CV)通常<1%。站点间 CV 增加到约 1%-3%。供应商间的变化与站点间的变化相似。这种可变性包括序列实际实现方式的差异。

相似文献

1
Multicenter reliability of diffusion tensor imaging.弥散张量成像的多中心可靠性。
Brain Connect. 2012;2(6):345-55. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0112.
2
Multisite longitudinal reliability of tract-based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging of healthy elderly subjects.基于体素的各向异性扩散张量成像中健康老年人的多点纵向可靠性研究。
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:390-403. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.075. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
3
Reliability of the freehand region-of-interest method in quantitative cerebral diffusion tensor imaging.徒手勾画感兴趣区方法在定量脑弥散张量成像中的可靠性。
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Oct 4;21(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00663-8.
4
diffusion tensor imaging of the fetal brain: A reproducibility study.胎儿脑弥散张量成像:一项可重复性研究。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jun 9;15:601-612. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.013. eCollection 2017.
5
Region of interest correction factors improve reliability of diffusion imaging measures within and across scanners and field strengths.感兴趣区域校正因子可提高不同扫描仪及场强之间和之内扩散成像测量的可靠性。
Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 1;119:406-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.078. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Reliability and variability of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography in pediatric epilepsy.小儿癫痫中扩散张量成像(DTI)纤维束成像的可靠性与变异性
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Aug;37:116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.06.020. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
7
Test-retest reliability and sample size estimates after MRI scanner relocation.MRI 扫描仪移位后的重测信度和样本量估计。
Neuroimage. 2020 May 1;211:116608. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116608. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
8
Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain.脑临床序列扩散磁共振成像参数的多中心可重复性
NMR Biomed. 2015 Apr;28(4):468-85. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3269.
9
Differences in Gaussian diffusion tensor imaging and non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging model-based estimates of diffusion tensor invariants in the human brain.基于高斯扩散张量成像和非高斯扩散峰度成像模型的人脑扩散张量不变量估计差异。
Med Phys. 2016 May;43(5):2464. doi: 10.1118/1.4946819.
10
Identical, but not the same: intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scanners.相同但不相同:两台 3.0T 扫描仪上分数各向异性测量的同部位和不同部位可重复性。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 15;51(4):1384-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.046. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved injury detection through harmonizing multi-site neuroimaging data after experimental TBI: a Translational Outcomes Project in Neurotrauma consortium study.通过协调实验性创伤性脑损伤后的多部位神经影像数据改进损伤检测:神经创伤联盟研究中的一项转化结果项目
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1612598. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1612598. eCollection 2025.
2
Big Data, Small Bias: Harmonizing Diffusion MRI-Based Structural Connectomes to Mitigate Site-Related Bias in Data Integration.大数据,小偏差:协调基于扩散磁共振成像的结构连接组以减轻数据整合中与站点相关的偏差。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Jun 15;46(9):e70256. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70256.
3
Harmonization of Structural Brain Connectivity Through Distribution Matching.通过分布匹配实现脑结构连接的一致性
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Jun 15;46(9):e70257. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70257.
4
Associations of ischemic heart disease with brain glymphatic MRI indices and risk of Alzheimer's disease.缺血性心脏病与脑类淋巴系统MRI指标及阿尔茨海默病风险的关联。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Mar;12(3):100045. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100045. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
5
Harmonization of Structural Brain Connectivity through Distribution Matching.通过分布匹配实现脑结构连接的一致性
bioRxiv. 2025 May 8:2024.09.05.611489. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.05.611489.
6
Evaluation of Mean Shift, ComBat, and CycleGAN for Harmonizing Brain Connectivity Matrices Across Sites.用于跨站点协调脑连接矩阵的均值漂移、ComBat和CycleGAN评估。
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2024 Feb;12926. doi: 10.1117/12.3005563. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
7
Learning site-invariant features of connectomes to harmonize complex network measures.学习连接组的位置不变特征以协调复杂网络度量。
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2024 Feb;12930. doi: 10.1117/12.3009645. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
8
Empirical assessment of the assumptions of ComBat with diffusion tensor imaging.基于扩散张量成像对ComBat假设的实证评估。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024 Mar;11(2):024011. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.024011. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
9
MidRISH: Unbiased harmonization of rotationally invariant harmonics of the diffusion signal.MidRISH:对扩散信号的旋转不变谐波进行无偏协调。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Sep;111:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.033. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
10
Diffusion MRI harmonization via personalized template mapping.基于个性化模板映射的弥散磁共振成像协调
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Apr;45(5):e26661. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26661.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality Control of Diffusion Weighted Images.扩散加权图像的质量控制
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2010 Mar 11;7628:76280J-. doi: 10.1117/12.844748.
2
A comprehensive reliability assessment of quantitative diffusion tensor tractography.一种全面的定量弥散张量纤维束追踪可靠性评估。
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):1127-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.062. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
3
Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Preclinical Huntington's Disease.临床前亨廷顿舞蹈症的扩散张量成像
Brain Imaging Behav. 2009 Mar 1;3(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s11682-008-9051-2.
4
A complementary diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-histological study in a model of Huntington's disease.亨廷顿病模型中的互补扩散张量成像(DTI)-组织学研究。
Neurobiol Aging. 2012 May;33(5):945-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
5
Fully automated analysis using BRAINS: AutoWorkup.使用 BRAINS:AutoWorkup 进行全自动分析。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.047. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
6
Intercenter differences in diffusion tensor MRI acquisition.脑弥散张量 MRI 采集的中心间差异。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jun;31(6):1458-68. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22186.
7
Striatal and white matter predictors of estimated diagnosis for Huntington disease.纹状体和白质对亨廷顿病预估诊断的预测。
Brain Res Bull. 2010 May 31;82(3-4):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
8
Identical, but not the same: intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scanners.相同但不相同:两台 3.0T 扫描仪上分数各向异性测量的同部位和不同部位可重复性。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 15;51(4):1384-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.046. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
9
Reliability of fiber tracking measurements in diffusion tensor imaging for longitudinal study.弥散张量成像中纤维束追踪测量的纵向研究可靠性。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.062. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
10
Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging in Huntington's Disease.亨廷顿舞蹈病的纵向扩散张量成像
Exp Neurol. 2009 Apr;216(2):525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.12.026.