Suppr超能文献

使用不同磁共振扫描仪对正中神经进行 3.0T 弥散张量成像:FA 和 ADC 测量值的一致性。

Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve at 3.0 T using different MR scanners: agreement of FA and ADC measurements.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Oct;82(10):e590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the agreement of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the median nerve on 3.0 T MR scanners from different vendors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

IRB approved study including 16 healthy volunteers (9 women; mean age 30.6 ± 5.3 years). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the dominant wrist was performed on three 3.0 T MR scanners (GE, Siemens, Philips) using similar imaging protocols and vendor-proprietary hard- and software. Intra-, inter-reader and inter-vendor agreements were assessed.

RESULTS

ICCs for intra-/inter-reader agreements ranged from 0.843-0.970/0.846-0.956 for FA, and 0.840-0.940/0.726-0.929 for ADC, respectively. ANOVA analysis identified significant differences for FA/ADC measurements among vendors (p < 0.001/p < 0.01, respectively). Overall mean values for FA were 0.63 (SD ± 0.1) and 0.999 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s (SD ± 0.134 × 10(-3)) for ADC. A significant negative measurement bias was found for FA values from the GE scanner (-0.05 and -0.07) and for ADC values from the Siemens scanner (-0.053 and -0.063 × 10(-3)mm(2)/s) as compared to the remainder vendors

CONCLUSION

FA and ADC values of the median nerve obtained on different 3.0 T MR scanners differ significantly, but are in comparison to the standard deviation of absolute values small enough to not have an impact on larger group studies or when substantial diffusion changes can be expected. However, caution is warranted in an individual patient when interpreting diffusion values from different scanner acquisitions.

摘要

目的

评估来自不同供应商的 3.0T 磁共振扫描仪上正中神经的分数各向异性(FA)和表观扩散系数(ADC)值的一致性。

材料与方法

本研究经机构审查委员会批准,纳入 16 名健康志愿者(9 名女性;平均年龄 30.6±5.3 岁)。使用类似的成像方案和供应商专有硬件和软件,在 3 台 3.0T 磁共振扫描仪(GE、西门子、飞利浦)上对优势手腕进行弥散张量成像(DTI)。评估了内-读者、外-读者和供应商之间的一致性。

结果

FA 的内-读者/外-读者之间的 ICC 范围为 0.843-0.970/0.846-0.956,ADC 的 ICC 范围为 0.840-0.940/0.726-0.929。方差分析显示,供应商之间的 FA/ADC 测量值存在显著差异(p<0.001/p<0.01)。FA 的总体平均值为 0.63(标准差±0.1)和 0.999×10(-3)mm(2)/s(标准差±0.134×10(-3)),ADC 的平均值为 0.63(标准差±0.1)和 0.999×10(-3)mm(2)/s(标准差±0.134×10(-3))。与其余供应商相比,GE 扫描仪的 FA 值(-0.05 和-0.07)和西门子扫描仪的 ADC 值(-0.053 和-0.063×10(-3)mm(2)/s)的测量值存在显著的负向偏差。

结论

来自不同 3.0T 磁共振扫描仪的正中神经 FA 和 ADC 值存在显著差异,但与绝对值的标准差相比,差异较小,不会对较大组研究或当预期有明显扩散变化时产生影响。然而,在解释来自不同扫描仪采集的扩散值时,需要谨慎对待个体患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验