Suppr超能文献

标准预防知识与依从性:医生与医学检验科学家有差异吗?

Standard precaution knowledge and adherence: Do Doctors differ from Medical Laboratory Scientists?

作者信息

Ndu Anne C, Arinze-Onyia Sussan U

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria Nsukka.

Department of Community Medicine, Enugu State University College of Medicine, Parklane Enugu.

出版信息

Malawi Med J. 2017 Dec;29(4):294-300. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v29i4.3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Doctors and laboratory scientists are at risk of infection from blood borne pathogens during routine clinical duties. After over 20 years of standard precautions, health care workers knowledge and compliance is not adequate.

AIM

This study is aimed at comparing adherence and knowledge of standard precautions (SP) among Medical Laboratory Scientists (MLSs) and doctors.

METHODS

It was a cross sectional study done at University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, ItukuOzalla. A semi structured pre-tested questionnaire was the study instrument.

RESULTS

General knowledge of SP was high,76.2% in doctors and 67.6% in MLSs although there were differences between the two groups on the knowledge of components of SP. Safe injection practices, use of personal protective equipment as well as safe handling of contaminated equipment or surfaces was higher amongst doctors. Even though more than half of respondents in both groups, 53.1 % among doctors and 58.1% among MLSs had received training on standard precautions, this did not reflect in the practice. MLS reported more use of personal protective equipment such as gloves and coveralls (100% in MLS and 35% of doctors), P<0.001. Recapping of syringes was higher amongst doctors (63.6%) than MLS (55.1%).The doctors practiced better hand hygiene than MLS (P<0.001). Constraints that affected SP included non-availability of PPEs and emergency situations for both groups.

CONCLUSION

SP knowledge and practice are still low, and as such, there is a need to train doctors and MLS on the components of SP. Policies on SP need to be enforced and facilities for practice regularly supplied.

摘要

背景

在日常临床工作中,医生和实验室科学家面临血源性病原体感染的风险。在实施标准预防措施20多年后,医护人员的知识水平和依从性仍不理想。

目的

本研究旨在比较医学检验科学家(MLS)和医生对标准预防措施(SP)的依从性和知识水平。

方法

这是一项在尼日利亚大学教学医院伊图库奥扎拉进行的横断面研究。研究工具为一份经过预测试的半结构化问卷。

结果

对SP的总体知晓率较高,医生为76.2%,MLS为67.6%,尽管两组在SP组成部分的知识方面存在差异。医生在安全注射操作、使用个人防护设备以及安全处理污染设备或表面方面表现更好。尽管两组中超过一半的受访者,医生组为53.1%,MLS组为58.1%,接受过标准预防措施培训,但这并未在实践中体现出来。MLS报告更多使用手套和工作服等个人防护设备(MLS为100%,医生为35%),P<0.001。医生重新盖帽注射器的比例(63.6%)高于MLS(55.1%)。医生的手部卫生习惯比MLS更好(P<0.001)。影响SP的因素包括两组均存在个人防护用品短缺和紧急情况。

结论

SP的知识和实践水平仍然较低,因此,有必要对医生和MLS进行SP组成部分的培训。需要加强SP政策的执行,并定期提供实践设施。

相似文献

6
Compliance with standard precautions among operating room nurses in South Korea.韩国手术室护士对标准预防措施的依从性。
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):739-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.04.253. Epub 2008 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验