Department of Psychology.
Emotion. 2019 Apr;19(3):533-542. doi: 10.1037/emo0000458. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
Frequently, emotion is associated with enhancements in memory as long as arousal is not too extreme. Negative valence can also lead to increased false memories. Yet less is known about specific memory processes that drive these effects of emotional content on memory performance. The present study uses conjoint recognition analyses to investigate the memory processes associated with memory for negative and positive pictorial stimuli. Participants studied pictures, which had been rated as negative-arousing, positive-arousing, or neutral-non-arousing, before completing a recognition memory test 48 hr later. Contrary to initial expectations based on process-based estimates of emotional words, gist-based processing did not lead to high levels of true memory for negative pictures, nor were negative pictures associated with compellingly real false memories. Instead, negative pictures were recognized more frequently than neutral pictures, and this effect was related to increased verbatim-based identity judgments. However, emotional memory enhancements were not observed for positive pictures. These results indicate that emotional memory enhancements for negative pictures are related to enhanced verbatim processing of emotional material. When false memories did occur for negative pictures, they were because of gist-based similarity judgments as predicted by prior process-based estimates of false memory for negative-arousing words or pictures. Such results are discussed in terms of eyewitness memory and the processes underlying such remembering, because in many criminal and forensically relevant situations, witnesses, who are often victims as well, are asked to recognize the perpetrator or other arousing aspects of an event. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
通常情况下,只要情绪唤起不过于极端,情绪与记忆增强之间就存在关联。负性效价也会导致虚假记忆增加。然而,对于情绪内容对记忆表现影响的具体记忆过程,人们知之甚少。本研究采用联合识别分析来研究与负性和正性图片刺激记忆相关的记忆过程。参与者在 48 小时后完成识别记忆测试之前,先学习被评定为负性唤起、正性唤起或中性非唤起的图片。与基于情绪词的过程估计的初始预期相反,基于要点的处理并没有导致对负性图片的高水平真实记忆,也没有导致负性图片产生令人信服的真实虚假记忆。相反,负性图片比中性图片被识别的频率更高,这种效应与基于逐字的身份判断增加有关。然而,正性图片并没有观察到情绪记忆增强。这些结果表明,负性图片的情绪记忆增强与情绪材料的增强逐字处理有关。当负性图片确实产生虚假记忆时,这些记忆是由于基于要点的相似性判断,这与先前对负性唤起词或图片的虚假记忆的基于过程的估计一致。这样的结果是根据目击记忆和记忆背后的过程来讨论的,因为在许多刑事和法医相关的情况下,作为受害者的证人经常被要求识别犯罪者或事件中其他唤起的方面。(美国心理协会,2019 年)