Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital of Fulda, University Medical Center of Marburg, Fulda, Germany.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 2;13(7):e0199776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199776. eCollection 2018.
Out-of-hospital analgosedation in trauma patients is challenging for emergency physicians due to associated complications. We compared peripheral nerve block (PNB) with analgosedation (AS) as an analgetic approach for patients with isolated extremity injury, assuming that prehospital required medical interventions (e.g. reduction, splinting of dislocation injury) using PNB are less painful and more feasible compared to AS.
Thirty patients (aged 18 or older) were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided PNB (10 mL prilocaine 1%, 10 mL ropivacaine 0.2%) or analgosedation (midazolam combined with s-ketamine or with fentanyl). Reduction-feasibility was classified (easy, intermediate, impossible) and pain scores were assessed using numeric rating scales (NRS 0-10).
Eighteen patients were included in the PNB-group and twelve in the AS-group; 15 and 9 patients, respectively, suffered dislocation injury. In the PNB-group, reduction was more feasible (easy: 80.0%, impossible: 20.0%) compared to the AS-group (easy: 22.2%, intermediate: 22.2%, impossible: 55.6%; p = 0.01). During medical interventions, 5.6% [1/18] of the PNB-patients and 58.3% [7/12] of the AS-patients experienced pain (p<0.01). Recorded pain scores were significantly lower in the PNB-group during prehospital medical intervention (median[IQR] NRS PNB: 0[0-0]) compared to the AS-group (6[0-8]; p<0.001) as well as on first day post presentation (NRS PNB: 1[0-5], AS: 5[5-7]; p = 0.050). All patients of the PNB-group would recommend their analgesic technique (AS: 50.0%, p<0.01).
Prehospital ultrasound-guided PNB is rapidly performed in extremity injuries with high success. Compared to the commonly used AS in trauma patients, PNB significantly reduces pain intensity and severity.
由于相关并发症,创伤患者的院外镇痛对急诊医生来说具有挑战性。我们比较了外周神经阻滞(PNB)与镇痛(AS)作为治疗单纯肢体损伤患者的镇痛方法,假设使用 PNB 进行院前所需的医疗干预(例如复位、脱位损伤的固定)比 AS 更疼痛且更可行。
30 名(年龄 18 岁或以上)患者被随机分为接受超声引导下 PNB(10 毫升 1%普鲁卡因、10 毫升 0.2%罗哌卡因)或镇痛(咪达唑仑联合 S-氯胺酮或芬太尼)。复位的可行性分为(容易、中等、不可能),并使用数字评分量表(NRS 0-10)评估疼痛评分。
PNB 组 18 例,AS 组 12 例;分别有 15 例和 9 例患者发生脱位损伤。在 PNB 组中,复位更可行(容易:80.0%,不可能:20.0%),与 AS 组相比(容易:22.2%,中等:22.2%,不可能:55.6%;p=0.01)。在医疗干预过程中,PNB 组有 5.6%[1/18]的患者和 AS 组有 58.3%[7/12]的患者感到疼痛(p<0.01)。PNB 组在院前医疗干预期间(中位数[IQR] NRS PNB:0[0-0])和首次就诊后第一天(NRS PNB:1[0-5],AS:5[5-7])记录的疼痛评分明显低于 AS 组(p<0.001)。PNB 组的所有患者都推荐他们的镇痛技术(AS:50.0%,p<0.01)。
在外周神经阻滞(PNB)在肢体损伤中快速进行,成功率高。与创伤患者常用的 AS 相比,PNB 显著降低疼痛强度和严重程度。