Department of Trauma and Emergency, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Department of Trauma and Emergency, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;63:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.10.020. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
To compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided selective peripheral nerve block (PNB) and sub-dissociative dose ketamine (SDK) for management of acute pain in patients with extremity injuries presenting to the emergency department (ED).
This prospective, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted in the ED of a tertiary care Institute. The patients were provided with either ultrasound-guided selective PNB or SDK. The primary outcome was a reduction in pain in numerical rating scale (NRS) by at least 3 points without rescue analgesia. The secondary outcomes were the need for rescue analgesia, adverse events, and patient satisfaction on either arm.
A total of 111 patients with isolated traumatic extremity injuries were included in the final analysis. The NRS score was significantly lower in the PNB group compared to the SDK group at 30, 60,120, 180-, and 240-min post-intervention [group ∼ time interaction, F (5, 647) = 21.53, p ≤ 0.001]. All the patients in the PNB group exhibited primary outcome (NRS ≥3 reductions) at 30 min post-intervention compared with 36 (65%) in the SDK group [-1.02(-1.422,0.622)]. Rescue analgesia was required in 10 (18%) patients in the SDK group compared to none in the PNB group [0.663(0.277,1.050)]. The decrease in NRS score from baseline at 30 min was significantly higher in PNB groups compared to the SDK group [-2.166(-2.640, -1.692)]. The most common side effect reported in the SDK group was dizziness 35(64%), followed by nausea 15(27%). None of the patients in the PNB group reported any complications. Patient satisfaction was higher in the PNB group than SDK group.
The study provides evidence that ultrasound-guided PNB is superior to SDK in terms of its analgesic efficacy in the management of acute pain due to extremity injuries and is associated with higher patient satisfaction. The need for rescue analgesia was significantly less in the PNB group. SDK was associated with a high incidence of dizziness and nausea.
比较超声引导下选择性外周神经阻滞(PNB)和亚分离剂量氯胺酮(SDK)在治疗因四肢损伤就诊于急诊(ED)的患者的急性疼痛方面的疗效。
这是一项在一家三级护理研究所的 ED 进行的前瞻性、开放性随机临床试验。为患者提供超声引导下选择性 PNB 或 SDK。主要结局是数字评分量表(NRS)至少降低 3 分而无需解救镇痛。次要结局是在任一侧需要解救镇痛、不良事件和患者满意度。
共纳入 111 例孤立性创伤性四肢损伤患者进行最终分析。与 SDK 组相比,PNB 组在干预后 30、60、120、180 和 240 分钟时 NRS 评分明显降低[组间时间交互作用,F(5,647)=21.53,p≤0.001]。PNB 组所有患者在干预后 30 分钟时均达到主要结局(NRS 降低≥3 分),而 SDK 组为 36 例(65%)[-1.02(-1.422,0.622)]。SDK 组有 10 例(18%)患者需要解救镇痛,而 PNB 组无患者需要[-0.663(0.277,1.050)]。与 SDK 组相比,PNB 组在 30 分钟时 NRS 评分从基线的下降幅度明显更高[-2.166(-2.640,-1.692)]。SDK 组最常见的不良反应是头晕 35 例(64%),其次是恶心 15 例(27%)。PNB 组无患者报告任何并发症。PNB 组患者满意度高于 SDK 组。
该研究提供的证据表明,在治疗四肢损伤引起的急性疼痛方面,超声引导下 PNB 在镇痛效果方面优于 SDK,并且患者满意度更高。PNB 组需要解救镇痛的患者明显较少。SDK 组与头晕和恶心的发生率较高有关。