Utah State University, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Sep;108:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
The objective of this study was to test whether treatment acceptability, exposure engagement, and completion rates could be increased by integrating acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with traditional exposure and response prevention (ERP). 58 adults (68% female) diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD; M age = 27, 80% white) engaged in a multisite randomized controlled trial of 16 individual twice-weekly sessions of either ERP or ACT + ERP. Assessors unaware of treatment condition administered assessments of OCD, depression, psychological flexibility, and obsessional beliefs at pretreatment, posttreatment, and six-month follow-up. Treatment acceptability, credibility/expectancy, and exposure engagement were also assessed. Exposure engagement was high in both conditions and there were no significant differences in exposure engagement, treatment acceptability, or dropout rates between ACT + ERP and ERP. OCD symptoms, depression, psychological inflexibility, and obsessional beliefs decreased significantly at posttreatment and were maintained at follow-up in both conditions. No between-group differences in outcome were observed using intent to treat and predicted data from multilevel modeling. ACT + ERP and ERP were both highly effective treatments for OCD, and no differences were found in outcomes, processes of change, acceptability, or exposure engagement.
本研究旨在检验将接受与承诺疗法(ACT)与传统暴露和反应预防(ERP)相结合是否能提高治疗的可接受性、暴露参与度和完成率。58 名被诊断为强迫症(OCD;M 年龄=27,80%为白人)的成年人参加了一项多地点随机对照试验,接受了 16 次个体每周两次的 ERP 或 ACT+ERP 治疗。评估人员在治疗前、治疗后和 6 个月随访时对 OCD、抑郁、心理灵活性和强迫性信念进行评估,而不了解治疗情况。还评估了治疗的可接受性、可信度/期望和暴露参与度。两种治疗方法的暴露参与度都很高,ACT+ERP 和 ERP 之间在暴露参与度、治疗的可接受性或脱落率方面没有显著差异。治疗后 OCD 症状、抑郁、心理灵活性和强迫性信念显著下降,在两种治疗方法中均保持在随访时的水平。意向治疗和多层次建模预测数据均未观察到组间疗效差异。ACT+ERP 和 ERP 都是治疗 OCD 的有效方法,在疗效、变化过程、可接受性或暴露参与度方面均无差异。