Lee Seung Jae, Lee Sang Won, Choi Mina
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Mar;21(3):275-283. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0240. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Obsessions and Compulsions (AAQ-OC) is a version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) that specifically measures unwanted intrusive thoughts and responses (e.g., experiential avoidance) to them. This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the AAQ-OC in clinical and nonclinical Korean samples.
In this study, 561 university students and 121 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) completed the AAQ-OC and several other psychological scales. Descriptive, correlation, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as group comparisons were conducted.
The results of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated a two-factor structure that best fits the data in the university sample: Factors 1 and 2 matched the original Valued Action and Willingness subscales, respectively. The reliability analyses revealed that the AAQ-OC and its factors had excellent internal consistencies. As regards the concurrent validity, the AAQ-OC and its factors had a positive correlation with the AAQ-II and Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Compared with the university students, the OCD patients had higher AAQ-OC scores, and their obsessive-compulsive symptoms, particularly the two symptom dimensions of responsibility for harm and mistakes and unacceptable thoughts, were significantly associated with the AAQ-OC and two subscales.
The findings of this study confirm the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the AAQ-OC.
强迫观念与强迫行为接纳与行动问卷(AAQ-OC)是接纳与行动问卷(AAQ)的一个版本,专门用于测量 unwanted intrusive thoughts 及其应对方式(如经验性回避)。本研究旨在探讨AAQ-OC韩语版在韩国临床和非临床样本中的信效度。
本研究中,561名大学生和121名强迫症(OCD)患者完成了AAQ-OC及其他几份心理量表。进行了描述性、相关性、探索性和验证性因素分析以及组间比较。
探索性和验证性因素分析结果表明,两因素结构最适合大学样本中的数据:因素1和因素2分别与原始的重视行动和意愿子量表相匹配。信度分析显示,AAQ-OC及其各因素具有良好的内部一致性。在同时效度方面,AAQ-OC及其各因素与AAQ-II和认知融合问卷呈正相关。与大学生相比,OCD患者的AAQ-OC得分更高,他们的强迫症状,尤其是伤害责任和错误以及不可接受想法这两个症状维度,与AAQ-OC及其两个子量表显著相关。
本研究结果证实了AAQ-OC韩语版的信效度。