Department of Analytical Biochemistry, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Systems Medicine and Metabolic Signaling, Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018 Sep;410(23):5859-5870. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1200-x. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
Lipidomics is a rapidly developing field in modern biomedical research. While LC-MS systems are able to detect most of the known lipid classes in a biological matrix, there is no single technique able to extract all of them simultaneously. In comparison with two-phase extractions, one-phase extraction systems are of particular interest, since they decrease the complexity of the experimental procedure. By using an untargeted lipidomics approach, we explored the differences/similarities between the most commonly used two-phase extraction systems (Folch, Bligh and Dyer, and MTBE) and one of the more recently introduced one-phase extraction systems for lipid analysis based on the MMC solvent mixture (MeOH/MTBE/CHCl). The four extraction methods were evaluated and thoroughly compared against a pooled extract that qualitatively and quantitatively represents the average of the combined extractions. Our results show that the lipid profile obtained with the MMC system displayed the highest similarity to the pooled extract, indicating that it was most representative of the lipidome in the original sample. Furthermore, it showed better extraction efficiencies for moderate and highly apolar lipid species in comparison with the Folch, Bligh and Dyer, and MTBE extraction systems. Finally, the technical simplicity of the MMC procedure makes this solvent system highly suitable for automated, untargeted lipidomics analysis.
脂质组学是现代生物医学研究中一个迅速发展的领域。虽然 LC-MS 系统能够检测生物基质中大多数已知的脂质类别,但没有一种单一的技术能够同时提取它们。与两相提取相比,单相提取系统特别有趣,因为它们降低了实验程序的复杂性。通过使用非靶向脂质组学方法,我们探索了最常用的两相提取系统(Folch、Bligh 和 Dyer 以及 MTBE)与基于 MMC 溶剂混合物(MeOH/MTBE/CHCl)的最近引入的单相提取系统之间的差异/相似之处。评估了四种提取方法,并与代表合并提取的平均值的混合提取物进行了全面比较。我们的结果表明,MMC 系统获得的脂质图谱与混合提取物具有最高的相似性,表明它最能代表原始样品中的脂质组。此外,与 Folch、Bligh 和 Dyer 以及 MTBE 提取系统相比,它对中等极性和高极性脂质具有更好的提取效率。最后,MMC 程序的技术简单性使该溶剂系统非常适合自动化、非靶向脂质组学分析。