Comparison of one-phase and two-phase extraction methods for porcine tissue lipidomics applying a fast and reliable tentative annotation workflow.

Lipidomics has great potential for the discovery of biomarkers, elucidation of metabolic processes and identifying dysregulations in complex biological systems. Concerning biofluids like plasma or cerebrospinal fluid, several studies for the comparison of lipid extraction solvents have already been conducted. With respect to tissues, which can differ significantly in terms of dry matter content and composition, only few studies are available. The proper selection of an extraction method that covers the complexity and individuality of different tissues is challenging. The goal of this work was to provide a systematic overview on the potential of different extraction methods for a broad applicability. This study covers six different extraction procedures and four different reconstitution solvents applied to ten different porcine tissues. To get an overview of the individual lipid profiles, a workflow was developed for a fast and reliable tentative lipid annotation. Therefore, several machine learning tools were utilized, like the prediction of collision cross sections to support the tentative lipid identification in case of untargeted lipidomics. In terms of data evaluation, unsupervised (e.g. principal component analysis) and supervised (e.g. partial least square - discriminant analysis) methods were applied to visualize and subsequently interpret all generated information. Furthermore, the influence of the tissue composition on the extraction performance was investigated. It could be shown that the ten porcine tissues can be distinguished based on their lipid profile with the applied workflow and that the methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) based extraction method (two-phase) showed the best overall performance for the 16 examined lipid species. With this method the highest number of features (428 in lung tissue) could be annotated. Upcoming one-phase extractions also showed a high potential concerning total number of extracted lipids. Methanol/MTBE/chloroform (MMC) extracted slightly less lipids (393 in lung and liver) than MTBE but turned out to be the best one-phase extraction method. Additionally, the numbers of extracted lipids obtained by isopropanol/water 90:10 (IPA90) (399 in stomach) and by isopropanol/methanol/chloroform (IMC) (395 in stomach) were similar to those of the modified Folch method (402 in stomach). One-phase extractions can therefore clearly be seen as preferable when a high throughput is needed.