Patient and Population Health Research, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 4;13(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0786-x.
Computerised clinical decision support (CCDS) has been shown to improve processes of care in some healthcare settings, but there is little evidence related to its use or effects in pre-hospital emergency care. CCDS in this setting aligns with policies to increase IT use in ambulance care, enhance paramedic decision-making skills, reduce avoidable emergency department attendances and improve quality of care and patient experience. This qualitative study was conducted alongside a cluster randomised trial in two ambulance services of the costs and effects of web-based CCDS system designed to support paramedic decision-making in the care of older people following a fall. Paramedics were trained to enter observations and history for relevant patients on a tablet, and the CCDS then generated a recommended course of action which could be logged. Our aim was to describe paramedics' experience of the CCDS intervention and to identify factors affecting its implementation and use.
We invited all paramedics who had been randomly allocated to the intervention arm of the trial to participate in interviews or focus groups. The study was underpinned by Strong Structuration Theory, a theoretical model for studying innovation based on the relationship between what people do and their context. We used the Framework approach to data analysis.
Twenty out of 22 paramedics agreed to participate. We developed a model of paramedic experience of CCDS with three domains: context, adoption and use, and outcomes. Aspects of context which had an impact included organisational culture and perceived support for non-conveyance decisions. Experience of adoption and use of the CCDS varied between individual paramedics, with some using it with all eligible patients, some only with patients they thought were 'suitable' and some never using it. A range of outcomes were reported, some of which were different from the intended role of the technology in decision support.
Implementation of new technology such as CCDS is not a one-off event, but an ongoing process, which requires support at the organisational level to be effective.
ISRCTN Registry 10538608 . Registered 1 May 2007. Retrospectively registered.
在一些医疗保健环境中,计算机化临床决策支持(CCDS)已被证明可以改善护理流程,但在院前急救护理中,关于其使用或效果的证据很少。在这种情况下,CCDS 符合增加急救护理中 IT 使用、增强护理人员决策技能、减少不必要的急诊就诊次数以及提高护理质量和患者体验的政策。这项定性研究是在两项救护车服务的一项基于网络的 CCDS 系统的成本和效果的集群随机试验中进行的,该系统旨在支持护理人员在老年人跌倒后护理中的决策。护理人员接受了在平板电脑上输入相关患者的观察结果和病史的培训,然后 CCDS 生成一个建议的治疗方案,可以进行记录。我们的目的是描述护理人员对 CCDS 干预措施的体验,并确定影响其实施和使用的因素。
我们邀请了所有随机分配到试验干预组的护理人员参加访谈或焦点小组。该研究基于强结构理论,这是一种用于研究创新的理论模型,基于人们所做的事情与其环境之间的关系。我们使用框架方法进行数据分析。
22 名护理人员中有 20 名同意参与。我们开发了一个护理人员对 CCDS 体验的模型,该模型有三个领域:背景、采用和使用以及结果。对背景有影响的方面包括组织文化和对非转运决策的支持。护理人员对 CCDS 的采用和使用经验因人而异,有些护理人员对所有符合条件的患者使用它,有些护理人员只对他们认为“合适”的患者使用,有些护理人员从未使用过它。报告了一系列结果,其中一些与技术在决策支持中的预期作用不同。
新的技术,如 CCDS 的实施不是一次性的事件,而是一个持续的过程,需要在组织层面上得到支持才能有效。
ISRCTN 注册 10538608。2007 年 5 月 1 日注册。回溯性注册。