Lewis Melissa A, Cadigan Jennifer M, Cronce Jessica M, Kilmer Jason R, Suffoletto Brian, Walter Theresa, Lee Christine M
Am J Health Behav. 2018 Jul 1;42(4):70-79. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.42.4.7.
Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate how community college students with hazardous drinking perceived the usefulness of alcohol protective behavioral strategy text messages (TM-PBS). Methods Community college students with past hazardous single occasion or weekly drinking (N = 48; 60% female) were randomized to receive 2 TM-PBS on 3 typical drinking days per week for 2 weeks selected by: (1) research investigators (ie, based on clinical and theoretical application); (2) participants (ie, messages highly rated at baseline by the participants); or (3) a random process. Prior to 2 typical drinking days per week, immediately after receiving TMs, we asked: "How useful do you think this strategy will be for you when you drink? Text a number from 1 (not useful) to 5 (very useful)." Results Response rates for the 12 messages ranged from 72.9% to 87.5%, with no differences in response rates across selection categories (ie, investigator, participant, random). Investigator-selected messages were rated as less useful than messages that were self-selected by participants or messages that were selected at random. Conclusions TM-PBS chosen a priori by students were perceived as more useful than TM-PBS chosen by investigators, supporting this form of tailoring in alcohol interventions to optimize usefulness.
目的 本研究旨在评估有危险饮酒行为的社区大学生对酒精保护性行为策略短信(TM-PBS)有用性的认知。方法 有过单次危险饮酒或每周危险饮酒经历的社区大学生(N = 48;60%为女性)被随机分为三组,在每周选定的3个典型饮酒日接收2条TM-PBS,为期2周,分组方式如下:(1)研究人员选定(即基于临床和理论应用);(2)参与者选定(即参与者在基线时给予高评分的短信);或(3)随机过程。在每周2个典型饮酒日之前,参与者收到短信后,我们立即询问:“你认为这个策略在你饮酒时对你有多有用?从1(没用)到5(非常有用)中选一个数字发短信告知。”结果 12条短信的回复率在72.9%至87.5%之间,不同选择类别(即研究人员选定、参与者选定、随机选定)的回复率无差异。研究人员选定的短信被认为不如参与者自行选定的短信或随机选定的短信有用。结论 学生事先选定的TM-PBS比研究人员选定的TM-PBS被认为更有用,这支持了在酒精干预中采用这种量身定制的方式以优化有用性。