• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

融入与脱颖而出:通过偏差调节干预增加酒精保护性行为策略的使用

Fitting in and standing out: increasing the use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies with a deviance regulation intervention.

作者信息

Dvorak Robert D, Pearson Matthew R, Neighbors Clayton, Martens Matthew P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University.

Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Jun;83(3):482-93. doi: 10.1037/a0038902. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1037/a0038902
PMID:25798727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4446142/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Heavy alcohol use remains a consistent public health concern on college campuses. The current pilot study used deviance regulation theory (DRT) to modify protective behavioral strategies (PBS) among college student drinkers to reduce alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences.

METHOD

The sample was comprised of current college student drinkers (n = 76; 53.95% female) ranging in age from 18-24 (M = 19.29, SD = 1.42). Participants were randomly assigned to receive a positively or negatively framed message. They then reported on use of alcohol PBS (via the Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale), alcohol consumption (via the Modified Daily Drinking Questionnaire), and alcohol-related consequences (via the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire) each week for 6 weeks.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Among drinkers with low PBS use norms, a positively, versus a negatively, framed message resulted in increased PBS use and consequently less alcohol consumption and fewer alcohol-related consequences. Among drinkers with high PBS use norms, a negatively, versus positively, framed message resulted in increased PBS use and consequently lower alcohol consumption and fewer alcohol-related consequences. However, these effects were only relevant among those who strongly believed the DRT frame. Findings suggest assigning drinkers to frames based on perceived PBS use norms and increasing belief in the frame may be 1 approach to increasing responsible drinking patterns among college students. Furthermore, the current data suggests important boundary conditions for norm-based interventions.

摘要

目的

大量饮酒仍是大学校园持续存在的公共卫生问题。当前的试点研究运用偏差调节理论(DRT)来调整大学生饮酒者的保护性行为策略(PBS),以减少酒精使用及与酒精相关的后果。

方法

样本由当前的大学生饮酒者组成(n = 76;53.95%为女性),年龄在18至24岁之间(M = 19.29,SD = 1.42)。参与者被随机分配接受正面或负面框架的信息。然后,他们在6周内每周报告酒精PBS的使用情况(通过保护性行为策略量表)、酒精消费情况(通过改良每日饮酒问卷)以及与酒精相关的后果(通过青年成人酒精后果问卷)。

结果与结论

在PBS使用规范较低的饮酒者中,正面框架而非负面框架的信息会导致PBS使用增加,从而减少酒精消费及与酒精相关的后果。在PBS使用规范较高的饮酒者中,负面框架而非正面框架的信息会导致PBS使用增加,从而降低酒精消费及与酒精相关的后果。然而,这些影响仅在那些强烈相信DRT框架的人当中才显著。研究结果表明,根据感知到的PBS使用规范为饮酒者分配框架,并增强对该框架的信念,可能是增加大学生负责任饮酒模式的一种方法。此外,当前数据表明了基于规范的干预措施的重要边界条件。

相似文献

1
Fitting in and standing out: increasing the use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies with a deviance regulation intervention.融入与脱颖而出:通过偏差调节干预增加酒精保护性行为策略的使用
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Jun;83(3):482-93. doi: 10.1037/a0038902. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
2
Deviance regulation theory and drinking outcomes among Greek-life students during spring break.偏差行为调节理论与希腊生活学生春假期间的饮酒结果
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Aug;26(4):366-376. doi: 10.1037/pha0000204. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
3
A Deviance Regulation Theory Intervention Affects the Association Between Narcissistic Traits and Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategies in College Students.偏差调节理论干预对大学生自恋特质与酒精危害降低策略之间的关系产生影响。
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(10):1546-1555. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2360108. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
4
A randomized control trial of a deviance regulation theory intervention to increase alcohol protective strategies.一项基于偏差调节理论的随机对照试验干预,以增加酒精保护策略。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Dec;86(12):1061-1075. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000347.
5
A road paved with safe intentions: Increasing intentions to use alcohol protective behavioral strategies via Deviance Regulation Theory.一条铺就于安全意图之上的道路:通过偏差调节理论提高使用酒精防护行为策略的意图。
Health Psychol. 2016 Jun;35(6):604-13. doi: 10.1037/hea0000327. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
6
An application of deviance regulation theory to reduce alcohol-related problems among college women during spring break.应用偏差行为调节理论减少春假期间大学女生与酒精相关的问题。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 May;31(3):295-306. doi: 10.1037/adb0000258. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
Test of a deviance regulation theory intervention among first-year college student drinkers: Differential effects via frequency and quantity norms.对一年级大学生饮酒者进行偏差调节理论干预的测试:通过频率和数量规范的差异效应。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Sep;36(6):619-634. doi: 10.1037/adb0000777. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
8
The Impact of Protective Behavioral Strategy Use Frequency on Blood Alcohol Concentrations Among Student Drinkers Nationwide.全国范围内学生饮酒者使用保护性行为策略的频率对血液酒精浓度的影响。
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Jan;32(1):205-209. doi: 10.1177/0890117116686901. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
9
Weighing the Pros and Cons of Using Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies: A Qualitative Examination among College Students.权衡使用酒精保护行为策略的利弊:大学生定性研究。
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Nov 10;53(13):2190-2198. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1464026. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Use of protective behavioral strategies and their association to 21st birthday alcohol consumption and related negative consequences: a between- and within-person evaluation.使用保护性行为策略及其与 21 岁生日时的酒精消费和相关负面后果的关联:个体间和个体内评估。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Jun;26(2):179-86. doi: 10.1037/a0023797. Epub 2011 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Protective Behavioral Strategies for Psychedelic Use: A Mini Review of the Evidence.迷幻药使用的保护性行为策略:证据综述
Psychedelic Med (New Rochelle). 2024 Dec 2;2(4):234-242. doi: 10.1089/psymed.2023.0052. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Effects of a Brief Safe Drinking Intervention on Depressive and Anxiety Symptomatology: Examining Potential Side Effects of Deviance Regulation Theory Interventions.简短安全饮酒干预对抑郁和焦虑症状的影响:检验偏差调节理论干预的潜在副作用。
J Drug Educ. 2024 Sep;53(3-4):102-117. doi: 10.1177/00472379241272587. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
3
A Deviance Regulation Theory Intervention Affects the Association Between Narcissistic Traits and Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategies in College Students.偏差调节理论干预对大学生自恋特质与酒精危害降低策略之间的关系产生影响。
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(10):1546-1555. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2360108. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
4
The role of sociocultural factors on alcohol self-efficacy and protective drinking behaviors among Hispanic/Latinx young adults.社会文化因素对西班牙裔/拉丁裔青年成年人酒精自我效能和保护性饮酒行为的影响。
Ethn Health. 2024 May-Jul;29(4-5):553-577. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2024.2345916. Epub 2024 May 7.
5
A systematic review of the associations between protective behavioral strategies and heavy alcohol consumption and consequences among young adults.一项关于保护性行为策略与年轻成年人重度饮酒和后果之间关联的系统评价。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Jun;38(4):488-506. doi: 10.1037/adb0001002. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
6
A cross-sectional examination of race, gender, and intersectionality on protective behavioral strategies and alcohol outcomes among Black and White college students.对黑人和白人大学生在保护性行为策略和饮酒结果方面的种族、性别及交叉性进行的横断面研究。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Dec;32(6):682-692. doi: 10.1037/pha0000712. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
7
Development and validation of the Personal Assessment of Responsible Drinking Identity (PARDI) with a college student sample.开发和验证大学生样本的个人负责任饮酒身份评估(PARDI)。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Jul;35(7):618-632. doi: 10.1037/pas0001236. Epub 2023 May 25.
8
Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies in Young Spanish Adults in the Community: A Prospective Study of Perceived Efficacy and Social Norms.社区中西班牙年轻成年人的酒精保护行为策略:感知效能和社会规范的前瞻性研究。
Psicothema. 2022 May;34(2):266-274. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2021.413.
9
A novel approach to assess descriptive and injunctive norms for college student marijuana use.一种评估大学生大麻使用的描述性规范和指令性规范的新方法。
Addict Behav. 2021 Jun;117:106755. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106755. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
10
Predicting the development of pro-bullying bystander behavior: A short-term longitudinal analysis.预测亲霸凌旁观者行为的发展:一项短期纵向分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Dec;77:77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Unique direct and indirect effects of impulsivity-like traits on alcohol-related outcomes via protective behavioral strategies.冲动样特质通过保护性行为策略对酒精相关结果产生独特的直接和间接影响。
J Drug Educ. 2012;42(4):425-46. doi: 10.2190/DE.42.4.d.
2
A cross-lagged panel model examining protective behavioral strategies: are types of strategies differentially related to alcohol use and consequences?一个检验保护性行为策略的交叉滞后面板模型:不同类型的策略与酒精使用及后果之间的关系是否存在差异?
Addict Behav. 2014 Feb;39(2):480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
3
Use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies among college students: a critical review.大学生使用酒精保护性行为策略:批判性评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Dec;33(8):1025-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
4
Daily use of protective behavioral strategies and alcohol-related outcomes among college students.大学生日常使用保护性行为策略与酒精相关后果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):826-31. doi: 10.1037/a0032516. Epub 2013 May 6.
5
The efficacy of single-component brief motivational interventions among at-risk college drinkers.单一组分简短动机干预在有风险的大学生饮酒者中的效果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Aug;81(4):691-701. doi: 10.1037/a0032235. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
6
Personalized feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: an update of Walters & Neighbors (2005).针对大学生酒精滥用问题的个性化反馈干预措施:沃尔特斯与内ighbors(2005年)研究的更新
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Dec;27(4):909-20. doi: 10.1037/a0031174. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
7
Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory.贝叶斯结构方程建模:对实质性理论更灵活的表述。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):313-35. doi: 10.1037/a0026802.
8
A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking.一项行为经济学补充简短动机干预以减少大学生饮酒的随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Oct;80(5):876-86. doi: 10.1037/a0028763. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
9
Protective behavioral strategies as a mediator and moderator of the relationship between self-regulation and alcohol-related consequences in first-year college students.保护性行为策略在大学生自我调节与酒精相关后果的关系中作为中介和调节因素。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Jun;26(2):330-7. doi: 10.1037/a0026942. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
10
Projection, conformity and deviance regulation: a prospective study of alcohol use.投射、从众与越轨调节:饮酒的前瞻性研究
Psychol Health. 2012;27(6):688-703. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.620106. Epub 2011 Dec 16.