Department of Psychology, Kyoto Gakuen University, 1-1 Nanjo-ootani, Sogabecho, Kameoka, Kyoto, 621-8555, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 4;8(1):10117. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28347-4.
We conducted two experiments to investigate the effects of word list consistency and group collaboration on false memory. Using the DRM (Deese-Roediger-McDermott) paradigm, the first experiment (n = 121) examined false memory in a group; participants collaborated to select keywords using a between-subject condition of a consistent or randomized word list. The proportion of false responses was larger than that of error responses, especially for the consistent word list condition (p < 0.001), and group collaboration increased false recognition for both word lists (p < 0.001). Using an applied within-subject word list condition, the second experiment (n = 119) confirmed the results of Experiment 1. Furthermore, individual differences Euclidean distance model analysis revealed a difference in the shared cognitive dimension related to group false memory.
我们进行了两项实验,以调查词表一致性和小组协作对错误记忆的影响。使用 DRM(Deese-Roediger-McDermott)范式,第一项实验(n=121)在小组中考察了错误记忆;参与者通过一致或随机词表的被试间条件合作选择关键词。错误反应的比例大于错误反应的比例,尤其是在一致词表条件下(p<0.001),小组协作增加了两种词表的错误识别(p<0.001)。使用应用于个体的词表条件,第二项实验(n=119)证实了实验 1 的结果。此外,个体差异欧几里得距离模型分析揭示了与小组错误记忆相关的共享认知维度的差异。